NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs Omada Access Points comparison

Netgear and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Netgear is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6. Netgear holds a 1.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Netgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Read 12 NETGEAR Insight Access Points reviews

1,295 Views
1,295 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,354 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and NETGEAR Insight Access Points compete in the wireless networking category. NETGEAR Insight appears to have the edge due to its comprehensive feature set and advanced capabilities.

Features: Omada Access Points offer efficient cloud management, seamless network integration, and ease of scaling. NETGEAR Insight Access Points provide multi-gigabit ethernet, extensive security options, and advanced network monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could benefit from enhanced security options, more advanced management features, and improved throughput. NETGEAR Insight could improve customer support responsiveness, simplify its advanced features for users without technical expertise, and reduce the complexity of its deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETGEAR Insight Access Points have an easy setup with app management, ensuring a smooth installation. Omada Access Points excel with a strong customer support team, providing quick issue resolution and higher customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points present an attractive initial cost and long-term value with stable performance and low operating costs, perfect for budget-conscious buyers. NETGEAR Insight Access Points, while more expensive upfront, deliver strong ROI for enterprises needing advanced features and higher data throughput.

To learn more, read our detailed NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of NETGEAR Insight Access Points is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Omada Access Points	4.1%
NETGEAR Insight Access Points	1.3%
Other	94.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Calvin Ong

Business Manager at KAIRA Technologies pte ltd

Reasonably priced product with a straightforward deployment process

I never thought about what could be made better in the product since my company is a customer-centric organization where we provide Aruba or NETGEAR, depending on the demands and needs of our customers. The product's UI needs to be simplified and made more straightforward. It would be great if it was possible to send notifications regarding some errors related to the product that can be sent from our company to our clients through the organization's post-sales team.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"[Being] able to configure the WiFi devices and to see utilization remotely, or from the cloud."

"From the WiFi aspect, it's very intuitive and easy to use. The solution enables me to manage my entire WiFi from anywhere in the world..."

"We use NETGEAR's Insight management solution to do off-property controls. It is user-friendly and provides network management, monitoring, and service deployment across multiple remote and local sites. That means I don't have to be physically at a location to do things if I want to make any changes to the network. It saves time and money."

"I now have the ability to remote access my network. That works extremely well. I can access it from any place. I don't need to be physically at the device. This saves me on time and travel."

"The metrics demonstrate that NETGEAR really does a good job of balancing the load between the various access points on the networks and this results in an elimination of downtime."

"I am all about simplicity. With the Insight management solution, I don’t need an additional cloud controller, appliance, network manager, or PC/server to configure and manage my access points. You have to look at cost, and everything has a cost. There is a cost to using Insight. But if the cost is reasonable, I don't want another layer. The ability to deploy a network and then have that software built-in, without having to go to a third-party, is big. Also, the less pieces that I have to call in on, the better. So, when I'm calling NETGEAR, it's not like I'm using some third-party piece of software to manage their product. It doesn't add that layer of complexity, which is key."

"The product's deployment is straightforward."

"The meshing capabilities are the most valuable feature. When I am going in-between buildings, my phone doesn't have to pick up different WiFi. They are all the same. Even in-between the buildings, I stay connected."

More NETGEAR Insight Access Points pros

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"While the data throughput does provide us with full insight into data being used, we find that it's not very accurate."

"My major problem is right now, the area which I need to cover is around 7,000 to 10,000 square feet...I would like NETGEAR Insight Access Points to extend the area coverage they provide."

"Software-wise, they need to provide the ability to kick users out. If multiple users are abusing the system or the network, I should be able to block them for a time and, when I need to unblock them, I should be able to do so by using their MAC ID. That feature might already be there and I just don't know about it."

"A con is the backend system which is very, very slow."

"The product's UI needs to be simplified and made more straightforward."

"I have some frustrations with the ease of use. It tends to be sluggish. The graphical interface is pretty, but not useful. They have this tree that shows connected devices, which makes no sense whatsoever because the labeling field of the tree truncates all the items to the point that it's almost useless. You can't even tell what it is. I would prefer a spreadsheet list of the gear as opposed to a graphical representation."

"There is always room for improvement."

"Ubiquiti is a very good company. NETGEAR should look at that model and expand on its remote capabilities. Ubiquiti seems to have a better product."

More NETGEAR Insight Access Points cons

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"The technical support could be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For what you get, the price of Insight access points is very reasonable."

"I can source the stuff pretty quickly wherever I go through the distributor. There is pricing available at NETGEAR if you can spend between $2,000 and $5,000 on a solution. So, there is special pricing that they can help with. The vendor's reps are very responsive. They have a good channel system."

"I think that the price of the product is reasonable."

"It wasn't much more than 100 dollars a year. For the devices that we have, the pricing was pretty fair."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Their pricing is perfect for smaller businesses who are money and budget conscious. There are a lot of other solutions out there that are two to three times more expensive."

"We have some basic models they give without a license."

"My company does not need to pay anything related to the solution's licensing costs."

More NETGEAR Insight Access Points pricing and cost advice

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NETGEAR Insight Access Points?

The product's deployment is straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETGEAR Insight Access Points?

We have some basic models they give without a license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NETGEAR Insight Access Points?

The pricing and standard connectivity can be further improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubiquiti WLAN vs NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Compared 21% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs NETGEAR Insight Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More NETGEAR Insight Access Points Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Omada Access Points

Compared 5% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETGEAR Insight Access Points

October 2025

Download NETGEAR Insight Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

October 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

At NETGEAR, we turn ideas into innovative networking products that connect people, power businesses, and advance the way we live. Easy to use. Powerful. Smart. And designed just for you.

Netgear

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.