Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

KerioControl vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.8
KerioControl offers comprehensive security, ease of use, reliable VPN, and a user-friendly interface for efficient management and protection.
No sentiment score available
The most valuable features include geo-tagging, which blocks all other IPs except for the specified accounts, and web filtering.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
KerioControl needs improvements in VPN, user interface, support, performance, diagnostics, scalability, reliability, licensing, and logging features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
KerioControl offers reliable performance with robust security for small to medium enterprises, despite minor hardware and configuration issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.9
KerioControl is ideal for small to medium businesses, offering robust features but may require upgrades for extensive scaling.
No sentiment score available
KerioControl has met some of the network infrastructure needs yet could improve in terms of scalability.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
KerioControl's support is responsive yet sometimes delayed, with users desiring faster response times and fewer additional charges.
No sentiment score available
I have never needed to contact customer support as the product is easy to use.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
10.0
KerioControl is affordable with robust features, though some find the licensing model complex and renewal costs concerning.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

KerioControl
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (27th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (11th)
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of KerioControl is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Constantnos Achilleos - PeerSpot reviewer
Leveraging geo-tagging and web filtering for enhanced network security
The solution is used for site-to-site VPN connections and it is valued for its cost efficiency and easy connectivity. It is especially beneficial for multi-site VPNs and is used in about fifteen different components KerioControl has provided a financial benefit as it allows purchasing one license…
Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects from attacks in real-time and provides accurate threat intelligence updates
I rate the ease of setup a seven or eight out of ten. The platform functions very well. We need technical support to make improvements to the platform. The deployment takes eight months. We need two or three system engineers and one electronic engineer specialized in Trellix platforms to deploy the tool. We need only one system engineer to maintain the product.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Media Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KerioControl?
The solution provides feasibility regarding cyber privacy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioControl?
KerioControl's pricing is reasonable. The license for KerioControl is annual. It's difficult to specify an exact cost since it varies depending on the number of users and additional software combin...
What needs improvement with KerioControl?
I would like to see geo-IP filtering added to the filtering rules. Incorporating these rules would be very beneficial if you have different ideas or reasons to filter, such as communication to the ...
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Network Threat Behavior Analysis must be improved. The technical support must be improved. The support team must provide better help with configurations of devices and enabling NTBA.
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Triton Technical, McDonald's
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about KerioControl vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.