Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Norton Security Premium [EOL] vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

The compared Norton Security Premium [EOL] and Symantec Endpoint Security solutions aren't in the same category. Symantec Endpoint Security is ranked #12 in EPP , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Norton Security Premium [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Symantec Endpoint Security users who would recommend it.
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 142 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 10,982 Views
  • 9,432 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Norton Security Premium [EOL] and Symantec Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, VirusTotal and others in Anti-Malware Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Anti-Malware Tools Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Anti-Malware Tools
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Norton Security Premium [EOL]
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
142
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

Shrikant Pillay - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable security solution that is easy to install
The only problem with Norton Antivirus is that it consumes a lot of resources like CPU and memory in the background. Whenever it's scanning, my laptop becomes very slow, and the worst part is you cannot do anything about it. As this product is secured by my local IT team, you cannot even kill that process, and that's what I've felt about many other antivirus solutions. I'm using McAfee for personal use, and I have the same problem.
Read full review
Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With the heightened security around phishing, identity theft, and malware, this is a good product."
"We like how it can check for issues. That includes files and web browsers."
"The dashboard is good."
"The product is called Norton 360 all-in-one. It is a full product."
"Protects me from internet vulnerability."
"Norton Security Premium is good, and it's pretty simple to install."
"The internet security was a plus, and it's pretty good."
"Flexible antivirus and antimalware software. It also provides protection against ransomware. It's flexible, easy to handle, scalable, and stable."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] pros
"The pricing is pretty good."
"The administrator's console is very good and easy to manage with it. Deploying patches, definition updates and report is simple."
"Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control."
"The initial setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The product has valuable features for insights."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution can be scaled to handle different threats."
"If there is exposure, we need to investigate the source of the attack, e.g., whether it came from the network or externally. We view the firewall logs, and if there has been exposure, then we use the Application Isolation feature. When there is an attack with on-prem, that system will go into isolation mode, removing connectivity to other internal systems. We also restrict the WLAN part to avoid that system broadcasting to other networks."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"The product is an antivirus, it should be updated automatically when needed."
"The product could always be more secure."
"Having a dashboard that shows the different functions of Norton Security Premium can convince end users that the software is more than just an antivirus solution. This product offers several features, but end users think that it's just one out of the box solution, because the different functions are not explained in detail."
"During scanning, sometimes, there is a heavy load on the workstation. This needs to be improved."
"Occasionally when you open a ticket, there's a lack of understanding that prevents the solution from being resolved directly."
"I don't like the password manager of Norton Security Premium."
"The only problem with Norton Antivirus is that it consumes a lot of resources like CPU and memory in the background. Whenever it's scanning, my laptop becomes very slow, and the worst part is you cannot do anything about it. As this product is secured by my local IT team, you cannot even kill that process, and that's what I've felt about many other antivirus solutions. I'm using McAfee for personal use, and I have the same problem."
"Security Premium's cost could be lower."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] cons
"I would like to see a hybrid version of this solution that covers both in-house and cloud-based servers."
"We had an issue with the Broadcom migration. We had some problems with product support, and the deployment is tricky because it's an on-premises technology. Deploying any on-premises security solution is hard because you have to distribute the software."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see more to do with malware, encryption technology, and controlling mobile devices."
"Every time an OS comes out, I have to upgrade the Symantec product. They don't know how to patch it. If they would produce a patch instead of uninstalling or installing over the current version and rebooting I'd be a lot happier with the product."
"As for some features I would like to see, I'd like a retrospective action feature similar to Cisco Secure Endpoint's. Some antiviruses don't allow you to re-scan a product that was in the former scan—for example, if a file was classified as proper, but then for some reason the file was changed, we need an antivirus with retrospective capability. We need EPP and EDR products in a secured environment."
"After selling this product, what we have observed is that the system gets slower, which is a major issue."
"There is no local support for Symantec products in Hong Kong."
"Since the acquisition by Broadcom, we are no longer receiving the proper support."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If they could come down in price that would be good. It's not exactly the lowest."
"As I have been a long-time customer, I was given a fair price of $49.95 per month for the first four to six months."
"The solution gives the value for the money."
"Security Premium is highly-priced."
"Security Premium costs around US$100 for three years, which is a little expensive."
"The licensing fee for this solution is not expensive."
"Pricing for this software is competitive."
"I don't pay for a license."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] pricing and cost advice
"Symantec is expensive."
"It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone."
"Regarding the licensing, it was important negotiate a long contract to get a more attractive price, including advanced support in case of crisis."
"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."
"It is the better product, even if it is a little on the higher side."
"Its price is reasonable."
"Licensing is per user. Therefore, it makes it easy to do licensing."
"The licensing costs are huge compared to what is normally included in the licensing with other products such as the Microsoft products that we're using. We're paying between $300 and $400 per seat."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 19% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 19% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 6% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Anti-Malware Tools
January 2025
Norton Security Premium [EOL] reportDownload Norton Security Premium [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
March 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

Norton Internet Security
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Overview

The more connected you are and the more your personal information is out there, the more security you need. Do you watch videos or shop on your tablet? Use your smartphone to pay bills or check your balances? Your personal information is in multiple places. Keep it private across all of them. Norton Security Premium provides one easy solution to protect your computers, smartphones and tablets, even on multiple operating systems: Windows, Mac, Android and iOS — and Windows 10. Plus, only Norton shows you if that Android app you’re about to download will impact your battery life, has potential privacy risks or contains malware, before you even install it from Google Play.

Broadcom

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Temple University
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
Anti-Malware Tools
January 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, VirusTotal and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.