Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Stonebranch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers responsive support with varying service levels, but documentation and response times need improvement.
Sentiment score
8.1
Stonebranch customer service is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and quick resolutions, though some seek improved critical incident response times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform requires improved error handling, scalability, support, integration options, and enhanced performance, security, and pricing flexibility.
Sentiment score
6.8
Stonebranch needs enhanced UI, task management, mainframe integration, and better training, with improved features and analytics in Universal Automation Center.
MuleSoft is considered expensive, so pricing is a major concern.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is highly scalable and suited for enterprises, but requires investment for optimal performance and integration.
Sentiment score
8.5
Stonebranch scales effectively, efficiently managing large tasks and environments, though there's room for improvement in node expansion and controller capabilities.
MuleSoft provides the ability to scale, yet it is costly to do so.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's high pricing challenges small businesses despite benefits, though a pay-as-you-go model may improve accessibility.
No sentiment score available
Stonebranch offers cost-effective pricing, unlimited features, and included support, making it cheaper than competitors like Automic and Control-M.
MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is stable and reliable, but connector issues and external factors may affect its consistency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Stonebranch is praised for stability, quick issue resolution, and high-availability features, with minimal disruptions even during maintenance.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management, offering easy integration, visual design, scalability, and seamless microservices support.
Sentiment score
7.8
Stonebranch provides platform-neutral task automation, robust workflow management, and customizable scheduling, enhancing visibility and efficiency in diverse environments.
The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API.
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Workload Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)
Stonebranch
Ranking in Workload Automation
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stonebranch is 5.3%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Corydon Hinton - PeerSpot reviewer
Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results
Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.
Earl Diem - PeerSpot reviewer
Allowed us to develop workflows without having to train and develop very specialized skillsets
The Universal Agent is the most valuable feature. Being agent-based and being able to go across multiple technology stacks, which is what our workflows do, Stonebranch gives us the ability to bridge those disparate technologies. It enables us to remove the dependency-gap with the agent so we know the status of the workflow at each step. Workflow development in Stonebranch is straightforward. There is something of a learning curve, but it's not very steep. Being able to develop workflows without having to train and develop some very specialized skillsets to use the tool is very useful. Stonebranch absolutely helped enable digital transformation in our company and it still is. In our automation efforts, we're pushing everything to Informatica and, as we move those ETLs, we're automating the entire workflows. In phase-one and phase-two, there were 244 jobs migrated in from other ETL platforms to Informatica, and we've automated all of those. We have almost 200 jobs remaining. We're going to have something approaching 450 workflows in Stonebranch when we're done.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
15%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
What do you like most about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
We like that it has GUI and is not just a command line.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
The pricing is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. The pricing is similar to AutoSys. It's lower than Redwood, which was on the higher side in terms of pricing.
What needs improvement with Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
It can be hard to manage the task monitor. We are still working with the vendor, and we are trying to make the changes as per our requirements. We are asking them to build some new solutions so the...
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Stonebranch and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.