PeopleStrong vs Zoho Recruit comparison

"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."

"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."

"It is priced low."

"The UI and UX are fantastic."

"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."

"The mobile responsiveness is strong."

"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."

"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."

"The solution is secure and also very user friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Zoho Recruit is I can compete with the larger vendors in the business. I am constantly changing the configuration and the solution adapts to my needs."

"There are two features I love in Zoho Recruit. The first one is mass customization. I can customize the blueprint how I like, add some steps I want to include, and schedule a date and time to send the emails. I can also use a lot of templates. Secondly, the best thing about Zoho is the customer service. Whenever I have an issue or want to upgrade something, I text them through Zoho, and they respond within 40 seconds."

"The pricing seems to be very reasonable."

"The installation process isn't very complicated."

"The solution provides the ability to integrate with other Zoho apps, allowing us to automate the hiring process."

"Good reporting feature."

"The customization feature is the most valuable. I can add candidates to the system without having to go into it manually. I can look at a LinkedIn or PNet profile and literally right-click on it and pass that candidate into my database almost completely. It is 100% accurate for 90% of the time. It also has good security. I can't log in without a fingerprint. To log in, I have to give a fingerprint on my smartphone."

"They could improve talent management capabilities."

"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."

"PeopleStrong could make it AI-friendly."

"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."

"The global scalability and support could improve."

"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."

"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."

"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."

"There is a limit to the number of lines you can extract."

"It lacks the functionality for finalizing the process when a successful placement is made. There is no invoicing. It is missing the functionality for setting the placement and a start date. I do permanent placements as well as contractors, but it is not really geared towards contractors. So, I have to have a separate solution to manage contractors, timesheets, and things like that. It is just a bit of a pain. It is not as simple as some of the competitors, but it is far more able. There is a lot more to it, and it does a lot more than what any of the competitors currently do, which makes it a little bit more complicated to use, but it is easy enough. None of my staff have any issues. In all such solutions, you have to feed more than what they give you. It is a database at the end of the day, and I would like it to give me things. I would like to load a lead or get someone to just load leads all day, and I would like it to come back to me and say, "There's this position that you've loaded, and these candidates match. Can I send it?" I'd like it to be a little bit more proactive and feed me as much information as I feed it."

"There's a bit of a learning curve."

"The pricing could be a bit more reasonable."

"No ability to automatically update details."

"Its automation is currently complicated, and it could be better. The biggest problem is that their instructions, videos, and documentation are terrible. These should be improved. I would like to see an email tracking feature and an option to find email addresses and leads."

"Candidate filtering is a little cumbersome. I would love to see all the design and effort Zoho put in to the administrative user experience also be applied to the manager experience side. Quite a bit of filtering has to be done to get to what you want. Also, you can't get through many candidates because Zoho Recruit has a cap on how many candidates you can view at a time. If you've got hundreds of candidates per job, you may have to scroll through 10 pages."

"Zoho Recruit could benefit from increased flexibility and customization when creating and sending offer letters to new recruits."

"It's very reasonably priced. It is paid per employee."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"Zoho Recruit is an affordable solution in comparison to BambooHR and costs relatively the same as Greenhouse implementation wise. It costs less than $100 per user. Large organizations will be able to get enterprise pricing, and Zoho is transparent with their pricing."

"I think it costs about $40 per month for a recruiter account. It comes with ten free accounts. It's well worth the money we are paying."

"In terms of cost, Zoho is by far the most reasonable for what you're getting. You get the option of monthly or yearly price. It is one cost per person for a license, and it is reasonable. My solutions are $50 per person per month."

"The cost of each user depends on the size of our user base."

"The more you scale the solution the more it will cost. If you want the vendor to do the implementation or migration there are extra fees."

"It is in the middle price range. Everything is included in the price."