Odin Virtuozzo Containers vs VMware vSphere comparison

Odin and VMware are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Odin is ranked #19, while VMware is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Odin holds a 0.2% mindshare in SVS, compared to VMware’s 17.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of VMware users are willing to recommend the solution.

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Read 2 Odin Virtuozzo Containers reviews

301 Views
257 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

VMware vSphere

Read 454 VMware vSphere reviews

29,259 Views
24,243 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

VMware vSphere

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere compete in the virtualization solutions category. VMware vSphere has the upper hand, offering advanced features that justify its higher cost, appealing to technical buyers.

Features: Odin Virtuozzo Containers provides efficient resource management, lightweight virtualization, and rapid deployment capabilities. VMware vSphere offers comprehensive management tools, high-performance computing support, and robust security options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware vSphere is known for streamlined deployment processes and strong technical support, simplifying setup for larger systems. Odin Virtuozzo Containers offers easier deployment for smaller to mid-sized operations with personalized customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Odin Virtuozzo Containers often has lower upfront costs and faster ROI in small to medium enterprises. VMware vSphere's higher setup cost is offset by extensive features and scalability, leading to long-term ROI in large-scale enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Server Virtualization Software Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

19th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware vSphere

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

454

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Odin Virtuozzo Containers is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware vSphere is 17.3%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Ramon Ruiz

Director IT at Servnet

Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible

Anyone considering this solution should not compare it to the old versions. They should be a partner with Virtuozzo and run all the certifications. Also, they need a good lab to understand the technology and how they can apply that technology conveniently. This is very commercial software. It does not have support, so you will need to be hands-on. I would rate Odin Virtuozzo a six out of 10 overall.

Read full review

Neeraj Mehra

Manager of Solutions and Support at Esconet Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Streamlines virtualization and has features like high availability and vMotion

The primary use case is for virtualization, including the implementation of vSphere, vCloud Foundation, vCloud Director, and cloud automation with vSphere My customers, particularly SMBs, mainly utilize High Availability (HA), DRS, and vMotion features. The vMotion feature is beneficial for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."

"I like the capability of logging into one system, then being able to shift over to another system within that single pane of glass."

"The most valuable features for us are DRS, VMotion, and, of course, some of the analytics that we were able to define to quantify our workloads and tell us how we are able to make our data center more efficient."

"Has many good features, and is stable and reliable."

"The emphasis isn't specifically on a particular feature, but rather on the ease of use. For instance, when building a test lab or setting up an entire environment from scratch, VMware products are notably more user-friendly compared to alternatives like Nutanix. I've had prior experience with Nutanix. From my personal perspective, I found it easier to adapt to using VMware than when I started using Dynamics. This ease of use is a strong point. It's largely about how straightforward it is to navigate through VMware's user interface. In contrast, with Nutanix, there's a need to delve into smaller configurations and navigate vendor-specific settings. VMware, on the other hand, offers a more accessible management page. This difference primarily centres around usability and the overall user-friendliness of the interface."

"The fact that you can use all the CPU and memory power that the server can provide is most valuable. In a physical server, you might end up not using all the physical resources. There are a lot of benefits, such as flexibility and mobility, in virtualizing computes."

"The most valuable feature would be the slight changes they've made to VMFork instant cloning, in which they have abstracted out the parent-child relationship in cloning, in which certain features, like HA and DRS, are now usable on that parent virtual machine. That is wildly amazing and something that wasn't available until 6.7."

"VMware vSphere is user-friendly and simple."

"I like that it's like a distributed rescheduler. You can move to and use VMotion as well. You can move the server and move the virtual machines around different physical servers. This makes it easier when it comes to redundancy."

More VMware vSphere pros

Cons

"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."

"There are certain tools the can't run in parallel and occasionally, in those instances, we have trouble migrating customers from one source to our data center."

"Given that I've been using version seven, it seems that some of the bugs I faced during that version have already been addressed in subsequent updates. Although I haven't personally tested them yet, it appears that these issues have been resolved. In version seven, there was a problem with the network interface not responding due to certain configurations not being properly filtered. However, in version eight, this requirement has been minimized, so the mentioned bug is less likely to occur. Instead of solely addressing these fixes in newer versions, it might be beneficial for them to consider applying these improvements to the older versions as well. This approach could prevent users from feeling compelled to upgrade to version eight solely to avoid encountering the issue, and instead provide updates for version seven users."

"It's an expensive solution."

"I would like to see AI in future releases."

"I would like to see support for endpoint virtualization."

"The biggest room for improvement would be just simplicity. It is very intuitive, but it needs somebody with a lot of IT background."

"Get the HTML5 client to 100% parity to replace the Flash client."

"The quality of support could be better."

More VMware vSphere cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for Odin Virtuozzo is based on consumption on demand."

"Our customers typically use permanent licenses, not subscription-based. However, there are subscript-based licenses."

"The price is high, but you get back a lot."

"We are using the tool's free version."

"Our customers have the option of paying the licensing fee when they purchase the solution or renting it from us."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"I think the cost should be reconsidered. VMware is not the cheapest solution out there, despite the fact that it may be one of the best."

"I don't like the price because it's too expensive."

"The licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

More VMware vSphere pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user234735

Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 10, 2015

Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5

I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is IOMMU?

DEEPEN DHULLA did explain well IOMMU. IOMMU has to be activated at the bios level. It exists on Intel and AMD platforms. It is used a lot inside virtualization platforms like VMware VSphere. It pr...

See all answers

Why KVM??? Help please!

We use VMware and KVM. We find that KVM is a lot simpler to use and it provides the virtualization we need for Linux and Windows. For us, VMware does not offer any advantage. Moreover, KVM is free.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Nutanix Acropolis and VMware vSphere?

We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 46% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 23% of the time

Hyper-V vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 15% of the time

More Odin Virtuozzo Containers Competitors

Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere

Compared 24% of the time

Oracle VM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 14% of the time

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere

Compared 13% of the time

RHEV vs VMware vSphere

Compared 10% of the time

KVM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 8% of the time

More VMware vSphere Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download Odin Virtuozzo Containers product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware vSphere

March 2025

Download VMware vSphere product report

Also Known As

Virtuozzo Containers

No data available

Overview

Parallels Virtuozzo Containers creates isolated containers on a single physical server and OS instance.

Odin

VMware vSphere is a versatile virtualization platform known for its ease of use, flexibility, and high availability. It supports seamless migration, optimal resource allocation, and centralized management, making it highly suitable for diverse infrastructure needs.

VMware vSphere is widely adopted for its virtualization capabilities that enhance hardware efficiency and ensure minimal downtime through features like High Availability and Distributed Resource Scheduler. Despite criticisms about high licensing costs and limited fault tolerance, it remains a preferred choice due to its stability, scalability, and robust integration options. Users appreciate its efficiency in managing virtual machines and hosting enterprise applications, although challenges with web client performance and hardware compatibility are noted. Organizations often look for better integration with cloud services and enhanced automation and scalability.

What are the core features of VMware vSphere?

vMotion: Enables seamless migration of virtual machines without downtime.
Distributed Resource Scheduler: Optimizes resource allocation across hosts.
High Availability: Minimizes downtime by automatically restarting virtual machines.
Centralized Management: Facilitates easy management of virtualized environments.
Advanced Security: Provides robust security measures and compliance features.

What benefits and ROI can businesses look for?

Reduced Operational Costs: Efficiently utilizes hardware, saving on expenses.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business demands.
Business Continuity: Ensures high availability and disaster recovery.
Integration Flexibility: Supports integration with various technologies.

VMware vSphere is implemented across sectors like healthcare, finance, and education for server virtualization, data center management, and private cloud creation. Its use in facilitating business-critical operations ensures high availability and efficient resource use, supporting both development and production environments.

VMware

Sample Customers

OzHosting.com, Triple C, ServerNest, Vastspace, Conetix

Abu Dhabi Ports Company, ACS, AIA New Zealand, Consona, Corporate Express, CS Energy, and Digiweb.

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.