Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

N-able EDR vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response comparison

N-able and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0, while WatchGuard is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
N-able EDR
Read 3 N-able EDR reviews
  • 710 Views
  • 548 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WatchGuard Threat Detection...
Read 13 WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response reviews
  • 995 Views
  • 746 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response and N-able EDR are both powerful cybersecurity solutions competing in the cybersecurity arena. Based on user reviews, N-able EDR has the upper hand due to its robust features and high ROI.

Features: WatchGuard users appreciate the automated threat detection, seamless integration, and advanced reporting capabilities. N-able EDR users highlight its real-time threat intelligence, detailed analytics dashboard, and extensive endpoint protection features.

Room for Improvement: WatchGuard could improve its incident response time, add more customizable options, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. N-able EDR needs smoother updates, better offline protection, and more comprehensive user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard is commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. N-able EDR enjoys positive feedback for ease of deployment but has mixed reviews regarding promptness and effectiveness of customer service.

Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard is considered budget-friendly with satisfactory ROI. N-able EDR is perceived as higher-priced but justified by the significant return on investment due to its extensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
55th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WatchGuard Threat Detection...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw - PeerSpot reviewer
N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.
N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.
Read full review
Jose Fos - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution provides automated responses and helps protect our systems
We use the solution to protect our systems. We also use it for real-time detection The tool provides automated responses. It has a lot of features. The interface is not the best. I do not like it. The reports must also be improved. I am currently using the solution. I have contacted the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."
"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."
"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."
"The tool provides automated responses."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The basic functionality is fantastic. It has been performing well. I generated a report on one machine, using that as the deployment machine. When scanning the network, it discovered machines on the network and deployed the same endpoint protection from that one machine I have on my network."
"When you download the executable file from the internet, it automatically sandboxes to make sure it's not doing anything incorrectly."
"The most valuable features include the ability to raise alarms when there are issues, easier configuration compared to other vendors, centralized update management, and keeping the product updated efficiently."
"The analytics are important because if there is an abnormality then it provides that information to us."
"WatchGuard is very user-friendly. It provides us with all of the security services we need."
"The protection that it provides from ransomware is valuable. The awareness that it has is also valuable. It didn't have a central console earlier, but now it has a central console, which is pretty good."
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."
"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."
"I'd like a few extra features, especially around threat severity assessment."
"The pricing of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response could be improved."
"This product needs to be fully integrated with the firewall. Currently, it only sends logs to the cloud and asks the firewall to correlate them."
"WatchGuard should offer more visibility into user activity. For example, we should have more details when WatchGuard denies a user access to a port."
"The website must provide more information on the product."
"The solution is a bit confusing and there are unusual complications with setup."
"When it comes to live-monitoring, the user-interface could be improved to make things easier."
"The ease of detecting where an issue is should be improved."
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."
"The solution is a bit more expensive than other options."
"The solution is cheap."
"The price is very good."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The price is comparable."
"There is a license required to use the solution and we pay annually. The price could be reduced because it is a bit expensive."
"The price of WatchGuard is very good."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Non Profit
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Retailer
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?
I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?
I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?
The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.
See all answers
What do you like most about WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
The tool provides automated responses.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
The pricing of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response could be improved. It's not the cheapest option available. That said, it often meets our needs effectively. There are areas for improvement i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is used to monitor traffic and give alarms to the administration if something goes wrong. It reacts when services protected by it are attacked and sends not...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR
Compared 40% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR
Compared 29% of the time
ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR
Compared 13% of the time
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR
Compared 10% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR
Compared 9% of the time
More N-able EDR Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 43% of the time
Darktrace vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Darktrace vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Intercept X Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Intercept X Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 7% of the time
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
N-able EDR reportDownload N-able EDR product report
Buyer's Guide
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
March 2025
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response reportDownload WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
WatchGuard TDR
 

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?
  • Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
  • Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
  • Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
  • Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
  • Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
  • Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
  • High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.
What benefits or ROI should be considered?
  • Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
  • Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
  • Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
  • Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Hackers are designing malware to be more sophisticated than ever. Through packing, encryption, and polymorphism, cyber criminals are able to disguise their attacks to avoid detection. Zero day threats and advanced malware easily slip by antivirus solutions that are simply too slow to respond to the constant stream of emerging threats. Organizations of all sizes need a solution that leverages a holistic approach to security from the network to the endpoint. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response (TDR) is a powerful collection of advanced malware defense tools that correlate threat indicators from Firebox appliances and Host Sensors to stop known, unknown and evasive malware threats.

WatchGuard
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Goodwill New York / New Jersey, F4 IT, Café Comunicação Integrada
Buyer's Guide
N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
March 2025
Free Report: N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.