Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Operations Bridge vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

OpenText and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. OpenText is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.3, while VMware is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to VMware’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of VMware users who would recommend it.
OpenText Operations Bridge
Read 48 OpenText Operations Bridge reviews
  • 285 Views
  • 139 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
VMware Aria Operations for ...
Read 12 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews
  • 1,021 Views
  • 922 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Operations Bridge and VMware Aria Operations for Applications compete in the network monitoring and event management category. VMware Aria Operations for Applications seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless cloud monitoring and ease of deployment, especially in Kubernetes environments.

Features: OpenText Operations Bridge offers integration capabilities, comprehensive visibility across networks, and manages large volumes to provide a holistic view of business services. VMware Aria Operations for Applications provides seamless monitoring across cloud environments, supports open-source technologies, and is particularly effective in Kubernetes.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Bridge could improve its scalability, modernize its interface, and address performance issues. VMware Aria Operations for Applications would benefit from more predictable costs, initial setup simplification, and better dashboard customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Bridge can be deployed on-premises and in hybrid clouds but is seen as complex with varied customer support experiences. VMware Aria Operations for Applications also supports on-premises and hybrid deployments and is noted for its strengths in open-source and cloud-native integrations, although it faces similar support issues.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Bridge is considered expensive with complex licensing but offers significant ROI in large environments. VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a consolidated pricing model with positive ROI feedback, though its upfront costs and licensing challenges are notable.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Bridge
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
30th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (10th)
VMware Aria Operations for ...
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (29th), Container Monitoring (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility
The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.
Read full review
ToniLindberg - PeerSpot reviewer
Troubleshooting capabilities have improved application monitoring and support engagement
I can see what happens end to end, which is pretty beneficial. The solution has troubleshooting capabilities, providing a direct connection to knowledge base articles from VMware Broadcom. When I encounter an error, I can search directly within the system to see what solutions have been employed by others. It has a familiar interface, which makes it easy to get started.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"The broad integration possibilities, I'd say, with any kind of product, are probably the most valuable feature."
"OpsBridge has good event correlation facilities and root-cause identification algorithms."
"We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches."
"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."
"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."
More OpenText Operations Bridge pros
"People are very pleased with the implementation."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."
"I find VMware Aria Operations for Applications to be very stable, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"I gladly recommend VMware Aria Operations for Applications because it is cost effective and has commendable AI response capabilities."
"No issues with stability."
"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."
"Tanzu itself, integrated with multiple solutions, bestows support and security upon a container platform, especially when it comes to managing open-source container platforms such as Kubernetes."
"It significantly improves application performance management by offering recommendations for resource allocation to avoid wastage or overcommitment."
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros
 

Cons

"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"Implementation could be improved."
"The pricing could be improved."
"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."
"We are waiting for quicker release cycles. Also containerized upgrade, so that you don't have to bring a system entirely down to make a minor upgrade, in fact, or a minor patch."
More OpenText Operations Bridge cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."
"The solution could be expensive, which might be a limiting factor."
"An area for improvement would be more in-depth reporting, such as analyzing disk IO during business hours compared to after hours."
"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."
"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."
"The return on investment is best suited for organizations that do not have the resources for a dedicated VM environment team. However, the cost of the product doesn't show significant benefits."
"I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases."
"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
"It is competitive."
"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
"The cost is very high."
"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."
"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."
"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."
"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
It is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?
The cost of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is fair and reasonable compared to what we receive in support and packages from VMware.
See all answers
What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?
I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?
Our primary use case for VMware Aria Operations for Applications is to enhance application monitoring tasks, allowing us to set up alerts for different components and send them via SMTP to a team d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 41% of the time
SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 33% of the time
BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 26% of the time
More OpenText Operations Bridge Competitors
Grafana vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications Logo
Grafana vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Compared 13% of the time
Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications Logo
Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Compared 11% of the time
Zabbix vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications Logo
Zabbix vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Compared 7% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Compared 6% of the time
Prometheus Group vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications Logo
Prometheus Group vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Compared 6% of the time
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge
March 2025
OpenText Operations Bridge reportDownload OpenText Operations Bridge product report
Buyer's Guide
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
March 2025
VMware Aria Operations for Applications reportDownload VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability
 

Overview

OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.
OpenText

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time. 

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

VMware
 

Sample Customers

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications
March 2025
Free Report: OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Operations Bridge vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.