Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NEVIS nevisIDM vs Okta Customer Identity comparison

AdNovum and Okta are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. AdNovum is ranked #20, while Okta is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. AdNovum holds a 0.9% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Okta’s 9.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution.
NEVIS nevisIDM
  • 67 Views
  • 54 Comparison Views
Okta Customer Identity
Read 14 Okta Customer Identity reviews
  • 903 Views
  • 699 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between NEVIS nevisIDM and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,129 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

NEVIS nevisIDM
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
20th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Okta Customer Identity
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of NEVIS nevisIDM is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Customer Identity is 9.0%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use NEVIS nevisIDM?
Share your opinion
Upendar G - PeerSpot reviewer
Leverage reliable server management for seamless identity operations
There is room for Okta Customer Identity to improve by increasing the reliability for the server end, creating more directories, and focusing on internal users rather than external or contract-based ones. Additionally, extending idle session times from ten milliseconds to at least forty-five seconds would be beneficial. It is also suggested that patches be applied annually rather than quarterly.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Okta Customer Identity?
Okta has more when it comes to the policy level. It has distinctive features where you can do a mix and combination to have users access applications for various business cases.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Customer Identity?
The pricing for Okta Customer Identity is very economical. It is much cheaper compared to Oracle Access Manager, and the company focuses on internal training to mitigate additional certification co...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Okta Customer Identity?
There is room for Okta Customer Identity to improve by increasing the reliability for the server end, creating more directories, and focusing on internal users rather than external or contract-base...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Entra External ID vs Okta Customer Identity Logo
Microsoft Entra External ID vs Okta Customer Identity
Compared 34% of the time
ForgeRock vs Okta Customer Identity Logo
ForgeRock vs Okta Customer Identity
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs Okta Customer Identity Logo
Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs Okta Customer Identity
Compared 19% of the time
Auth0 vs Okta Customer Identity Logo
Auth0 vs Okta Customer Identity
Compared 8% of the time
Transmit Security vs Okta Customer Identity Logo
Transmit Security vs Okta Customer Identity
Compared 8% of the time
More Okta Customer Identity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
December 2024
NEVIS nevisIDM reportDownload NEVIS nevisIDM product report
Buyer's Guide
Okta Customer Identity
December 2024
Okta Customer Identity reportDownload Okta Customer Identity product report
 

Also Known As

nevisIDM, AdNovum nevisIDM
No data available
 

Learn More

AdNovum
Video not available
Okta
 

Overview

The NEVIS identity management solution nevisIDM offers a flexible, customizable and centralized management of users, applications, roles and permissions.

Okta Customer Identity is an identity service that enables frictionless experience, speed-to-market, centralized management, and internet-scale security. Okta Customer Identity is developer friendly and secure with minimal custom code.

 

Sample Customers

PostFinance, Quilvest, Generali, Swisscom Extranet
FedEx, Adobe, National Geographic, Tyson, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.