Morphisec vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Morphisec and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Morphisec is ranked #56, while Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.5. Morphisec holds a 0.4% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Morphisec users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Morphisec

Read 21 Morphisec reviews

1,161 Views
665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

4,570 Views
3,544 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Morphisec

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Morphisec and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are both endpoint security solutions. Trellix ENS appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Morphisec users highlight its lightweight design, effectiveness in preventing advanced threats, and affordability. Trellix ENS users commend its extensive feature list, advanced malware protection, and email security. Trellix ENS offers more features, making it a more versatile solution.

Room for Improvement: Morphisec users suggest enhancements in reporting, analytics capabilities, and integration. Trellix ENS users recommend improvements in integration capabilities, performance optimization, and user interface. Both products have room for improvement, but the focus areas differ.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Morphisec is praised for its quick deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS users report a steeper learning curve during deployment but appreciate the detailed documentation and support. Morphisec is easier to deploy, while Trellix ENS provides more comprehensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Morphisec is favored for its lower setup costs and faster ROI. Trellix ENS, while more expensive initially, is seen as providing significant long-term value through its extensive features. Users feel Trellix ENS justifies its price with better ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Morphisec

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

56th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

59th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (58th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (33rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (36th), Threat Deception Platforms (14th)

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

27th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Morphisec is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Islam Shaikh

Senior Manager - IT at IndiGrid Limited

Lightweight, detects everything quickly, and takes corrective action

We sometimes have to depend on the support team to know what action we should take. If the solution for an alert can be built into the report that we are getting, it will save time, and the interaction with support would be less. At times, corrective action is required, but at times, we don't need to take any action. It would be good if we get to know in the report that a particular infection doesn't require any action. It will save us time and effort. Other than that, nothing else is required. They have taken care of everything. We are getting alerts, and we can have multiple admins. We get a good model with this view.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Morphisec provides full visibility into security events from Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard. Defender and Morphisec are integrated. It's important because it lowers the total cost of maintenance on the engineer's time, more or less. So the administrative time is dramatically reduced in maintaining the product. This saves an engineer around four to five hours a week."

"Since using Morphisec we have seen a downturn in attacks because Morphisec protects us versus Defenders and whatnot that are signature-based. I know we have not had any issues with ransomware or other zero-day attacks that we've seen with machines that, all of a sudden, have become before we instituted the product. Now the machine had to be re-imaged and there was a loss of data because something was on the machine. You couldn't really determine what was on the machine because nothing was picking it up. The products we were using weren't picking it up."

"Morphisec also provides full visibility into security events for Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard... in the single pane of glass provided by Morphisec, it's all right there at your fingertips: easy to access and easy to understand. And if you choose to go down further to know everything from the process to the hash behind it, you can."

"It also provides full visibility into security events from Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard. We've always had that capability with Morphisec. The more recent version appears to do that even a little bit more natively and it's given us visibility that we didn't have otherwise."

"Morphisec stops attacks without needing to know what type of threat it is, just that it is foreign. It is based on injections, so it would know when a software launches. If a software launches and something else also launches, then it would count that as anomalous and block it. Because the software looks at the code, and if it executes something else that is not related, then Morphisec would block it. That is how it works."

"Morphisec is a straightforward solution that is efficient and very stable."

"The biggest feature is that it hides everything from your operating system that's running in-memory from anything to try to run against it. That's the most unique thing that's on the market. There's nothing else out there that's quite like that. That's a big selling point and why we went with it. It does exactly what the design does. If you can't find it, you can't execute against it."

"Morphisec makes it very easy for IT teams of any size to prevent breaches of critical systems because of the design of their tool. When we evaluated Morphisec, the CIO and I sat and listened. What attracted us to them is the fact that it stops activity at the point of detection. That saves a lot of time because now we are not investigating and trying to trace down what to turn off. We have already prevented it, which makes it very much safer and more secure."

More Morphisec pros

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."

"The product can be installed in almost any environment"

"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"It would be useful for them if they had some kind of network discovery. That kind of functionality I think would give IT administrators a little bit more confidence that they have 100 percent coverage, and it gives them something to audit against. Network discovery would be one area I would definitely suggest that they put some effort into."

"Those are some of the features that I was looking for on my on-prem platform that they've already instituted in the cloud and that I'm sure will be instituting on their on-prem platform as well. Having to have an on-prem server required a lot of administration. Being able to push that to the cloud and have it managed up there for us is a real nice addition."

"Morphisec is a venture startup. They are still early in their growth stage. They need to get mature on their customer support and on how they interface with system tools. For example, they need to get multifactor in place and an API for the major multi-factor systems, e.g., Okta, Duo, Ping, and Microsoft. They don't have them built in yet. They are working on them. It is just not there yet. Also, their stability, customer support, and processes need improvement, which is just part of maturity."

"If anything, tech support might be their weakest link. The process of getting someone involved sometimes takes a little time. It seems to me that they should have all the data they need to let me know whether an alert is legitimate or not, but they tend to need a lot of information from me to get to the bottom of something. It usually takes a little longer than I would expect."

"We wanted to have multi-tenants in their cloud platform, so every entity can look into their own systems and not see other systems in other entities. I have a beta version on that now. I would like them to incorporate that in the cloud solution."

"The only area that really needs improvement is the reporting functionality. Gathering the detailed information that is in the system for an executive, or for me as a director, could be better. Some of the interface and reporting aspects are a little bit dated. They're working on it."

"It might be a bit much to ask, but we are now beginning to use Morphisec Scout, which provides vulnerability information. At this time, it's recognizing vulnerabilities and reporting them to us, but it's not necessarily resolving them. There's still a separate manual process to resolve those vulnerabilities, primarily through upgrades. We have to do that outside of Morphisec. If Morphisec could somehow have that capability built into it, that would be very effective."

"Sometimes it generates false positive alerts. They need to continue working on that. They have provided solutions for it and have fixed issues with updated versions. The service is quite good but they need to work on it more so that there are no false positive alerts."

More Morphisec cons

"We'd like better UI on the management screen."

"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."

"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."

"They could provide better integration capabilities for the product with other services."

"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."

"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."

"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."

"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing is tied into our contract. Because we have a long-term contract, our pricing is a little bit lower. It is per year, so we don't get charged per endpoint, but we do have a cap. Our cap is 80 endpoints. If we were to go over 80, when we renewed our contract, which is not until three years are over. Then, they would reevaluate, and say, "Well, you have more than 80 devices active right now. This is going to be the price change." They know that we are installing and replacing computers, so the numbers will be all over the place depending on whether you archive or don't archive, which is the reason why we just have to keep up on that stuff."

"Price-wise, it's on the higher side. A traditional antivirus solution is cheaper, but in terms of security and manageability, its ROI is better than a traditional antivirus. I would recommend it to anybody evaluating or considering an antivirus solution. If your system gets compromised, the cost of ransom would be a lot more. This way, it saves a lot of cost."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"It is an annual subscription basis per device. For the devices that we have in scope right now, it is about $25,000 a year."

"Licenses are per endpoint, and that's true for the cloud version as well. The only difference is that there is a little extra charge for the cloud version."

"The pricing is definitely fair for what it does."

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

"It is a little bit more expensive than other security products that we use, but it does provide us good protection. So, it is a trade-off."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 34% of the time

Halcyon vs Morphisec

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Morphisec

Compared 12% of the time

Hyver vs Morphisec

Compared 7% of the time

Virsec Security Platform vs Morphisec

Compared 7% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

March 2025

Download Morphisec product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

Morphisec integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft Defender, offering signatureless protection against zero-day threats and ransomware. It enhances existing endpoint solutions with minimal maintenance through its set-and-forget deployment, providing heightened security and reduced false positives.

Morphisec strengthens defense strategies by merging memory morphing and signatureless protection to effectively block zero-day attacks and ransomware. It operates efficiently within existing infrastructure, reducing system impact and maintenance needs. Users find its full visibility dashboard invaluable. Despite its strengths, cloud deployment and reporting features can be improved. Stability, alerts, and integration with other systems pose challenges for users, impacting usability and support quality.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft Defender for comprehensive dashboard visibility
Memory Morphing: Hides processes to reduce attack surfaces
Signatureless Protection: Prevents threats without impacting performance
Automatic Threat Blocking: Uses inbuilt intelligence to detect risks
Set-and-Forget Deployment: Simplifies management and reduces maintenance

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Quick Deployment: Fast setup without disrupting operations
Enhanced Protection: Provides an additional defense layer against advanced threats
Cost-Effectiveness: Works with existing licenses, minimizing extra investments
Improved Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with current antivirus systems
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently without overloading resources

In security-focused industries, Morphisec is crucial for protecting workstations and servers against sophisticated attacks like ransomware. Its signatureless technology offers early threat detection, while compatibility with existing systems ensures seamless integration, providing advanced protection without additional licensing costs.

Morphisec

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Free Report: Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.