ManageEngine OpManager vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

920 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Pandora FMS are key competitors in the IT monitoring field. ManageEngine OpManager appears to have an upper hand due to its advanced alerting system and extensive network device monitoring capabilities, although Pandora FMS is favored for its all-in-one approach and protocol support flexibility.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers robust real-time alerting, extensive network device monitoring, and automates IT management environments effectively. Its ability to manage up to 5000 network ports enhances capacity management. Pandora FMS provides seamless monitoring of networks, servers, and applications with compatibility for various protocols, agentless monitoring, and user-customizable options.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager can improve in change control management, stability during upgrades, and intuitive dashboard design. It also lacks machine learning integration and can strengthen its technical support. Pandora FMS needs better cloud deployment options, a more extensive support community, and a simpler initial setup process, with enhanced real-time monitoring options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager is typically deployed on-premises and offers a range of support experiences but seeks improvements in response times and expertise. Its structured support is noted, but problem resolution is slower. Pandora FMS offers both on-premises and cloud deployment, with customer service praised for its efficiency and politeness, though more direct communication channels for complex issues are desired.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager's pricing is competitive, though opinions on cost vary, with discounts for other ManageEngine products easing budget strains for some. Its operational savings and efficiency gains are perceived as cost-effective. Pandora FMS has a straightforward licensing model, with its open-source version providing significant functionality for restricted budgets, yielding immediate ROI through effective system monitoring and reduced downtimes.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: March 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 842,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

47th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (43rd), Log Management (44th), Cloud Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.4%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager makes it easy to monitor all the network alerts on the application."

"The solution gives pretty good network visibility. I am also impressed with it's monitoring."

"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."

"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."

"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."

"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."

"If you have a ton of devices, it might slow down a bit."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface."

"The licensing model is confusing."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

49%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 41% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 26% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 24% of the time

Nagios XI vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

ManageEngine OpManager

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pandora FMS