LambdaTest vs Qt Squish comparison

LambdaTest and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6. LambdaTest holds a 1.8% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 25 LambdaTest reviews

1,929 Views
1,295 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 19 Qt Squish reviews

2,637 Views
1,420 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Qt Squish based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,660 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 1.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LambdaTest supports multiple platforms like iOS across different devices and enables real-time testing."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

More LambdaTest pros

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

Cons

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."

"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."

"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

More LambdaTest cons

"The price could be better."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

42%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

I used the product for free because I subscribed to LinkedIn Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 67% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Bitbar vs LambdaTest

Compared 1% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs Qt Squish

Compared 2% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

November 2024

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

November 2024

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

No data available

froglogic Squish

Learn More

LambdaTest

Qt Group

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

October 2024

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.