Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

"The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs."

"It does an excellent job of load balancing."

"I find Application Gateway’s WAF module valuable because it helps prevent layer 7 attacks."

"Using policies to link and manage these URL-based routing configurations is also valuable."

"In my experience, Microsoft products have a smooth integration and facilitate easy management and monitoring. Using Azure Application Gateway allows us to efficiently handle the system loads."

"The solution integrates different applications and APIs securely, enhancing overall security and network optimization."

"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."

"It is a scalable solution...The installation phase of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very easy."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"It is fully automated."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"The monitoring on the solution could be better."

"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."

"The security of the product could be adjusted."

"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."

"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."

"The tool is a pain to deal with when it comes to the area of configuration."

"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."

"It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a pretty affordable product. My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. The additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution vary."

"The product is not expensive."

"Every solution comes with a license and cost. Microsoft provides the license and the total cost is for the maintenance every year."

"It is not expensive."

"The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-go."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has less price than other application gateway solutions."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The pricing is okay."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."