Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Operations Bridge vs SCOM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Bridge
Ranking in Event Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)
SCOM
Ranking in Event Monitoring
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 5.9%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 7.2%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Volodymyr Bondarchuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 29, 2022
Has instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure
I have experience with other solutions apart from Micro Focus Operations Bridge, for example, NetIQ Operations Center and NetIQ AppManager. I also have experience with network performance monitoring solutions, for example, Microsoft SCOM, and some open-source products, such as Nagios and Zabbix. What makes Micro Focus Operations Bridge better than others is that it works as an umbrella and includes different models for different types of monitoring. At the same time, an open-source product does not give you this kind of functionality. Instead, an open-source product only gives you classic monitoring functionalities in some areas of network performance but not for all areas of monitoring solutions or infrastructure. Microsoft SCOM, at the moment, has many new features, and it's similar to Micro Focus which focuses on network performance and traffic monitoring, so my company uses it together with Micro Focus for monitoring.
MarcMermuys - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Has efficient monitoring with robust integration capabilities
We use SCOM to configure different monitors using several management packs. It integrates systems like Active Directory and correlates them, and it is used for monitoring and managing systems SCOM allows integration of several systems, providing correlation between different systems such as…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has the capability to display overall health of the infrastructure and is very useful for executive reports on the health of the infrastructure."
"It's a very good product overall."
"It has greatly reduced the number and duration of outages as support teams are notified immediately when something goes wrong or even before something breaks."
"OpsBridge has good event correlation facilities and root-cause identification algorithms."
"We use the on-premises version to monitor our systems and manage emails. All our systems use Operations Bridge, especially the critical systems."
"It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's."
"I've found the solution to be very scalable."
"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."
"Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"It's easy to use."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."
"The monitoring features are the most valuable. We have seen a major benefit from that so far."
"It can send messages to our ticketing system."
"It is very good at monitoring Microsoft Server."
 

Cons

"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"The pricing could be improved."
"We are waiting for quicker release cycles. Also containerized upgrade, so that you don't have to bring a system entirely down to make a minor upgrade, in fact, or a minor patch."
"Reporting has to be tackled a bit more. Conceptually, it is there and conceptually it is amazing, but somehow the module itself is suffering."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"Then there is also an issue with capacity and limited space. That is something that needs to be improved."
"In future releases, I would like to see APM solutions and dashboards like Grafana."
"They could provide better dashboards, detailed logs, and reports crucial for monitoring services in real-time."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."
"The configurations could be better. There are multiple tests where you can do something, but they can be a trigger as well. The overriding methodologies are not that easy. The configurations are difficult. The configuration and thorough day-to-day operations to get them to the level you want takes some time. It's very difficult."
"The initial setup should be easier to complete."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
"It is competitive."
"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
"The cost is very high."
"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."
"SCOM is very cheap because it's included in the license for the System Center suite, which is around $8,400 per CAL."
"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."
"I don't know the exact cost because it's managed by our sales team, but Microsoft is on the higher side."
"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."
"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."
"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."
"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices a...
What do you like most about SCOM?
The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?
The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support.
What needs improvement with SCOM?
Might be the APM (Application Performance Monitoring) solutions, which it lacks compared to other tools. I don't know what other tools are in the market, so I don't know what SCOM lacks. I need to ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
Dialog Telekom
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Operations Bridge vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.