Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios comparison

Oracle and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Planview is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Oracle holds a 4.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Read 9 Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management reviews

1,490 Views
611 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Read 65 Planview Portfolios reviews

3,071 Views
1,290 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Planview Portfolios

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planview Portfolios and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management are leading solutions in portfolio management for enterprises needing substantial project oversight. Planview Portfolios holds an advantage with more favorable pricing and support, while Oracle Primavera is noted for its advanced features justifying a higher investment.

Features: Planview Portfolios offers customizable dashboards, real-time collaboration, and a user-friendly approach to management. Oracle Primavera is equipped with robust risk management, advanced forecasting capabilities, and comprehensive project tracking, addressing the needs of complex project structures.

Room for Improvement: Planview Portfolios could enhance its integration with other enterprise systems, improve scalability for larger enterprises, and streamline reporting capabilities for more intuitive use. Oracle Primavera may benefit from a simpler user interface, reduced complexity in initial setup, and smoother updates without disrupting current workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios is recognized for its straightforward, cloud-based deployment and solid customer support, simplifying integration for new users. Oracle Primavera, while requiring a more intricate on-premises setup, provides tailored customer service for enterprise-level needs, focusing on complex project requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios is praised for its competitive pricing and clear ROI benefits for mid-sized organizations, focusing on affordability and support. Oracle Primavera demands higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI for projects requiring advanced features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,180 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is 4.2%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 6.2%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Planview Portfolios	6.2%
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management	4.2%
Other	89.6%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2710611

Director at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees

Ensures data consistency and improves stakeholder transparency while needing pricing adjustments

It is beneficial to have the schedule updated so you can have control of the cost. When you have a change in the schedule, you can also make a change in the cost. For us, it is mostly important to control dates and to be on time, but also to know the cash flow. With both of our clients, they use Power BI extensively. Though it may not be the best solution, they have all the tools connected to Power BI, which they primarily use for reporting. The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely. The connection between Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Unifier is not difficult to establish, and the information obtained is really reliable.

Read full review

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely."

"The solution's tech support is good."

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management pros

"The sheer amount of information available in one single interface is valuable. Everything is there. It is also a lot of work to maintain all the information, but generally, you can find everything you need within this one tool."

"It maps back to our SDLC process pretty well. I'm able to see the stage of where things are at. We also use Azure DevOps for all of our requirements and our coding."

"Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and collaboration platforms."

"Whenever we have issues, there is always someone ready to help us. Their people are knowledgeable and responsive. They get to tickets quickly. Just three or four weeks ago, we were having issues with getting data into Planview. We submitted a ticket and the turnaround was probably 45 minutes to get a response."

"The most valuable feature for me is the ease and customizability of reporting."

"The look and feel of it is pretty clean."

"We provided whatever feedback we had to the Planview team, and they went in and built those additional features that we requested. For example, they created a great way for our users to search for a specific resource, project, program, or role. We were not using some of the features, and we wanted them to not be visible, and they helped us with that. They also brought a feature to provide visibility into when a resource was never assigned to any task. There was no visibility to this before. This feature was really very good for visibility into the resource portfolio."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is one of the best features. They have very good data warehousing. You can put that out. You can tell that data warehousing from Planview Enterprise One is excellent."

More Planview Portfolios pros

Cons

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."

"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management cons

"The outcome management and work resource management in terms of teams needs improvement. Team handling, how team requirements are generated, and how the resource managers can work with teams needs to be improved."

"We've been using it for a while, so it's about maturity. It's about being able to build out things in Agile groups and teams and some of that. Then really trying to drive into the direction of Lean Portfolio Management and more Agile program management, I think is where we're heading."

"It could do with a quicker response time for some reports or portfolios."

"I think that the user interface needs some getting used to. It's not immediately intuitive. That's potentially room for improvement. I think also that an organization needs to have good support from some senior management to get something like Planview established."

"The solution is stable. However, it's so robust, there's so much data, that it has the tendency to lag."

"Our challenge will be this tool is complex. It is not necessarily easy to start and learn from the beginning. How do you get people who are not professionals to adopt it, use it, and not be mean about it?"

"The resource area needs improvement. The improvements that have been made recently in the later versions have been good improvements, but I think there are some more improvements needed there."

"The technical support is a little overworked. At least, they have been in the past year. We need them to focus on somethings from time to time. You can tell that they're really focusing on many things. It has gotten better, but I think they could still use some relief."

More Planview Portfolios cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."

"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

"We are on the Flex licenses."

"Planview is a little pricey. From a licensing perspective, for just a simple timesheet user who does nothing in the system but reports time, the licensing is a little pricey, but you have to look at it from what it is that you get. We have 6,000 users, and I don't manage the system at all. I just have to do add them to the system. The servers, maintenance, OS levels, security patching for the OS, and all other things are not something that we maintain. So, you have to look at it from an operational perspective. It is not just the product itself. A holistic view has to be taken when you look at the product and how you're going to support it. I would have to hire an entire operation staff to bring it in-house, and at the end of the day, that might cost me more."

"I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo. Pricing details from ten years ago are not committed to memory, and I would have to refer back to doc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Because we use mostly P6 and we do not use OPC, which is the new cloud version that is visually easier to use, I would rate it as an eight.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

We try to use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management combined with Unifier. Unifier is a cost control tool. It is mostly used in oil and gas, mining, and construction industries, but predominantly i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Planview Portfolios?

Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) syst...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Enhancements are needed in: Advanced reporting and analytics: While Planview Management provides robust reporting and analytics capabilities, further enhancements could include more advanced data v...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

We use Planview Management to assess the current project portfolio, evaluate resource availability, and prioritize projects based on strategic objectives, ROI, and risk factors. Planview Management...

See all answers

Comparisons

Adobe Workfront vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 14% of the time

Planisware vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

LeanIX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

January 2026

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

January 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Also Known As

Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

Overview

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.

Oracle

Planview Portfolios equips leaders in strategic portfolio management to enhance investment confidence and market responsiveness through seamless strategy connection, planning, delivery, and outcomes, offering both cloud and on-premises options.

Planview Portfolios supports executives and portfolio managers by improving strategic execution with automated and adaptable processes. It integrates strategy and outcomes by aligning business and technology plans to optimize funding and resource capacity. Features include end-to-end visibility, which allows tracking of strategic initiatives and the ability to analyze performance data using key metrics. It also provides dynamic planning and funding via scenario modeling, allowing businesses to adapt funding based on outcomes while ensuring balanced investments against capacity.

What are the key features of Planview Portfolios?

Strategic Alignment: Connects OKRs with execution processes.
End-to-End Visibility: Assesses performance with KPIs for strategic decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Scenario modeling for incremental funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances resources and dependencies.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns tech investments with priorities.
Adaptive Program Management: Integrates planning and cross-functional teams.

What benefits do users gain from using Planview Portfolios?

Customization and Interface: Offers tailored layouts and an intuitive interface.
Centralized Management: Manages projects and resources effectively.
Robust Reporting: Features Power BI integration for comprehensive reports.
Agile Integration: Supports agile practices alongside traditional methods.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team collaboration across departments.

Planview Portfolios sees extensive use across industries like IT, financial planning, and resource management. Global companies implement it for managing projects, resource allocation, and strategic planning. It's crucial for end-to-end project management, including investment planning, capacity management, and connecting agile with traditional resource planning, supporting departments worldwide in project execution.

Planview

Sample Customers

Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios

February 2026

Free Report: Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Portfolios report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.