OpenText UFT One vs Qualibrate comparison

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

151 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Qualibrate compete in the software testing domain. OpenText UFT One generally takes an upper hand in advanced testing and deployment flexibility for large enterprises, while Qualibrate excels in simplified testing processes for rapid implementation.

Features: OpenText UFT One offers extensive support for multiple protocols, robust automation suited for complex environments, and comprehensive integration capabilities. Qualibrate provides intuitive process documentation, efficient testing features to reduce cycle times, and promotes collaboration within teams.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One can be overwhelming for smaller teams, and reducing the complexity of its feature set could be beneficial. It requires significant setup and infrastructure, which could be optimized for ease of use. Its deployment process could be streamlined to suit less complex environments. Qualibrate could enhance its testing capabilities for more complex projects. It might benefit from expanding its integration options with third-party tools and improving its protocol support for a wider range of testing scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualibrate's cloud-based deployment simplifies adoption, needing minimal infrastructure and offering strong customer support during implementation. OpenText UFT One supports hybrid models, which is beneficial for complex ecosystems, but requires more customer interaction for smooth deployment.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One has a higher setup cost reflecting its capabilities, delivering significant ROI when fully utilized in complex setups. Qualibrate is more cost-effective with quick value realization, attractive for teams focusing on cost-efficiency and fast returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: March 2025).

OpenText UFT One vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.5

OpenText UFT One enhances efficiency and productivity with automation, AI capabilities, and supports achieving up to 300% ROI.

Sentiment score

8.1

Users saved time, reduced defects, expedited market entry, and anticipated positive ROI with successful automation implementation.

The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

OpenText UFT One's customer service is generally efficient but inconsistent, with varied experiences in support quality and response time.

Sentiment score

7.4

Qualibrate offers reliable support with quick responses, but some users note delays in acknowledging support requests.

Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The technical support is rated eight out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText UFT One is scalable, integrating with Jenkins, but success depends on licensing, automation quality, and deployment strategy.

Sentiment score

7.3

Qualibrate efficiently supports scalable automated testing and increased workflow demands, accommodating diverse projects with plans for expansion.

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

OpenText UFT One generally exhibits stability, though some users report performance issues, often resolved through updates. Satisfaction remains high.

Sentiment score

8.0

Qualibrate is seen as generally reliable, with stability improvements and prompt support communication, but potential for further enhancement remains.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One requires improvements in stability, compatibility, speed, memory use, object recognition, and integration with open-source tools.

Qualibrate's reporting and integration need improvements, with users seeking better support, test designing, scheduling, and automated alerts.

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One licensing is costly, leading organizations to mix different license types and evaluate ROI against open-source alternatives.

Qualibrate provides cost-effective, flexible licensing, appealing to enterprises for its integration with SAP Solution Manager and competitive pricing.

The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.

Senior Manager at Deloitte

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One provides versatile automation with cross-platform compatibility, easy use, robust testing, and integration with key technologies.

Qualibrate simplifies test automation with a low-code interface, seamless SAP integration, and efficient process documentation and playback.

UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualibrate report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

38th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

39th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.1%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Reviewer148493

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

OpenText UFT One

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

OpenText UFT One vs. Qualibrate