We performed a comparison between Microsoft Intune and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."Compliance and the policies that can be set are the most valuable features."
"I like the group policy management feature, which performs application monitoring and device enrollment."
"The solution has reduced the risk of security breaches by 30%."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The ability to push applications on devices is valuable. You do not have to manually install applications one by one. If you like to use ten different applications, you do not have to manually go and download them one by one. Intune can compile a package for you, and then you can just push them from the admin center."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"I like how Microsoft Intune lets me lock down the email profile and make it accessible only on certain devices."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"The vulnerability management feature is what I used the most. It is a good SaaS product. It is easy to use. It has a nice UI where you can see all the assets and vulnerabilities."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"The reporting is fine."
"We also like the flexibility in their licensing."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"Intune could add more Linux security features and more integration with on-prem devices. The application deployments can also be improved."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"The reporting in this solution can be improved."
"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"The IoT scan is not great."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 166 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.