Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JFrog Xray vs Qualys TotalCloud comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
6th
Ranking in Container Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), Compliance Management (3rd)
JFrog Xray
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
24th
Ranking in Container Security
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)
Qualys TotalCloud
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
13th
Ranking in Container Security
11th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (10th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (10th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th)
 

Featured Reviews

Andrew W - PeerSpot reviewer
Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues
Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.
Mokshi Pandita - PeerSpot reviewer
An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project
We could create any number of repositories, but we can create only thirty projects with JFrog Xray. If I want things to work, it has to be one project and multiple repositories that belong to different real projects. So I have a limitation of thirty projects, despite being a premium customer. JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard. Although I am able to generate reports, there is no proper dashboard where I can see the total number of vulnerabilities, the total number of license issues, and how many vulnerabilities are fixed. Second, I found the shift left approach missing with JFrog Xray. JFrog Xray has integration with IDEs, but it does not tell you about the vulnerabilities until the artifact is created. However, Snyk could directly integrate with your repository and would not allow you to build unless you fix the problem.
Vikasha Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to mitigate and prioritize risks, ultimately reducing our attack surface for critical assets
TotalCloud provides written explanations that guide remediation and eliminate risk. We have used Qualys for over ten years, and TotalCloud and TruRisk for the last two to three years, successfully leveraging their benefits. Our technical account manager is responsive to our requests for additional features or suggestions, ensuring our needs are met. I would rate the helpfulness of written explanations compared to visualizations of attack paths a nine out of ten. The explanations effectively detail how the scores are derived, making them verifiable and useful for regulatory audits. This allows us to clearly justify the chosen approach and the tool's output. Qualys TotalCloud has significantly benefited our organization by reducing our vulnerability count and overall team size. The platform's user-friendly interface has streamlined management, eliminating the need for additional staff and enabling us to efficiently handle our workload. With the support of our technical account manager and their team, we saw initial benefits within a month, achieving full utilization within six months due to the minimal learning curve. TotalCloud provides a single, prioritized view of risk. We are also evaluating Qualys' new Enterprise Threat Management module, part of their enterprise risk platform, recently launched at the Qualys Security Conference. While we are still assessing this module, the dashboards are well-designed, configurable, and useful. The single, prioritized view of risk has significantly streamlined our workload by consolidating multiple sources, resulting in an estimated 60 percent reduction in effort due to the tool's prioritization capabilities. Our use of TruRisk allows us to effectively justify our risk management processes to regulators and auditors. The system provides clear and verifiable risk assessments, which facilitates a smooth audit process and ensures compliance with regulatory requirements. The comprehensiveness of range of risk found by TruRisk Insights is an eight out of ten. The TruRisk Insights feature has helped us identify assets with high vulnerability scores, significantly impacting our business by enabling us to mitigate and prioritize risks, ultimately reducing our attack surface for critical assets. Previously, we applied the same logic to all assets, but TruRisk now allows us to pinpoint the areas of maximum risk and prioritize our efforts accordingly. We've improved our security posture by 30 to 40 percent and reduced our attack surface, consistently maintaining good security scores, such as our Bitsight Security Rating, since implementing Qualys TruRisk over two years ago.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"The most valuable feature is the easy-to-understand user interface, which allows even non-technical users to comprehend and resolve issues."
"I recommend SentinelOne due to its high-security capabilities, which are essential to safeguard data and systems from potential threats."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"The tool identifies issues quickly."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"We mostly use alerts. That has been pretty good. If we use the alert system from Amazon, it is much costlier to us, so we use PingSafe."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."
"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."
"The most valuable feature is the consolidated information that it provides from various platforms."
"The dashboards are particularly valuable as they offer a comprehensive view of the environment, highlighting any misconfigurations."
"I would rate Qualys TotalCloud ten out of ten."
"TotalCloud provides a single, prioritized view of risk."
"One of the most valuable features of Qualys TotalCloud is FlexScan, which is specifically for internet-facing VMs. We found this feature to be very useful. It was a key differentiator for us."
"The most valuable feature is extensibility."
"One of the features I appreciate is the ability to generate daily reports without relying on anyone else."
"The scalability is good as well. I would rate it ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"One potential drawback is the cost of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may be prohibitive for smaller businesses or startups, particularly those in regions with lower average incomes, such as India."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"SentinelOne currently lacks a break glass account feature, which is critical for implementing Single Sign-On."
"For SentinelOne, improvements could be made in managing Internet dependency as cloud-based operations can pose challenges in environments with limited connectivity."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"The area of improvement is the cost, which is high compared to other traditional endpoint protections."
"PingSafe filtering has some areas that cause problems, and to achieve single sign-on functionality, a break-glass feature, which is currently unavailable, is necessary."
"The out-of-the-box PostgreSQL provided is not stable, which is why we are considering enterprise support."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"Although TotalCloud is a helpful tool, some of its advanced features are still under development."
"There is room for improvement in vulnerability scanning, particularly for PaaS environments. Currently, Qualys does not have full access to these instances, which limits its effectiveness."
"Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA."
"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations."
"Qualys TotalCloud needs to improve its accuracy for non-Windows operating systems."
"With the growing integration of AI, I would like Qualys to enhance its service offerings to better accommodate AI-related risks."
"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations. This shortcoming means we must rely on SCCM when any service stack updates or additional prerequisites are needed."
"Their customer support needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cost-effective."
"SentinelOne offers excellent pricing and licensing options."
"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."
"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
"PingSafe falls somewhere in the middle price range, neither particularly cheap nor expensive."
"The features included in PingSafe justify its price point."
Information not available
"Qualys TotalCloud offers competitive pricing given its comprehensive suite of features, including integration, assessment, remediation, and detection capabilities, all within a single platform."
"Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility."
"The pricing for TotalCloud is attractive and competitive in the market. Given the features, especially the dashboard, I have no concerns regarding pricing."
"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."
"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches."
"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."
"As a middle management member, I do not have direct pricing knowledge, but based on the knowledge from our meetings, its pricing is competitive."
"While Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive and may soon be considered overpriced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
SentinelOne is relatively cheap. If ten is the most expensive, I would rate it a seven.
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
The areas with room for improvement include the cost, which is higher compared to other security platforms. The dashb...
What do you like most about JFrog Xray?
JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.
What needs improvement with JFrog Xray?
X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL. More support ...
What is your primary use case for JFrog Xray?
Our primary use case for X-ray includes multiple activities such as security and vulnerability scanning. We already u...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?
Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products.
What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?
In TotalCloud, I would suggest improvements in policy checks to cater to various inventory types like VPCs, subnets, ...
What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?
We use TotalCloud for CSPM or Cloud Security Posture Management. We have integrated our cloud accounts with TotalClou...
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
JFrog Security Essentials
Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Xray vs. Qualys TotalCloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.