Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jama Connect vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Jama Connect support is responsive and knowledgeable, with room for improvement in license management tools and analysis capabilities.
Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText AccuRev's customer service is effective, but users suggest on-call support and enhanced documentation for quicker resolutions.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
Jama Connect offers improved scalability, but UI limitations and SSO issues impact handling large projects and third-party access.
Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText AccuRev is scalable and effective for diverse users, though efficiency may decline with simultaneous multiple user access.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Jama Connect is stable and reliable with minimal downtime and few glitches, achieving a seven out of ten rating.
Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText AccuRev is stable with minor bugs and occasional restarts; users hope for improvements but report few issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Jama Connect users seek UI modernization, improved functionality, better integrations, enhanced support, and stronger security with clearer pricing.
OpenText AccuRev requires stability, interface, and usability improvements, with better reporting, performance, training, and more competitive pricing suggested.
 

Setup Cost

Jama Connect offers adaptable pricing with flexible licensing, though some find it costly compared to competitors, especially for creative licenses.
 

Valuable Features

Jama Connect offers requirements management, traceability, integration, and analytics, improving productivity and compliance with an intuitive interface.
OpenText AccuRev is valued for ease of use, adaptability, integration, and source code management features in SDLC.
 

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (4th)
OpenText AccuRev
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
23rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

David Wilson - PeerSpot reviewer
Mainly used for requirements management, but its validation piece is not time-efficient at all
Like anything, Jama Connect relies highly on the company's culture because I found the whole review process to sound good, but it does not work in reality. Companies that use the tool are all pretty immature with requirements management, and therefore, they don't have the culture of doing that. You're always chasing them up and end up having review meetings, and no one pays attention to those review notices. The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all. It's very desktop verification and validation. You need to have it running and loading, which is not efficient. It's very cumbersome and overhead-intensive for verification management.
Sameh-Hablas - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization
To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jama Connect?
I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors.
What needs improvement with Jama Connect?
There are delays sometimes from the Jama Connect team in resolving issues. It's important to maintain and educate customers about the solutions they have.
What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?
Jama Connect is used to integrate solutions such as the Google App Store and Microsoft Azure. It provides single identity provider access, enabling Gmail access or Google access for users.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. OpenText AccuRev and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.