OpenText Data Protector vs Quest NetVault Plus comparison

OpenText and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5, while Quest Software is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quest Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,521 Views
931 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Quest NetVault Plus

Read 11 Quest NetVault Plus reviews

1,350 Views
868 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Quest NetVault Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and Quest NetVault Plus compete in the data protection category. OpenText Data Protector seems to have the upper hand, excelling in feature set and integration capabilities, although Quest NetVault Plus performs strongly in terms of ease of deployment and user satisfaction.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers extensive integrations with SAP, Oracle, Exchange, SQL Server, VMware, and Unix, along with strong disaster recovery and deduplication capabilities. Its integration with HP's StoreOnce enhances its instant recovery feature. Quest NetVault Plus provides effective snapshot backups, high stability, and a user-friendly interface that can be accessed from any networked device.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve its user interface, reporting, and documentation. Licensing complexity and slow technical support response times are noted as drawbacks. Quest NetVault Plus needs improvements in command-line functionality, scheduling options, and MongoDB integration. Some users also report issues with hardware compatibility and technical support service levels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector provides deployment flexibility across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, though it is reportedly complex. Customer service experience varies, with some facing delays. Quest NetVault Plus supports both on-premises and private cloud deployments, receiving positive feedback for its stability and simpler licensing model, leading to higher customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is recognized for its extensive feature set, which comes at a high cost, but users find it justified for larger organizations. The expensive licensing model is a common concern. Quest NetVault Plus offers more flexible licensing, which may limit costs to necessary components. Despite this, both solutions are perceived as valuable due to their effective backup solutions, with ROI linked to reduced data loss risks and improved recovery operations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quest NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

47th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest NetVault Plus is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Isa Safii

Senior System Engineer at PT. Virtus Technology Indonesia

Comprehensive data protection and reliable backup capabilities enable smooth disaster recovery operations

The features of Quest NetVault Plus ( /products/quest-netvault-plus-reviews ) that are most valuable include the ability to pick up and restore to tape servers and external hard disks. It allows us to pick up from devices and then restore to the same devices or external server storage. Additionally, the application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was relatively easy."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"It works excellently only with Oracle."

"If you have an idea of what you are doing, it's very flexible and very stable."

"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."

"The user interface is good."

More Quest NetVault Plus pros

Cons

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"I do not think that this solution is relevant in the current IT market. They have not upgraded their features and functionalities which makes it difficult for them to remain competitive."

"We face challenges with its stability."

"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."

"In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that."

"Microfocus needs to build a partnership with other vendors in addition to HPE as far as cloud consolidation of backups."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"The initial setup is a little complex."

More Quest NetVault Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"The tool is expensive."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault ?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

The storage capacity is very low. The solution removes all the data in 15 days. We need the history for at least one or two months. I need the history whenever I run Tape. I need the details of the...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 74% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 40% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 13% of the time

Quest Rapid Recovery vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 13% of the time

vRanger vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 11% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 9% of the time

More Quest NetVault Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest NetVault Plus

April 2025

Download Quest NetVault Plus product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Quest NetVault Plus is used by organizations for efficient backup in environments such as retail machines, VMware, and virtual servers, including Hyper-V. It supports hybrid environments with Nutanix Xi.

Quest NetVault Plus is designed for backing up databases, applications, and security logs in hybrid environments. It includes a universal backup system with deduplication and allows data path mapping. Users install a client agent on PCs and a server agent for recovery tasks. Commonly used in industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus offers a web interface for network-wide access, dashboards for visualization, and reliable stability and reporting features. While appreciated for its backup management and efficient search capabilities, users desire improvements in its web interface and compatibility.

What are the key features of Quest NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locate tables and databases in backups.
Time-Saving Restoration: Speeds up recovery tasks.
Streamlined Management: Manage backups across different locations easily.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers network-wide access via an intuitive web interface.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides clear visibility of backup processes.

What benefits should organizations expect from Quest NetVault Plus?

Stability and Reporting: Reliable backup operations with built-in reporting tools.
Media Utilization: Optimize backup media usage for cost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Plan for storage needs with detailed reports.
Communication: Stay informed with email notifications on backup status.

In industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus is implemented by configuring agents on clients and servers for effective backup and recovery. Its adaptability in hybrid setups with Nutanix Xi enhances server backup management, while its dashboard and reporting capabilities assist in monitoring and optimizing backup workflows across sectors.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.