SAP Process Orchestration vs SnapLogic comparison

"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."

"It is simple to transfer files."

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."

"It is a scalable solution."

"An important tool for building prototypes and MVPs than can seamlessly turn into production jobs"

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"I used the free trial."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."