Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Postman comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
OpenText customer service is praised for responsiveness, though experiences vary, with mixed satisfaction levels and reliance on partners for support.
Sentiment score
6.6
Postman users mostly rely on documentation and community, with mixed reviews on support responsiveness and effectiveness.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
OpenText UFT One needs better object identification, browser compatibility, AI, integration, and interface, with concerns on cost and stability.
Sentiment score
5.7
Postman users seek enhanced automation, intuitive interface, improved integrations, better pricing, and advanced testing features for performance support.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Something that could be better is the inclusion of another type of test, for example, end-to-end tests.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText UFT One offers scalability and flexibility, though users note speed and browser issues; licensing affects usage costs.
Sentiment score
6.5
Postman is scalable for large teams, but performance issues under heavy load suggest the need for additional testing tools.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation but criticized for high costs and complex licensing options.
Sentiment score
7.0
Postman's flexible pricing offers free and licensed options, praised for cost-effectiveness and competitive plans for enterprise customers.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
The price is low, making it a reasonable price for the product.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText UFT One's stability is generally reliable but varies with system requirements and can be affected by version changes.
Sentiment score
8.1
Postman is stable and reliable with minor issues in connection, RAM usage, and improved browser-based performance.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
OpenText UFT One excels in cross-platform compatibility, versatile scripting, and efficient automation for desktop, web, and mobile testing.
Sentiment score
8.4
Postman offers a user-friendly interface, automation, API compatibility, automated testing, and flexible sharing, boosting productivity and accessibility.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
In Postman, we have collections that contain multiple endpoints that I can test.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in API Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
Postman
Ranking in API Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
API Management (12th), API Monitoring Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 11.6%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman is 19.0%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Raghvendra Jyothi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network
There is a product called Guidewire that sends the data in an XML format. It's like a policy load. That information we trigger in Kafka. Kafka will take the information and send it to the REST API. With Kafka, they wanted to make two APIs to consolidate the effort. At that time, we are using the POST API tool. This tool is helping us to synchronize everything.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...
How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
What do you like most about Postman?
The product is easy to implement.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
Postman is economical and is considered to be rather cheap compared to other software solutions.
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Postman and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.