Panaya Test Dynamix vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Panaya and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Panaya is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.3. Panaya holds a 1.1% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

862 Views
445 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

640 Views
530 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Panaya Test Dynamix and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (2nd), Test Management Tools (12th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.5%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 14, 2022

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Faiz Ahmed

Test Automation Specialist / Lead at Tata Consultancy Services

Oct 24, 2022

You can achieve any complex task with this tool

There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases. For example, it would be nice to have a Selenium plugin available from the menu, where I can select "open browser" and provide the URL. That URL would be immediately open in the browser. This is like a keyword, and then the Selenium plugin should be there.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"It's a very simple solution to use."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."

"The solution scales well."

"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."

"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."

Cons

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"The UI should be improved."

"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it."

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"It is free of charge."

"The cost is not that bad."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?

The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?

Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 68% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 13% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 7% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Postman vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 81% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 11% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Apigee vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 2% of the time

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 2% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

October 2024

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

October 2024

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

SoapUI NG Pro

Learn More

Panaya

SmartBear

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test

October 2024

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.