Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Jamf Pro based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), Microsoft 365 Business, and Kandji.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
JAMF Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with JAMF, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is praised for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, offering solid integration capabilities and ease of use. In comparison, Jamf Pro provides extensive features, deep macOS integration, and superior customer service resources, making it ideal for Apple environments but at a higher cost.
Jamf Pro excels in seamless macOS and iOS management and features automated patch management and strong security. In comparison, Microsoft 365 Business is recognized for its comprehensive applications, cross-platform usability, and integrated cloud services, making it attractive for its breadth and integration capabilities across different platforms.
Jamf Pro's comprehensive tools cater to enterprises needing extensive security and integration with Apple products. In comparison, Kandji's automation and quick deployment appeal to those seeking innovative ease. Jamf Pro suits detailed setups, while Kandji attracts with cost-effective flexibility.
Jamf Pro features a straightforward setup with clear upfront costs, while Kandji offers a seamless integration experience with competitive initial fees.
Jamf Pro features a straightforward setup with clear upfront costs, while Kandji offers a seamless integration experience with competitive initial fees.
Jamf Pro is preferred for Apple device management with features like zero-touch deployment. In comparison, BMC Client Management excels in asset and multi-platform management. Jamf Pro users suggest better Windows integration, whereas BMC Client Management users need improved mobile support and third-party tool integration.
Jamf Pro excels in comprehensive device management features specifically for Apple products. In comparison, Windows Autopilot is valued for its seamless integration with Microsoft services. Tech buyers might choose Jamf Pro for Apple-centric environments or Windows Autopilot for robust Microsoft ecosystem integration.
Jamf Pro has a setup cost that includes a comprehensive range of features, while Windows Autopilot requires less initial investment making it a budget-friendly option.
Jamf Pro has a setup cost that includes a comprehensive range of features, while Windows Autopilot requires less initial investment making it a budget-friendly option.
Hexnode UEM attracts tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and strong customer support, making it ideal for diverse platform management. In comparison, Jamf Pro appeals to those needing advanced Apple integration and features, justifying its higher cost for specialized Apple ecosystem solutions.
Hexnode UEM typically has a lower setup cost compared to Jamf Pro, which can lead to initial savings. However, Jamf Pro offers more comprehensive features, justifying its higher setup expense for businesses in need of advanced solutions.
Hexnode UEM typically has a lower setup cost compared to Jamf Pro, which can lead to initial savings. However, Jamf Pro offers more comprehensive features, justifying its higher setup expense for businesses in need of advanced solutions.
