Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Talend Open Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)
Talend Open Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

AT
Sep 7, 2023
Very scalable and customizable
In terms of improvement, the deployment time could be a little shorter. Other platforms such as Boomi or SnapLogic are much faster to develop. Anypoint Platform has added the option to generate flow online, but it still needs some improvement. It should give better control over account management. Mule Anypoint Platform includes an API Manager and it has a strong ESB. However, the API management capabilities of Apigee offer more advanced and dynamic features for managing APIs. Additionally, Mule should work on reducing the complexity of their platform and providing more flexibility for users. Those who are not well-versed in Java will have a hard time with the development of Anypoint Platform. While it offers connectors, the connectors have limitations. It should offer features that can be customized by users, allowing for greater adaptability, and offer customization options within these connectors, to make it easier for users to tailor them to specific needs. Platforms such as Dell Omni and SnapLogic already provide solutions for these problems and allow users to easily plug them in and start working.
AaronRumley - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 24, 2023
Solid tech support and easy to use
Our primary use case is for data migration and validations This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to query from different sources and transform and send it to APIs through API calls. The most valuable feature for me when it comes to this solution is that it's easy to use. I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."
"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"The tool helps with order management and automates the enterprise's orchestration, invoice creation, product maintenance, and product life cycle. The API manager feature helps us configure, secure, and call APIs."
"Talend Open Studio's installation process is easy. One just needs to install Java before installing the product"
"This solution has improved our overall time to value for data ingestion."
"A very user friendly solution."
"You can use Talend as a stand-alone application without customization to collect data and generate reports over dashboards. It's got great functionality."
"Talend lets you do everything — mapping, workflow, and orchestration — in a single place."
"The API integration and big data approach are very good because of how you extract data from JSP files or big data web repositories like MongoDB."
"The product is easy to install and configure. It is one of the best tools for data integration."
"The most valuable features are the ETL tools."
 

Cons

"The product is expensive."
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The solution needs more integrations."
"The technical support and documentation need a lot of work to come up to standard."
"In the next release, Open Studio should include cloud storage as an input."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would say that writing to JSON is kind of a pain. It reads from a JSON file pretty well, but writing to a JSON file is not so great because its components are not good."
"I rate Talend Open Studio's stability an eight out of ten. Talend has some problems sometimes."
"Talend should improve the log and error handling to better track the errors you find during development. Sometimes it's challenging to see what's causing an issue, and tracking that on Talend is complicated."
"Talent consumes a lot of resources on my PC."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."
"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."
"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."
"I am using the open-source version of the solution, so there are no extra costs for any feature."
"Talend is free and you can download it."
"Talend Open Studio costs about 11,000 a year."
"Pricing and licensing are fairly straightforward. It is reasonably priced and managed."
"The solution will be more expensive if you have a low data volume and a large number of developers."
"There are many versions available and one is open-sourced which is free."
"The paid version of this solution has a very high price, but even with the limitations, the Community version works fine."
"The cost for one year for the ETL tools, not for the big data, is 6K per year. It is a good price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What do you like most about Talend Open Studio?
It is easy to use and covers most of the functions needed. We can use the code without any extra effort. The open source is very good. They have the same commercials with additional connectors. The...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Talend Open Studio?
The solution's pricing depends on the case. In the past, the pricing was based on the number of users and not on the data volumes or the number of CPUs, like other products. From this perspective, ...
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
Open Studio
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Almerys, BF&M, Findus
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Talend Open Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.