Microsoft Entra ID vs UserLock comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and IS Decisions are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while IS Decisions is ranked #29. Microsoft holds a 5.6% mindshare in AS, compared to IS Decisions’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IS Decisions users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

UserLock and Microsoft Entra ID provide identity and access management solutions. Microsoft Entra ID appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, making it more suitable for large-scale implementations.

Features: UserLock is valued for its ease of use, seamless integration with existing systems, and affordability. Microsoft Entra ID offers advanced security protocols, a broader functionality, and a comprehensive feature set, making it robust and versatile.

Room for Improvement: UserLock could enhance its detailed reporting, advanced customization, and scalability. Microsoft Entra ID could improve by simplifying certain features, offering clearer documentation, and enhancing its user interface. Both products have specific areas for refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UserLock is praised for quick, hassle-free deployment and responsive customer service. Microsoft Entra ID, though more complex to deploy, benefits from extensive Microsoft support services, providing users with an array of support resources.

Pricing and ROI: UserLock is cost-effective and provides a quick return on investment. Microsoft Entra ID, while more expensive, justifies its higher cost with a comprehensive features set, providing a worthwhile ROI for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,714 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Duo

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Cisco Duo is 3.7%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 5.6%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UserLock is 1.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID	5.6%
Cisco Duo	3.7%
UserLock	1.1%
Other	89.6%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Charles Slaustas

Information Technology Contractor at Insight global

Supports seamless authentication for users across multiple organizations and personal portals

The features I use in Cisco Duo include Duo Pushes to confirm my identity to the device, and eventually as MFA security was increased, I actually had to use exchange passcodes. Sometimes, I have to go into the site and get into Cisco Duo to retrieve the passcode, and many of them have been two-factor, where the sites send a passcode that I have to enter into Cisco Duo. It has been more of the latter. I have not seen issues with lagging or crashing on Cisco Duo's end; it was usually on the client end, often because someone set up a bad upgrade or there were connection issues with the Cisco Duo cloud through the administrative site.

Read full review

Stafin Jacob

Microsoft 365 Security & Compliance Practice Lead at Invoke

Identity has become our central gatekeeper and has provided secure single sign-on for all users

Microsoft Entra ID can improve by focusing more on new passwordless methods and becoming a primary adopter. One feature we would like to see is the ability to have security questions for password resets. I know the current capability is phasing out, so we do not have an alternative method yet. Customers who already use security questions require a smoother transition for that capability to be available. My experience with the deployment has had some challenges, particularly around the Microsoft MFA campaigns. The hardest part is moving users from a different MFA provider to the Microsoft MFA provider, as it ultimately depends on user activity. In large enterprises with numerous users across various geographies, this transition takes time. If there are ways to exert more control around that process, it would improve the situation.

Read full review

it_user1816350

IT Manager at Xcel Mechanical Systems

The user login insights are helpful

We needed a simple solution to enable admin multi-factor authentication on our internal Windows network, and a consultant recommended UserLock because he had previously implemented it at another company. UserLock also monitors logins on all tracked devices, telling you if the sign-in was successful…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The seamless integration of Cisco Duo into our platforms has been easy, and it has been reliable as well."

"Once you break that curve, it gives end users a sense of security where they know that if they're trying to sign on to Office 365 or some other application, they need to authenticate with Duo to make sure that they have the multi-factor authentication."

"Cisco Duo is the added security layer in our overall identity and access management environment; it's the cornerstone of identity for us."

"The most valuable aspect is the authentication and the SSO."

"The dashboard is intuitive, allowing my help desk team and the security team to identify issues with one click."

"For one of my clients, the ROI was somewhere between 25 to 27 percent in year one."

"Right now, I do not think there is anything about Cisco Duo that I would improve; I have been happy with everything so far."

"It's simple. It's reliable. I haven't had any issues with it."

More Cisco Duo pros

"The most valuable feature of Azure AD is its ability to connect with services outside of Microsoft, although documentation is necessary to properly implement these connections."

"The implementations of Microsoft Entra ID have controlled all of our access into a single platform, which has been great."

"The most valuable features of this solution are definitely the authorization and authentication, and the rule-based user validation."

"Every feature in Microsoft Entra ID plays a crucial role in overall security."

"The most valuable feature is the possibility to create multi-tenant applications alone, or in combination with Azure Active Directory B2C."

"It's definitely both stable and scalable."

"Our current experience with Azure in the Cloud - Azure Active Directory - is it's very functional and productive in talking about identity and access management solutions."

"Microsoft Entra ID has had a very positive impact because access can be controlled both internally and externally to the environment and applications used by the organization."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The most valuable features are two-factor authentication and real-time logon monitoring."

"It is affordable, integrates easily with Active Directory, and is simple to install and maintain."

"We mainly implemented UserLock for multi-factor authentication, but the user login insights are also nice."

"UserLock was pretty easy to set up and simple to use, and the documentation covered everything."

Cons

"For the next release, Cisco Duo could be improved by adding touchless authentication and biometric features."

"It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird."

"However, I need to look into Cisco Duo; I had not realized they had an email aspect."

"We had a lot of trouble configuring the password reset function, and as a result we now have a second channel that bypasses Duo to allow users to reset their password."

"The only time I really had some negative feedback for them was about the UI of their mobile app, but they improved it in the last version. It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. If you are on a monthly term or a yearly contract, you basically pay the same price, and that is very unusual. Normally, there is a discount when someone signs up for the 12-month system."

"We have a 24 hour timer for our Duo cookie and we would like to reduce this to a shorter time when using Duo."

"The pricing for Cisco Duo is kind of okay, but most of the time, your competitor is someone like Microsoft who gives it out for free with their offering, making it tough to argue with customers why they should spend additional dollars to also get Duo to improve their setup, but I think the pricing is fair."

"Often, people do not receive expiration messages, and sometimes, for security reasons, accounts get disabled without notifying the end user, so they mistakenly think something has gone wrong when it really just needs to be re-enabled on the external system."

More Cisco Duo cons

"I would like it to be easier to integrate third-party applications."

"Overall, it's not a very intuitive solution."

"Azure Active Directory could be made easier to use. We have large amounts of data and storage. We are looking for video files and media content for applications, we will think about options, such as cloud storage or a CDN."

"Azure AD does not support legacy authentication protocols, such as NTLM or Kerberos."

"The integration between the Azure active directory and the traditional active directory could be improved upon."

"Azure AD could be more robust and adopt a saturated model, where they can offer unlimited support for a multi-cloud environment."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"Microsoft Entra ID can be improved by having more resources for learning how to best use the tool and understanding best use case scenarios. The learning curve is challenging, so I would appreciate seeing a training portal that is easier to use."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"The product and service are already great as it is but if I could add one feature, I guess it would be nice to have another factor of authentication (two additional factors) like your phone and a token for example, for when people forget their phone at home."

"I would like to see UserLock add the ability to automatically create a group policy in Active Directory. That might streamline the setup process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It falls in line with everything else."

"My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Cisco Duo has been great. We've been there for 10 years. While we haven't gone through the setup part for a while, licensing is straightforward and convenient for higher education because student populations are included. So, we don't have to pay extra for it. We just pay for our knowledge workers, which has been great, and the cost is reasonable."

"You pay per user when using this solution and the pricing is fair."

"It's a bit confusing because we're on a three-year plan with a certain number of licenses, and we've gone over that number. They told us that when we renew, they will add all these licenses. We've expanded quickly, so everyone's kind of scared because no one knows what the bill is with the long pricing cycle."

"My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good, with no issues. I am pleased that the prices remained stable after Cisco acquired the solution."

"It is affordable for what's coming to the table with it, but in this day and age, the cost is looked at under a microscope, and companies need to very finely define what is needed versus what is critical. In some cases, it might not be cost-effective for a company to have it. In a lot of other cases, it is the cost of doing business."

"During testing we are allowed a certain number of licenses for free."

"I only need the solution for IT staff, which makes it relatively cheap. If I deployed it for the whole company, it would be costly, so it depends on the number of users. Duo Security is affordable compared to other products in the segment."

More Cisco Duo pricing and cost advice

"It is bundled with other services and the pricing is quite reasonable."

"It is very expensive. Its price should be lower. Price is the most important factor for Turkish people."

"I'd recommend Azure Active Directory if you are a big company. For small or medium companies, it's probably not the best idea in the world because of the pricing. If you are a small company, you can probably deploy your own solutions because you're not handling a website with tons of traffic. If you are not like Adidas, Nike, or Walmart, you can do it in a way that is more localized than handling everything through a big price solution. However, Azure tends to provide you with solutions that are easier to use. If it was cheaper, I'd definitely recommend going for it."

"Microsoft Entra ID's pricing is reasonable."

"The E5 plan we are using contains the premium plans for Azure Active Directory. We are not paying only for the Azure Active Directory Premium licenses. We have it already included within our E5 plan."

"Its price is okay. It is easy to go from P1 to P2 license. It is not exactly a bargain, but I would recommend the P2 license."

"Entra ID is not too bad, but Microsoft licensing generally is insane. Most customers normally buy a bundle license with Microsoft 365, E3, or E5. Out of our 2,000 customers, for 99.9% of our customers, the Entra ID license that they are getting through the part of that would be sufficient. There are some more advanced ones that give you a bit more functionality, but we probably have not had a customer for that. We do not even internally use that ourselves. When you buy the Entra ID license on its own, it is probably three or four pounds. You just get it included in the license."

"As a nonprofit, we have A5 licenses for nonprofits in education, so we at least have some reduced costs."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"You will be hard-pressed to find better pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

19%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	66
Midsize Enterprise	29
Large Enterprise	93

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	91
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	162

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Du...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Duo Security?

Regarding the pricing, what actually happened was that we got the product purchased through our HQ, so the costing as...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Duo Security?

I do not have a straight answer for how Cisco Duo can be improved at this time. With the implementation that we are g...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

I primarily use Microsoft Entra ID's free tier, so I have not faced any issues with pricing; I hope this free tie...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory?

To improve Microsoft Entra ID, I believe it should be openable with third-party applications to use Microsoft Authent...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Active Directory?

My main use case for Microsoft Entra ID is the authentication of M365, Azure, and third-party applications like Sales...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Cisco Duo

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

SAASPASS vs Cisco Duo

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco Duo Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 23% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 3% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 2% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs UserLock

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs UserLock

Compared 4% of the time

Identity Manager by One Identity vs UserLock

Compared 4% of the time

Idira Identity vs UserLock

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs UserLock

Compared 4% of the time

More UserLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Duo

November 2026

Download Cisco Duo product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

October 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

October 2026

Download UserLock product report

Also Known As

Duo Security

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Cisco

Microsoft

Demo not available

IS Decisions

Overview

Cisco Duo is a cloud-based identity security platform safeguarding critical resources for any user and device worldwide. Known for its ease of use, Duo offers seamless protection across multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments.

Cisco Duo is designed to secure access with identity-first protection and provides extensive visibility throughout an organization's identity ecosystem. Offering multi-factor authentication, Duo facilitates easy integration and management, allowing teams to protect data effectively on VPNs, applications, and networks. Its single-pane management improves security processes while enhancing trust, making it suitable for diverse IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Cisco Duo?

Multi-factor Authentication: Strengthens user verification with multiple methods.
Push Notifications: Simplifies authentication with quick approvals.
Single Sign-On: Enhances convenience by allowing one set of credentials.
VPN Access: Secures remote connections with reliable authentication.
User Activity Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights into access patterns.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Quick Deployment: Facilitates rapid integration within existing systems.
Effective Management: Streamlines IT operations with centralized control.
Regulatory Compliance: Aids in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Enhanced Trust: Strengthens security posture across networks.
User-friendly Approach: Simplifies authentication for non-technical users.

In industries like education and finance, Cisco Duo is widely employed to secure multi-factor authentication across platforms such as email, databases, and servers. Its integration capabilities with Microsoft 365, Active Directory, and VPNs like AnyConnect are instrumental in verifying user identities using mobile apps or OTPs, catering effectively to both remote and on-premise environments.

Cisco

Microsoft Entra ID offers advanced identity management capabilities, ensuring security and efficiency with features like single sign-on and multifactor authentication.

Designed for hybrid environments, Microsoft Entra ID provides seamless synchronization between on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory, enhancing security with multifactor authentication and conditional access. By integrating with a broad spectrum of cloud services, it supports user authentication and mobile device management, facilitating streamlined application registration and secure API access.

What are the most notable features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Robust Security Measures: Implements strong security protocols to protect identities.
Single Sign-On: Enables users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
Conditional Access Policies: Provides a framework to control access based on predefined conditions.
Third-Party Integration: Ensures compatibility with external applications for comprehensive use.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances protection against unauthorized access through advanced security features.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines the process of integrating new users and systems.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces identity and access management workload, boosting productivity.

In finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra ID plays a crucial role in managing access to sensitive information while maintaining compliance with industry regulations. Retail and manufacturing sectors leverage its capabilities for secure supply chain operations and partner collaboration.

Microsoft

UserLock provides advanced IAM for Microsoft Active Directory environments, ensuring secure logins for corporate networks and SaaS applications across various environments, including offline or remote settings.

UserLock enhances security by integrating multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and context-aware access controls without disrupting existing Active Directory structures. Administrators enjoy real-time visibility and control, preventing account misuse, managing user sessions effectively, and maintaining security standards for compliance requirements like ISO 27001, HIPAA, and NIS2.

What are the most important features of UserLock?

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enhances security by requiring additional verification methods.
Single Sign-On (SSO): Simplifies access across multiple applications with a single login credential.
Context-Aware Access Controls: Provides security measures based on user behavior and context.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers live insights into user sessions to prevent unauthorized access.
Detailed Auditing and Reporting: Helps meet compliance standards with comprehensive data reports.

Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Safeguards against unauthorized access through advanced access controls.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT operations by reducing the complexity of user management.
Compliance Support: Aids organizations in meeting regulatory standards seamlessly.
Adaptability: Functions effectively across hybrid and remote environments.

UserLock's implementation proves advantageous in sectors such as healthcare and finance, where strict compliance and data security are critical. Industries demanding robust access management find UserLock valuable for its ability to function seamlessly with existing IT infrastructure and protocols.

IS Decisions

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Barclays, US Department of Justice, National Bank of Kuwait, Turkish Aerospace, New York Albany School District, Regtransfers, University of Kent, Camden City School District, Oklahoma City Public Schools, Bank of Cyprus, Detran-PE: Pernambuco State Traffic Department

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock

October 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. UserLock report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.