Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Content Manager vs Oracle SAM-FS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
OpenText Content Manager is scalable but challenges arise with large deployments, suggesting planning and using cloud platforms for enhancement.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText Content Manager offers efficient document management with strong search, customization, integration, security, and large-scale enterprise support.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Content Manager needs enhancements in integration, usability, search, security, installation, pricing, and service responsiveness for better user experience.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Content Manager's stability is generally rated high, but integration and scalability issues affect some users' experiences.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
OpenText Content Manager support varies; users praise premium help but note deficiencies and complexity, especially after third-party involvement.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OpenText Content Manager's licensing is complex and expensive, but negotiation and customization are possible despite high ongoing costs.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Content Manager
Ranking in File Archiving
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (7th), Document Management Software (3rd)
Oracle SAM-FS
Ranking in File Archiving
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 4.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SAM-FS is 2.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

Maurice Riverso - PeerSpot reviewer
Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management
The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.
Use Oracle SAM-FS?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
SAM-FS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Missouri State Courts
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation, LG Fashion
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: November 2024.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.