Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jamf Pro vs Relution comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Jamf Pro
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
1st
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
106
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (2nd)
Relution
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Application Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) category, the mindshare of Jamf Pro is 27.4%, up from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Relution is 4.2%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Device Management (MDM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pete C - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 6, 2023
Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture
Jamf Pro enables us to centrally manage nearly 1,000 Macs across multiple offices and US states, from optional installs that end users can implement at their own convenience, to mandatory applications and settings that must be enforced in a highly regulated industry.Jamf Pro is a critical part of…
Use Relution?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"JumpStart looks a little bit pricey; however, it is worth every penny."
"It seems fair. It could be a little bit less, but you have to pay for a product. You can't get something for free. You get what you pay for, so if you put in a little bit of money, you're going to get a good quality product."
"The cost of any licensing is certainly outweighed by the time saved from manually managing Apple devices."
"We have signed a licensing contract for three years. There is an option to buy an annual license subscription, but we opted for three years as it came with a 25% or 30% discount."
"JumpStart is available at an additional cost."
"The only thing that is kicking us a bit is the rand to the dollar exchange rate. It is priced in dollars. Every time the rand goes worse, it just costs more. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing because it is very unpredictable because of the rand to the dollar exchange rate."
"The cost of this solution is expensive but worth it."
"It would be beneficial if it could be reduced slightly."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jamf Pro?
The most valuable features of Jamf Pro for me are the device locator, which helps find missing iPads, and the ability to remotely manage and disable devices.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Pro?
Jamf Pro is considered a premium solution, and pricing can be a significant factor, especially in price-sensitive markets like India.
What needs improvement with Jamf Pro?
Jamf Pro should be standardized into one MDM product to make it more affordable and accessible. The App packaging process is time-consuming and could be improved. Additionally, the user interface i...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

JAMF Software Casper Suite
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Xero, National Geographic, Oxford University, Via, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Fallon, Cabela's
ZADtools, CLAAS, Flintgroup, ...
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM). Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.