OpenText UFT One vs Opkey comparison

OpenText and Smart Software Testing Solutions are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Smart Software Testing Solutions is ranked #26. OpenText holds a 10.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Smart Software Testing Solutions’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText UFT One

Read 92 OpenText UFT One reviews

9,097 Views
5,686 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Opkey

691 Views
525 Comparison Views

OpenText UFT One

Opkey

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Opkey based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th)

Opkey

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.5%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opkey is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

Sep 29, 2022

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Use Opkey?

Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"It's an expensive solution."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...

See all answers

Which solution is better for the automation of Oracle Cloud testing: CloudTestr or Opkey?

CloudTestr and Opkey are both popular test automation tools for automating Oracle Cloud testing. Here is a comparison of the two tools: CloudTestr Pros: Cloud-based Easy to use Supports a wide ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Opkey

Compared 81% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Opkey

Compared 12% of the time

CloudTestr vs Opkey

Compared 6% of the time

More Opkey Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

October 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download Opkey product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Smart Software Testing Solutions

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

By following the principles of Automated Test First development, OpKey enables manual testers and SMEs in Agile teams to write automated tests as the features are being developed. Then using its patent pending Tool Agnostic engine, Opkey executes these tests with any automation tool that you have (selenium, HP UFT, Sahi, IBM RFT or any of the 8 tool that we support). You can execute your tests locally, on OpKey CLoud or popular servcies like Sauce Labs and Browser Stack.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.