No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Luxul Switches vs Meraki MS Switches comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Luxul Switches
Ranking in Ethernet Switches
28th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AV Over IP Switching (3rd)
Meraki MS Switches
Ranking in Ethernet Switches
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Luxul Switches is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Meraki MS Switches is 2.5%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Ethernet Switches Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Meraki MS Switches2.5%
Luxul Switches1.1%
Other96.4%
Ethernet Switches
 

Featured Reviews

PK
Owner/Operator at KPax Audio Video - Networking & Security Surveillance
Greatly simplifies troubleshooting; remote access to the router is a huge time saver
The solution has a problem with documentation. Luxul doesn't want to give the documentation to any Joe Bloggs, but even as a dealer going to the Luxul portal, there are no documents. I can always call technical support and ask them if I forget something and I'll get the support, but I shouldn't need to do that. Anything can be improved and unfortunately a good switch is not cheap but there's no choice if you need a special router.
Thanadesh Namuengrak - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead IT Specialist at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Cloud-managed switches have improved secure segmentation and simplified automated patching
Meraki MS Switches are easy to manage, but I believe they are more suitable for use on the IT side because Meraki faces the internet, requiring an open connection through the internet for control. It is not the same as Cisco switches, which operate via command line. I normally use command line for configuration, while Meraki utilizes a cloud-based dashboard that necessitates a constant internet connection for configuration. Therefore, I find Meraki MS Switches more suitable for the IT side. The improvement needed for Meraki MS Switches is the ability to connect in the worst case when I encounter internet issues. When I cannot connect to the internet and need to configure or connect directly to Cisco switches or access Meraki for changes, I face difficulties. When Meraki MS Switches can be configured without an internet connection, I think I can use Meraki MS Switches on the OT side. The only improvement I seek is configuration without an internet connection.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is excellent for audio-video and multi-casting."
"The solution is less expensive than other options."
"All of my customers, including residential and commercial clients, are extremely happy with these switches."
"It's a rock-solid connectivity and a rock-solid Wi-Fi coverage, which is what my customers love."
"The ePoE+ is great."
"Remote access to the router is a huge time saver."
"This is a sophisticated product with easy configuration that can save time and effort."
"It's reliable and I advise others to use it."
"The management is cloud-based so you do not have to be on-premises to work with it."
"It is easy to configure and claim the switches by their serial number directly from the portal."
"The solution is very stable."
"The setup was as easy as a setup can be, we had no issues."
"I have found the solution to be stable."
"Console of the dashboard is well integrated."
 

Cons

"While the solution is good for the light commercial market or for the residential market, it's not ideal for the commercial market, for example, a big enterprise or data center."
"The solution has a problem with documentation. Luxul doesn't want to give the documentation to any Joe Bloggs, but even as a dealer going to the Luxul portal, there are no documents."
"The documentation could be improved; it's quite basic."
"Documentation and access to it could be greatly improved."
"You do need to be an IT person in order to handle the initial setup. An AV person would struggle a bit."
"Performance is an area in need of improvement. Other systems, such as Juniper switches, perform better for the same or less money."
"The solution needs to improve its scalability."
"The technical support for this product is difficult to deal with. With multiple levels, it is very difficult to get through to the right person that can help with the problem."
"The solution isn't scalable."
"The price of Meraki MS Switches should come down, particularly for the Layer 3 switch, which is the most expensive switch."
"There was an issue with the uplink when the port was removed and had to be reinstalled, which caused a temporary dropout."
"Meraki requires more models, especially with respect to PoE Switches, to support Wi-Fi 6 capabilities."
"The firewall is not very powerful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price completely depends on the environment. There are no additional fees."
"When you compare it to other switches like HP, Juniper, and Ruckus, Meraki MS Switches are cheaper."
"It depends on what type of equipment you have and other things. We're about $17,000 a year."
"Extreme switches are more cost-effective than Cisco Meraki Switches."
"It is very expensive so I want it to be cheaper."
"The licensing is purchased on a one, three, five, and seven year basis."
"With the solution that we currently have, I think it costs about 1,200 pounds a year. They bill on a yearly basis."
"We paid for our switches outright, at a cost of between $15,000 USD and $18,000 USD."
"My company pays for Meraki MS Switches yearly. Pricing-wise, the product is relatively inexpensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Healthcare Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Performing Arts
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business54
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Meraki MS Switches?
Meraki MS Switches are easy to manage, but I believe they are more suitable for use on the IT side because Meraki faces the internet, requiring an open connection through the internet for control. ...
What is your primary use case for Meraki MS Switches?
I have experience with Cisco products as I implement a lot of them. For example, I implemented switches and access points when I worked for infrastructure in a motorcycle company, and I implemented...
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS220, MS320, MS420
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cisco Live Milan, Hyatt
Find out what your peers are saying about Luxul Switches vs. Meraki MS Switches and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.