Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

"The most valuable feature of the solution is traffic management."

"In my experience, Microsoft products have a smooth integration and facilitate easy management and monitoring. Using Azure Application Gateway allows us to efficiently handle the system loads."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway gives us a lot of benefits, including domain mapping."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"The solution's integration is very good."

"I like the tool's stability and performance."

"Azure Application Gateway's most valuable feature is ease of use. The configuration is straightforward. It isn't difficult to adjust the size of your instances in the settings. You can do that with a few clicks, and the configuration file is the same way. You can also set rules and policies with minimal time and effort."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"The solution is stable."

"It is fully automated."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."

"The product could be easier to use and implement."

"Microsoft needs to work on their documentation."

"The solution is easy to use overall, but the dashboard could be updated with a better layout and graphical design so that we can see the data a bit easier. Microsoft could also add more documentation. The documentation Microsoft provides doesn't tell us about resource requirements. We found that the instances we had weren't sufficient to support the firewall, so we had to increase them."

"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."

"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."

"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-go."

"The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."

"It is an expensive solution. We have an enterprise agreement, it is monthly."

"There is some additional cost, such as extended support."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a pretty affordable product. My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. The additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution vary."

"The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."

"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"The pricing is okay."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."