Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Security Controls vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Ivanti holds a 2.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Ivanti Security Controls
Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls reviews
  • 958 Views
  • 958 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 86 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 10,331 Views
  • 3,306 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Security Controls both operate within the IT and security management sector. Microsoft Configuration Manager generally offers an upper hand for organizations integrated into the Microsoft ecosystem, while Ivanti Security Controls shows strength with security management features that suit various IT environments.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager enables seamless management through its deep integration with Microsoft tools, offering robust asset inventory, application deployment, and compliance setting capabilities. It supports software and application pushing, patch management with WSUS integration, and mobile management with Intune Connector. Ivanti Security Controls is strong in patch management and vulnerability assessment, offering agentless scanning and comprehensive reporting that helps maintain endpoint security. It includes the capability to run PowerShell scripts and manage asset inventories, effectively identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring robust security.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from improved user interface design to enhance ease of navigation, compatibility enhancements for non-Windows environments, and better integration options with third-party software. Additionally, expanding cloud functionalities could prove beneficial. Ivanti Security Controls could improve by streamlining the user experience to make setup more accessible, enhancing cloud integration, and refining reporting features to ensure comprehensive insights. Its scripting capabilities might also benefit from a more intuitive configuration process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager relies on an on-premises deployment model, which necessitates substantial initial infrastructure investments but is paired with extensive documentation and support through its established network. Ivanti Security Controls offers flexible deployment options suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments. The support from Ivanti is efficient and focuses on providing agility.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager generally involves greater initial setup costs but promises ROI via enhanced integration and superior device management efficiency. In contrast, Ivanti Security Controls might have lower upfront costs with ROI realized through its strong security capabilities that help mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce potential security breach expenses. These differences stand out in the broader cost of integrated management offered by Microsoft versus the cost efficiency within security-centric environments from Ivanti.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 883,896 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Security Controls
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (6th), Configuration Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Security Controls is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 7.8%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager7.8%
Ivanti Security Controls2.5%
Other89.7%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Chethan R - PeerSpot reviewer
Chethan R
Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS
Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility
This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.
Read full review
NS
Narendar S
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized endpoint control has streamlined deployments and improved security compliance
In my experience, the best features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are software deployments and updates, OSD, hardware and software inventory, compliance and configuration baseline, reporting and monitoring, and integration with Intune hybrid management. These features make endpoint management efficient and scalable. The feature I rely on the most day-to-day is software deployment and patch management. It keeps endpoints updated and secure with minimal manual effort. Inventory and compliance monitoring are also important, but daily deployments are critical. Microsoft Configuration Manager has had a significant positive impact on our organization in several ways: improved efficiency, enhanced security and compliance, standardization, scalability, and visibility reporting. Overall, Microsoft Configuration Manager has helped us save time, reduce risk, improve operational efficiency, and maintain strong control over our endpoints. One of the biggest impacts Microsoft Configuration Manager has had on efficiency is the reduced manual work for software deployment and patching. For example, deploying a new application or security updates to hundreds or thousands of devices previously required several days of manual effort, including running scripts, checking devices individually, and validating installation. With Microsoft Configuration Manager, these tasks are automated and managed, allowing deployments to complete in hours rather than days. We also have automated reporting for deployment success and compliance which saved the IT team significant time that used to be spent gathering and reconciling inventory data from multiple tools.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."
"Technical support is helpful and responsive."
"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."
"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."
"Offers good patching."
"Technical support was helpful and responsive."
"It is a very well-rounded product. It is a complete package with all the features using which we are able to manage our PCs very efficiently."
"What's valuable is the basic management of the systems, being able to control who can access the systems."
"The cloud account management is a valuable feature."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager helps with patch management."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications."
"It gives us the ability to set up schedules, according to what our security requirements are, to automate the patching of our servers and desktops."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."
"It should be more scalable."
"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."
"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."
"I would like to see more automation."
"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."
"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
"It does seem a bit buggy from time to time."
"The solution is crowded with information."
"The main thing is that SCCM has to become an appliance instead of a server. When I say appliance, it has to come preconfigured so that it is drop-shipped into the enterprise and then you activate the feature sets that you want. It should pull down all the latest binaries. Once that is all there, it should have a discovery tool which goes out and discovers the assets within an enterprise. If the server, workstation, and applications are all coming from the same vendor, why not have the vendor do this work for us and automate it as much as it possibly can?"
"Management of Linux devices could be improved."
"It needs to be able to load faster during deployment."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."
"I rate the price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager an eight out of ten."
"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."
"We have to pay for a license."
"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."
"The price model is different for every client."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
883,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?
Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?
We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?
I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls
Compared 12% of the time
PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls Logo
PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls
Compared 10% of the time
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls
Compared 9% of the time
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Ivanti Security Controls Logo
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Ivanti Security Controls
Compared 9% of the time
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Ivanti Security Controls Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Ivanti Security Controls
Compared 8% of the time
More Ivanti Security Controls Competitors
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 7% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 4% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 2% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
February 2026
Ivanti Security Controls reportDownload Ivanti Security Controls product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
February 2026
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS
 

Overview

Ivanti Security Controls simplifies security with unified and automated prevention, detection, and response techniques that target your biggest attack vectors. It provides the security global experts agree creates the highest barriers to modern cyber attacks, including discovery, OS and application patch management, privilege management, and whitelisting.

Ivanti

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?
  • Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
  • Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
  • Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
  • Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
  • Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
  • Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
  • Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
  • Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.
What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?
  • Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
  • Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
  • Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
  • Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
  • Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
  • Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
February 2026
Free Report: Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
883,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ivanti Security Controls vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.