Microsoft System Center and New Relic compete in the software automation and monitoring category. While both have strong features, New Relic stands out for its application and server monitoring capabilities, crucial for DevOps environments.
Features: Microsoft System Center provides seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating automation, configuration, and monitoring. Its user-friendly interface in Windows environments and extensive API integrations ease administrative tasks. New Relic excels in rapid deployment with dynamic dashboards, offering real-time insights and detailed transaction traces. Its comprehensive monitoring suits diverse environments with third-party integrations, providing a versatile toolset for organizational needs.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center struggles with non-Microsoft integrations, resource-heavy installations, and limited cloud monitoring. User feedback highlights the inflexibility of reports and configuration challenges with third-party hypervisors. New Relic faces issues with data privacy and has room to enhance its alert systems, dashboard features, and integration support. Pricing clarity and scalability options are additional concerns for expanding enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center, mainly deployed on-premises, can be complex to implement and sometimes needs considerable technical support, with users desiring more responsive service. New Relic's public cloud deployment simplifies the setup process. Although users appreciate its straightforward installation, there's a call for improved technical support engagement and service responsiveness compared to traditional models.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center's annual licensing is expensive, with additional support contract costs. Users find the price moderate but recognize significant ROI through integration with other Microsoft tools, achieving time savings and automation. New Relic features a complex pricing model based on data ingestion, which may be cumbersome for large-scale use. Despite its high cost, it offers substantial value in application monitoring, yet pricing adjustments could improve accessibility for smaller businesses.
Issues that could be solved quickly sometimes take longer because they go around in circles.
Email alert customization is limited; it cannot be tailored much, which makes the system more rigid than optimal.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is a powerful tool for optimizing web pages, tracking user behavior, and monitoring application performance. It helps detect anomalies, generate metrics, and create dashboards for synthetics monitoring, container workloads, stress tests, and more.
New Relic provides organizations with comprehensive insights into APIs, infrastructure, and scalability. It supports mobile and web applications with features like java tracking, health maps, customizable dashboards, and drill-downs. Users benefit from its easy initial setup, accurate alerts, UI monitoring, error tracking, and traceability. New Relic supports multiple ecosystems with straightforward pricing and new feature introductions, offering end-to-end monitoring, thorough data analysis, and effective problem resolution.
What are New Relic's most important features?New Relic is leveraged in industries such as e-commerce, finance, and technology. It helps monitor web traffic, evaluate load balancing, and ensure applications meet performance standards. Companies use it for stress tests, container-based workloads, API monitoring, and infrastructure management. Its integration capabilities are valuable for maintaining performance and scalability across diverse ecosystems, aiding in thorough data analysis and problem resolution.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.