Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pentera vs Verodin comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Pentera is scalable, adaptable, and well-rated, efficiently supporting diverse user numbers and operations with minimal team maintenance.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Pentera excels in vulnerability assessment and protection, offering automated solutions for on-prem and cloud infrastructure with ease of use.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.9
Pentera needs improvements in graphic card support, dashboard specificity, licensing options, flexibility, and scalability for enhanced testing and monitoring.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Pentera is highly praised for its stability, quickly resolving early bugs, making it a reliable network tool choice.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Pentera's customer service is responsive and helpful, though expertise varies; technical support is highly rated despite some delays.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Pentera users view licensing costs variably, yet agree on its effectiveness and value in enhancing cybersecurity and ransomware protection.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Pentera
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (12th), Penetration Testing Services (1st)
Verodin
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
11th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Pentera is 27.8%, up from 25.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Verodin is 1.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Marlow - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization
The tool is quite scalable. There's a one-to-one relationship between the engine and how many scans we can do. We can only do one scan with one engine. We had some issues around the password assessments because we added a lot of users. It took a long time. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. We have three users in our organization.
reviewer945171 - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine
The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it seem like it was easy, it wasn't easy. There was a lot of stuff that we had to do that we ended up having to do via an API or something special for a new case. That's a big issue for me. Integration is daunting. It leaves a lot of room for failure and frustration. There are just little nuances that make everything difficult. You're supposed to be able to flip this toggle thing here, and you're supposed to be able to get the feedthrough from Splunk. Then, from there everything should be perfectly fine. However, when you find out it is not perfectly fine and you find out that it's because this thing isn't necessarily correct, you have to do an update on it or they have to update their file to make it work correctly. It's very small, minute things that aren't quite right. It's not something that you can really pinpoint. There's a lot of nuanced issues. It the nuanced technical issues that you would notice once you cross its path. It's not one of those "Hey, this is something I would know off the top of my head." They are very small nuance issues that make you say "Oh, well I guess we've got to go and change this thing now." You get this with certain tools - mostly with Mandiant tools more than anything else in general. It's one of those Mandiant quirks that still carries on and persists to this day - even with this tool.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pentera?
What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
What needs improvement with Pentera?
One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring.
What is your primary use case for Pentera?
Our customers use the product to validate their security environment, ensuring that vulnerabilities within the network are identified and addressed.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.