Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] vs VMware vSphere comparison

Ingram Micro and Broadcom are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.
VMware vSphere
Read 459 VMware vSphere reviews
  • 23,234 Views
  • 20,678 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL and VMware vSphere are competing products in the virtualization space. VMware vSphere is often viewed as superior due to its extensive features and value.

Features: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL focuses on lightweight containerization for rapid application deployment, easy resource management, and high efficiency. VMware vSphere provides comprehensive virtualization capabilities with features like vMotion, integrated backup solutions, and advanced networking options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL has a straightforward deployment process, which is convenient for customers looking to quickly establish environments. VMware vSphere requires more setup but offers extensive support and resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL offers a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious businesses while delivering a solid ROI through resource efficiency. VMware vSphere, despite its higher initial setup cost, provides substantial ROI due to its expansive feature set and infrastructure management capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Server Virtualization Software Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Server Virtualization Software
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [...
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware vSphere
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
459
Ranking in other categories
Server Virtualization Software (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Ramon Ruiz - PeerSpot reviewer
Ramon Ruiz
Director IT at Servnet
Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible
Anyone considering this solution should not compare it to the old versions. They should be a partner with Virtuozzo and run all the certifications. Also, they need a good lab to understand the technology and how they can apply that technology conveniently. This is very commercial software. It does not have support, so you will need to be hands-on. I would rate Odin Virtuozzo a six out of 10 overall.
Read full review
IA
IbrahimAysu
IT Director at Def Industry
Has improved infrastructure monitoring and resource management but requires better support and cost efficiency
The high availability feature's resilience is not bad, but it could be better. For example, whenever you lose any hardware, you will have interruptions on the services, and it reboots again on the other hardware host which is available at the crash time. That's good, but we would prefer to have zero downtime instead of the rebooting on the other server. We would prefer to have a zero downtime always-on configuration. VMware vSphere has a built-in feature called Fault Tolerance, but it's very limited for very limited VMs or very limited core count or CPU count, so it's not so useful for all the environment because of the limitations. The Fault Tolerance (FT) feature is very limited to very little core counts or very little VM counts, so you can't run the Fault Tolerance for all the servers or all the VMs, and that's very bad. If VMware vSphere could have any kind of built-in patch management environment with a repository, offline repository option, with test, non-production, and production environment separated, this would be perfect. Management of patch management with operating systems and including third-party applications which are running on the servers would enhance the VMware vSphere environment. VMware vSphere is very expensive. The worst aspect of VMware vSphere is the price. I can't tell you the exact cost at this time because the other team members in my teams are working on it, but I remember that the prices are very high. VMware vSphere is easy to scale, but it could be better, similar to a Kubernetes environment. It should have an automatic scale-out feature when the load gets high; if it gets some scale out automatically, it would be better than this, similar to Kubernetes or OpenShift.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"We've found the High Availability and flexibility to be important."
"The most useful aspect of VMware vSphere is that I can see the machines by folders regarding activities."
"It makes managing your virtual servers easier and more centralized."
"The solution has many valuable features. Virtualization is flexible and it has simple clustering. However, the most important feature is the ability to move between VMs. The vMotion features are very good."
"vMotion radically changes the way we think about how we can operate a large infrastructure, and notably, in terms of proactive maintenance."
"We are able to patch our hosts during production hours with the ability to keep services running."
"The ease of movement of these machines is the most valuable. It is very easy to move these machines between physical hosts. The fast deployment of services is another valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the seamless HA with vMotion and being able to run vCenters in HA mode."
More VMware vSphere pros
 

Cons

"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"One area for improvement is the documentation, especially after VMware was transferred to Broadcom. Sometimes, it is difficult to find documentation for specific tools and solutions."
"VMware vSphere is perfect for the on-premise solution, but we are in the cloud era, so I think maybe VMware needs to invest more in the cloud and the microservice chain. It would be better if VMware offered more cloud solutions and continuous applications."
"Both the price and the licensing fee are expensive, especially for our clients with a smaller workload."
"Customers face challenges due to increased costs after VMware's acquisition by Broadcom."
"OS templates should be readily available, so there is no need to get an OS separately. Only the activation part should be different, which is not presently available due to the need to get the OS from a different location, then create VMs."
"I would like to see AI in future releases."
"On the older version of VMware vSphere, possibly version four, we had a feature that allowed us to backup Ziploc machines. It has not been available in the newer version such as six or seven. I have been looking for another solution to accomplish the backups but they should bring back this plugin-type tool to allow older backup capabilities."
"I would like to see better fault and performance reporting in the GUI."
More VMware vSphere cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for Odin Virtuozzo is based on consumption on demand."
"The solution’s licensing terms keep changing, which is too complex for our customers."
"You will find the cost is reasonably cheaper."
"Once you pay for the standard license, that's it unless you want another feature to be activated. That's a different thing."
"VMware is consistently expensive and their pricing arrogance is what will drive us and other customers away."
"We don't have an active subscription. We have a prepaid or permanent license."
"The licensing cost is strictly based on the number of CPUs that your hosts have."
"I don't like the price because it's too expensive."
"The price could improve for the enterprise versions."
More VMware vSphere pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user234735 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user234735
Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
May 10, 2015
Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5
I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business175
Midsize Enterprise137
Large Enterprise259
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is IOMMU?
DEEPEN DHULLA did explain well IOMMU. IOMMU has to be activated at the bios level. It exists on Intel and AMD platforms. It is used a lot inside virtualization platforms like VMware VSphere. It pr...
See all answers
Why KVM??? Help please!
We use VMware and KVM. We find that KVM is a lot simpler to use and it provides the virtualization we need for Linux and Windows. For us, VMware does not offer any advantage. Moreover, KVM is free.
See all answers
Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?
For me the biggest impact is the cost of licensing in the case of VMware despite its overall intuitiveness and ease of handling and management. However, KVM-based Open Source solutions are becoming...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Logo
Proxmox VE vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]
Compared 22% of the time
Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Logo
Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
Hyper-V vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Logo
Hyper-V vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]
Compared 14% of the time
Oracle VM vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Logo
Oracle VM vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
KVM vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Logo
KVM vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
More Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Competitors
Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere Logo
Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere
Compared 53% of the time
Oracle VM vs VMware vSphere Logo
Oracle VM vs VMware vSphere
Compared 10% of the time
Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere Logo
Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere
Compared 7% of the time
KVM vs VMware vSphere Logo
KVM vs VMware vSphere
Compared 5% of the time
Citrix XenServer vs VMware vSphere Logo
Citrix XenServer vs VMware vSphere
Compared 3% of the time
More VMware vSphere Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Server Virtualization Software
February 2026
Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] reportDownload Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
VMware vSphere
January 2026
VMware vSphere reportDownload VMware vSphere product report
 

Also Known As

Virtuozzo Containers
No data available
 

Overview

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] facilitated efficient virtualization by providing container-based solutions, optimizing resource management, and reducing overhead costs. Its capabilities included enhanced server implementations, making it suitable for professional environments.

With Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL], enterprises managed multiple isolated instances on a single server, enhancing control and flexibility. Its lightweight nature allowed for rapid deployment and minimal resource consumption, ideal for high-density environments. Businesses leveraged its modular approach to scale efficiently while maintaining stability and performance.

What are the standout features?
  • Container Isolation: Ensures security and stability by isolating environments.
  • Efficient Resource Allocation: Dynamically manages system resources for optimal performance.
  • Rapid Deployment: Facilitates quick instance launches to meet business demands.
  • Scalability: Supports seamless scaling based on enterprise needs.
  • Lightweight Architecture: Reduces overhead, enhancing server efficiency.
What benefits and ROI should users look for?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces hardware investment by maximizing server use.
  • Enhanced Security: Provides robust isolation to protect against threats.
  • Increased Agility: Adapts quickly to changing requirements.
  • Improved Performance: Optimizes workloads with reduced resource strain.
  • Operational Simplicity: Streamlines management and maintenance efforts.

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] found application in industries like web hosting, where rapid provisioning and cost efficiency are crucial. It allowed providers to host numerous customer environments economically. In the education sector, it supported labs with diverse setups, improving accessibility and operational management.

Ingram Micro

VMware vSphere offers robust virtualization capabilities with features that enhance data center performance and optimize workloads. Centralized management and ease of deployment make it a cost-effective choice for many industries.

VMware vSphere is recognized for its high availability, vMotion, and Distributed Resource Scheduler, essential for efficient server infrastructure management. Users value its virtual machine management, seamless live migration, and strong resource allocation across data centers. Though the web client can be slow, and individual management of multiple ESXi hosts is challenging without central management, vSphere remains popular due to its flexibility and integration capabilities. While fault tolerance and free version features have their limitations, the product supports private clouds and hybrid cloud deployments effectively.

What are the key features of VMware vSphere?
  • High Availability: Ensures uptime through automatic failover and load balancing.
  • vMotion: Facilitates live migration without downtime.
  • Distributed Resource Scheduler: Optimizes workload distribution across servers.
  • Centralized Management: Simplifies administration tasks through single-pane control.
  • Resource Allocation: Allocates computing power and memory efficiently.
What benefits and ROI does VMware vSphere offer?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces hardware requirements and energy usage.
  • Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business requirements.
  • Improved Performance: Enhances application performance and reliability.
  • Flexibility: Supports integration with other technologies for operational agility.
  • Ease of Management: Simplifies monitoring and administrative efforts.

VMware vSphere is widely used in industries to manage server infrastructure effectively, hosting mission-critical applications like ERP and SQL servers. It supports development, testing, and backup environments, contributing to data center consolidation and cost reduction while enabling private and hybrid cloud setups.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

OzHosting.com, Triple C, ServerNest, Vastspace, Conetix
Abu Dhabi Ports Company, ACS, AIA New Zealand, Consona, Corporate Express, CS Energy, and Digiweb.
Buyer's Guide
Server Virtualization Software
February 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Proxmox and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.