Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo

Top 10 WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Alternatives

Vendor: WatchGuard
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence integration, real-time monitoring, and automated response capabilities, ensuring comprehensive security coverage and rapid incident mitigation, thus providing unmatched protection for businesses.

WatchGuard Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WatchGuard, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat analytics and visibility for remote manual analysis. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response provides ease of use and affordability, making it ideal for smaller environments with automated alerts and network filtering.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon involves a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced cybersecurity, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing ease of integration and use.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon involves a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced cybersecurity, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing ease of integration and use.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard provides real-time threat detection and a user-friendly dashboard, making it easy to deploy with reliable customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers advanced threat analytics and superior integration with other Microsoft products, delivering extensive features and strong support channels, despite a steeper learning curve.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response features a straightforward, lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint demands a higher initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response features a straightforward, lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint demands a higher initial investment.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in automated threat response and real-time protection, making it appealing for straightforward deployment and customer support. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers advanced detection algorithms and integration capabilities, appealing to those willing to invest in sophisticated feature sets.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, highlighting a crucial difference for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, highlighting a crucial difference for budget-conscious users.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is known for its autonomous threat detection, AI-driven analytics, and real-time forensics. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers advanced threat correlation, intuitive detection, and comprehensive threat intelligence. SentinelOne excels in ease of deployment, while WatchGuard is praised for pricing and ROI.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more economical setup cost, reflecting their differing target markets and feature sets.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more economical setup cost, reflecting their differing target markets and feature sets.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard provides robust threat detection with real-time monitoring and automated responses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR excels in advanced threat protection, integrating deeply with Microsoft products. WatchGuard offers easier deployment and competitive pricing. Microsoft Defender XDR demands expertise but offers extensive features and long-term ROI.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers low setup costs while Microsoft Defender XDR has higher initial expenses. WatchGuard provides affordability, but Microsoft's costlier setup might indicate a more comprehensive deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers low setup costs while Microsoft Defender XDR has higher initial expenses. WatchGuard provides affordability, but Microsoft's costlier setup might indicate a more comprehensive deployment.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard offers ease of deployment and customer service, while Intercept X Endpoint provides comprehensive features despite higher costs. In comparison, WatchGuard excels in real-time threat intelligence, and Intercept X Endpoint delivers advanced threat detection. WatchGuard is cost-effective, whereas Intercept X Endpoint justifies its higher price.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is known for a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is known for a more budget-friendly setup.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers strong real-time threat intelligence and automated responses, excelling in prevention and remediation, with competitive pricing and seamless integration. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response provides advanced detection and in-depth analytics with detailed reporting, appealing to those needing sophisticated feature sets.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for its moderate setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response typically boasts a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for its moderate setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response typically boasts a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for these two solutions.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Download Trend Vision One vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers real-time threat intelligence and endpoint visibility, valued for detailed analytics but needs enhanced support and faster response times. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response shines in advanced threat detection and automated response features, praised for integration capabilities and cost-effectiveness.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint features a high initial setup cost, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more affordable setup cost. VMware is known for extensive configuration requirements, contrasting with WatchGuard's simpler setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint features a high initial setup cost, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more affordable setup cost. VMware is known for extensive configuration requirements, contrasting with WatchGuard's simpler setup process.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.8 out of 5
WatchGuard offers competitive pricing and reliable support with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, Huntress provides advanced threat detection and continuous monitoring, favoring those seeking deeper protection. WatchGuard suits scalable, cost-effective solutions, while Huntress appeals to businesses valuing proactive threat management despite higher costs.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response involves a moderate setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a simpler setup process. Huntress's ease of setup contrasts with WatchGuard's more complex requirements, highlighting significant differences in user onboarding experiences.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response involves a moderate setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a simpler setup process. Huntress's ease of setup contrasts with WatchGuard's more complex requirements, highlighting significant differences in user onboarding experiences.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard offers robust threat detection, real-time response, and a competitive setup cost with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Trellix ENS provides a comprehensive feature set with advanced threat prevention, though it requires complex deployment and faces performance issues but delivers higher ROI due to its extensive capabilities.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a low initial setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) may involve higher initial setup expenses. WatchGuard offers a more budget-friendly option compared to Trellix ENS.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a low initial setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) may involve higher initial setup expenses. WatchGuard offers a more budget-friendly option compared to Trellix ENS.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is renowned for real-time threat intelligence and endpoint visibility. In comparison, Cynet offers comprehensive threat detection and automated response. WatchGuard excels in deployment and integration, while Cynet attracts customers with better pricing and customer support. Both serve different business needs effectively.
Download Cynet vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Cynet's setup cost is low while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet's setup cost is low while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response has a higher initial setup cost.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in user satisfaction with support and pricing. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is favored for its advanced feature set. Bitdefender is chosen for ease of deployment and competitive pricing, while WatchGuard is selected for extensive network visibility and long-term value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's setup cost is lower than WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. WatchGuard, however, offers a more comprehensive setup package, potentially justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's setup cost is lower than WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. WatchGuard, however, offers a more comprehensive setup package, potentially justifying its higher cost.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard offers cost-effective pricing and intuitive setup, ideal for straightforward deployment and budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Kaspersky's advanced feature set and comprehensive threat intelligence are notable advantages. Kaspersky requires higher setup costs but provides robust security features and automated responses, justifying the investment.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response features a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is known for higher initial setup expenses. WatchGuard may benefit cost-sensitive setups, whereas Kaspersky offers extensive capabilities...
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response features a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is known for higher initial setup expenses. WatchGuard may benefit cost-sensitive setups, whereas Kaspersky offers extensive capabilities...
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in pricing and customer support. In comparison, WatchGuard provides advanced threat analytics and real-time response. ESET Inspect is appreciated for straightforward deployment while WatchGuard offers premium features. ESET Inspect enhances cost-effectiveness, whereas WatchGuard justifies higher costs with advanced capabilities.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response. WatchGuard's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response. WatchGuard's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its comprehensive features.
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response integrates well with existing security infrastructure and features intuitive alerts. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced analytics, an extensive threat database, and incident response functionalities. WatchGuard's straightforward deployment contrasts with Symantec's detailed documentation and responsive customer service.
Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment for setup and integration.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment for setup and integration.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)