OpenText UFT One vs Postman comparison

Read 57 Postman reviews

8,011 Views
6,390 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Postman cater to different aspects of software testing. Postman seems to have the upper hand due to better overall user feedback and faster return on investment.

Features: OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation, integration with various development environments, and comprehensive functional testing. Postman is favored for ease of use, extensive API testing features, and collaboration tools. Users find Postman's features more intuitive and practical compared to OpenText UFT One.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One needs better performance, more modern options, and an easier interface. Postman users seek enhancements in response time, minor improvements in the testing environment, and better offline capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One faces challenges with its complex deployment and requires considerable effort. Customer service receives mixed reviews. Postman enjoys straightforward deployment and better user feedback for customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is often seen as expensive with a slower ROI. Postman is more affordable, providing good value and quicker ROI according to user feedback.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Postman Report (Updated: December 2024).

OpenText UFT One vs. Postman

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.5

Organizations using OpenText UFT One experience up to 300% ROI through enhanced efficiency and 60% test automation.

Sentiment score

8.2

Postman's streamlined API workflows enhance collaboration, reduce manual testing time, minimize errors, and improve productivity, leading to cost savings.

Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

OpenText UFT One's customer service is praised for expertise but faces challenges with response speed and technician knowledge variability.

Sentiment score

6.5

Postman users mostly rely on documentation and community, with mixed reviews on support responsiveness and effectiveness.

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The technical support is rated eight out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Senior developer at Digital world advisory

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText UFT One is highly scalable, adaptable for varying team sizes, with some execution speed challenges in large test suites.

Sentiment score

7.2

Postman is scalable for large teams, but performance issues under heavy load suggest the need for additional testing tools.

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

Opinions on OpenText UFT One's stability vary, with some users experiencing stability issues influenced by system specifications and configurations.

Sentiment score

8.0

Postman is stable and reliable with minor issues in connection, RAM usage, and improved browser-based performance.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.

Full Stack JS(ReactJS/NodeJS) & IBM Integration Bus(IIB) Developer at Eviden France

The tool is generally stable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Senior developer at Digital world advisory

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One needs improvements in compatibility, performance, technology support, integration, cost, and usability for enhanced user experience.

Postman users seek enhanced automation, intuitive interface, improved integrations, better pricing, and advanced testing features for performance support.

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.

Senior developer at Digital world advisory

Something that could be better is the inclusion of another type of test, for example, end-to-end tests.

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Full Stack JS(ReactJS/NodeJS) & IBM Integration Bus(IIB) Developer at Eviden France

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One is costly but valued for reducing manual testing and enhancing automation efficiency, sometimes offering discounts.

Postman's flexible pricing offers free and licensed options, praised for cost-effectiveness and competitive plans for enterprise customers.

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.

Senior developer at Digital world advisory

The price is low, making it a reasonable price for the product.

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Full Stack JS(ReactJS/NodeJS) & IBM Integration Bus(IIB) Developer at Eviden France

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One is versatile, supporting multiple platforms with AI capabilities and robust integration for comprehensive test automation.

Postman offers a user-friendly interface, automation, API compatibility, automated testing, and flexible sharing, boosting productivity and accessibility.

The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.

Senior developer at Digital world advisory

In Postman, we have collections that contain multiple endpoints that I can test.

For more quotes and insights, download the Postman report

Full Stack JS(ReactJS/NodeJS) & IBM Integration Bus(IIB) Developer at Eviden France

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in API Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Postman

Ranking in API Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (12th), API Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 11.8%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman is 18.1%, down from 25.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network

There is a product called Guidewire that sends the data in an XML format. It's like a policy load. That information we trigger in Kafka. Kafka will take the information and send it to the REST API. With Kafka, they wanted to make two APIs to consolidate the effort. At that time, we are using the POST API tool. This tool is helping us to synchronize everything.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The user interface could be improved.

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

What do you like most about Postman?

The product is easy to implement.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

The price is low, making it a reasonable price for the product.

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Comparisons

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman

Compared 28% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Postman

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Postman

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman

Compared 2% of the time

Product Reports

Download OpenText UFT One product report

OpenText UFT One

November 2024

Download Postman product report

December 2024

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera