Microsoft Azure API Management vs Tyk comparison

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 6 Tyk reviews

2,317 Views
1,847 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Tyk compete in the API management space. Microsoft Azure API Management holds an advantage due to its robust support and integration capabilities, whereas Tyk shines with its extensive feature set, appealing to businesses prioritizing feature depth.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management offers seamless integration with Azure services, advanced security features, and a comprehensive analytics platform. Tyk is highly customizable with open-source components, strong multi-cloud support, and developer-friendly tools.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could improve in its cost structure for non-Azure users and flexibility in deployment options outside the Azure ecosystem. Tyk needs to streamline certain functionalities that are still maturing, enhance its scalability, and refine its UI/UX design to meet user expectations effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tyk offers flexible deployment options with cloud and on-premises solutions and is known for prompt customer service. Microsoft Azure API Management is easily deployable within the Azure ecosystem and offers extensive documentation and resources for support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management utilizes a pay-as-you-go pricing model, beneficial for existing Azure customers due to integration efficiencies. Tyk provides competitive pricing with its open-source version and scalable pricing tiers, potentially offering significant cost savings and high ROI, particularly for startups and mid-sized businesses focusing on its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Tyk Report (Updated: April 2025).

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Tyk

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 17.9%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tyk is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian

Specialist PCC at Danfoss

Efficiently manages and monetizes API

It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.

Read full review

MarkDoherty

Founding Director at Point Group

Fastest to get up and running and fewer idiosyncrasies than competitors

In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them. But as a product, it's very difficult to find any major faults.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user management is pretty seamless."

"The Azure Active Directory Synchronization is quite good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its importing and publishing."

"The API management and the hosting of the API platform are great."

"The tool is very easy to use and manage APIs."

"Microsoft Azure API Management serves as a gateway for all API management within our tech environment and is a basic part of our DevOps toolchain."

"We're pretty much using all of the monetizations features out of the API manager so we can put up a portal and have a dev portal and then a prod portal and do rate limiting."

"The integration and API Connect are valuable when we need to connect with web services and REST APIs."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

"It is a good product for API management."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

Cons

"Documentations for implementing certain product features are very difficult to find"

"I would like to see better scalability and better performance."

"The solution's integration suite needs improvement."

"Previously, our company's cloud services were shut down, and we used to take more time to update services, so such issues are areas where improvements are needed."

"It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature."

"From my understanding, there are some constraints around governance and service-to-service intercommunication managing priorities and our own governance."

"Security could be improved."

"The cloud deployment performance could be better."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The developer and standard pricing tiers of Azure API Management are very competitive compared to other products."

"Azure is a pay-as-you-go model. You build out your virtual environment and pay a monthly price depending on CPU cores, storage, etc."

"It costs around 30,000 Kronas a month, which translates to about $3,000 dollars monthly."

"The licensing fees are expensive."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure API Management is publicly available and goes from a developer edition that costs $26 to $30 per month. It may have changed, but it's in the neighborhood of $30 per month. I believe there's also the enterprise edition, which is highly capable and costs $2,500 per month."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, it's around $3.50 per user per month. If you want a DevOps integration, it's about $7.50 per user per month. Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all three flavors for $7.50 per user per month."

"The solution appears cheaper because it's a cloud SaaS model."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

What do you like most about Tyk?

The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?

The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes do...

What needs improvement with Tyk?

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 20% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 16% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

3scale API Management vs Tyk

Compared 6% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure API Management

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Download Tyk product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Tyk