N-able EDR vs Trellix Active Response comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #50 with an average rating of 8.0. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

710 Views
548 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Active Response

Read 4 Trellix Active Response reviews

365 Views
252 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Active Response

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Active Response and N-able EDR are two leading products in endpoint detection and response. N-able EDR stands out with superior features that justify its higher cost according to user reviews.

Features: Trellix Active Response offers real-time threat detection, automated incident response, and strong support. N-able EDR provides comprehensive threat intelligence, advanced machine learning capabilities, and deeper analytical insights.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Active Response could improve integration capabilities, reduce false positives, and enhance its user interface. N-able EDR could enhance reporting features, reduce complexity in configuration, and offer more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Active Response receives favorable feedback for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. N-able EDR is noted for its more complex setup but offers excellent support and detailed guidance, requiring a steeper learning curve yet providing robust assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Active Response is known for its cost-effectiveness and tangible ROI through reduced incident response time. N-able EDR, though more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment by users who report significant improvements in threat management and operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Active Response

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

50th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Ezzard De Lange

Senior Manager Operational Technology and Cyber Security at Eskom Ltd

Operational efficiencies increase with immediate threat alerts for endpoints

We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature. They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The solution is scalable."

"The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature."

"It's a little lighter compared to the older version, which was mostly signature-based."

"The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature."

"We are hoping to automate detection and response and take advantage of user behavior analytics, given that we are working from home. About half of our workers are still remote, so Active Response gives us that visibility and lets us automate a number of those events."

Cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems."

"There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't."

"While the product is good, we are currently facing support issues."

"I also expected Active Response 's user interface to be much more analytical."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"Our costs were somewhere around $600K in Trinidad dollars, which might be about $100K US. We have the ETP plus the EDR. Our recent renewal was 1800 licenses as opposed to the full amount. Our transaction cost was about $600K Trinidad dollars, which is somewhere around $90-100K US."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Non Profit

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Active Response?

Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective. I rate the pricing between a six and an eight. It is justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Active Response?

The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems. We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems simila...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Active Response?

We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 40% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 29% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 60% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 40% of the time

More Trellix Active Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Trellix Active Response product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Active Response

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.

Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.

Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

March 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.