OpenText UFT One and ReadyAPI are two leading solutions in the testing software market. OpenText UFT One is often seen as a robust choice for enterprise environments due to its compatibility with numerous applications, whereas ReadyAPI offers a specialized focus on API testing, appealing to organizations focused on API performance and security.
Features: OpenText UFT One supports a range of testing capabilities such as GUI, API, and business process testing across various platforms which include SAP, Oracle, and mobile. It provides features like 64-bit COM object references and HTML5 support. ReadyAPI focuses on API testing, offering a unified solution for functional, load, and security testing, and supports integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins. It effectively handles different API types and environments, which simplifies test case creation.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One users report issues with speed, resource usage, and browser compatibility. Enhancements in IDE intuitiveness and better open-source tool integration are suggested. Its cost and complex licensing are also common concerns. ReadyAPI, while straightforward, could improve in cloud integration and performance testing features. Its user interface and version control have room for optimization, necessitating separate licenses for diverse testing aspects.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One primarily supports on-premises deployment with some cloud options but typically requires technical expertise for setup. Customer support is considered decent but varies with the support contract level. ReadyAPI offers similar deployment models favoring on-premises. Its customer service is generally praised, although technical support can be complex, particularly regarding licensing.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is viewed as costly with a complex licensing scheme, yet its comprehensive functionality delivers significant ROI for large enterprises. ReadyAPI presents more flexible pricing, aligning it with varied testing needs without unnecessary module purchases. Its cost is moderate, yielding good ROI by enhancing productivity and integration efficiencies.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.