PTC Integrity vs PractiTest comparison

PractiTest and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PractiTest is ranked #21, while PTC is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. PractiTest holds a 0.4% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

173 Views
117 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

2,028 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

PractiTest

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and PractiTest compete as application lifecycle management solutions. PractiTest has an advantage due to its intuitive configuration and reporting capabilities, appealing to a broad user base with its ease of use and effective feature set combined with practical pricing.

Features: PTC Integrity's features include robust integration capabilities with third-party tools, comprehensive version control options, and efficient system customization. PractiTest's features focus on a user-friendly interface for test management, customizable reports and dashboards, and advanced integration with JIRA and other platforms.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could improve in terms of reducing complexity in its infrastructure setup and enhancing its user interface to be more intuitive. Additionally, a more responsive customer support system would offer better user assistance. PractiTest would benefit from expanding its feature set to include more advanced automation capabilities, offering deeper integration with additional third-party tools, and providing more detailed documentation to assist new users in maximizing its capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest, with its cloud-based deployment model, allows quick setup and requires minimal IT resources. Known for its responsive and helpful customer service, PractiTest offers a straightforward deployment process. In contrast, PTC Integrity requires a more extensive infrastructure setup, making it complex to deploy, and has room to enhance its customer service to match user expectations.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity involves a higher initial setup cost, which can affect long-term ROI perception negatively. PractiTest offers a more cost-effective initial investment, leading to a potentially quicker ROI. This affordable entry cost, combined with its efficient feature set, makes PractiTest an attractive option for organizations that prioritize budget efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (18th)

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 26% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 19% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 61% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

March 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

No data available

MKS

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest

March 2025

Free Report: PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PTC Integrity vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.