No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

OpenText and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while PortSwigger is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 11.3% mindshare in DAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.
OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews
  • 3,229 Views
  • 1,195 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...
Read 12 PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reviews
  • 2,269 Views
  • 476 Comparison Views
84% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are competitive products in the application security testing domain. OpenText is favored for its cost-effectiveness and support, while PortSwigger leads with robust features justifying its price.

Features: OpenText provides granular control for dynamic testing, comprehensive reporting capabilities, and strong integration options. PortSwigger offers advanced scanning capabilities, a highly customizable toolset, and superior automation features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its automation processes, expand customization options, and improve its scanning speed. PortSwigger may improve its cost-effectiveness, streamline integration processes with third-party tools, and enhance user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ensures straightforward deployment with efficient system integration and exceptional customer service. PortSwigger provides flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premise, supported by extensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a lower initial setup cost, providing substantial ROI with cost-effective solutions. PortSwigger has a higher upfront cost, countered by high functionality and adaptability that contribute to long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
DevSecOps (8th)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (36th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 11.3%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is 4.3%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing11.3%
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition4.3%
Other84.4%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

AP
ArnabPaul
Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.
Read full review
OB
Oussama Ben Taher
Studiant at Edifixio
Enables time-saving automated scanning and brute force attacks
The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically. Its automated scanning feature saves time. Additionally, using this tool provides significant security insights, making our testing process more efficient and comprehensive, leading to considerable time savings, which in turn translates to financial benefits.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."
"With it, you get a centralized board, you have a management view, enroll management and access management, everything is there."
"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."
"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."
"My experience with technical support has been good."
"The product is a good option for enterprise-level organizations."
"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros
"The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."
"The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features; however, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."
"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros
 

Cons

"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us."
"I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them."
"It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application."
"We have had a problem with authentification."
"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."
"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us."
"This solution is very expensive."
"I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons
"The stability is a big issue. So many times the scans fail."
"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."
"Scalability could be better."
"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."
"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."
"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."
"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
"It’s a fair price for the solution."
"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."
"The price is okay."
"This solution is very expensive."
"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."
"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?
While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?
I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?
I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional features or services.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?
It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?
I work with security testing tools for SaaS, focusing on static application security testing and using tools like Burp Suite for replaying Apex.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 23% of the time
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors
Seal Security vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Logo
Seal Security vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Compared 34% of the time
Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Compared 8% of the time
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Logo
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Compared 7% of the time
Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Logo
Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Compared 6% of the time
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Compared 3% of the time
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
March 2026
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
March 2026
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reportDownload PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
  • Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
  • Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
  • Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.
What benefits should users expect from reviews?
  • Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
  • Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
  • Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
  • Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is an automated web vulnerability scanner, designed to enable enterprises to scale security across their web portfolios and achieve DevSecOps. Automate trusted Burp scans, integrate web security testing with development, and free your application security to support software development.

PortSwigger
 

Sample Customers

Aaron's
Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
February 2026
Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.
See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.