SAP Process Orchestration vs SnapLogic comparison

"SAP Process Orchestration is quite flexible in supporting various integration standards and protocols, and it's fulfilling all our needs."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

"SAP Process Orchestration offers easy maintainability and is a very flexible tool that easily adapts to any integration standards and artifacts that are readily available."

"The solution is easy to use."

"SAP Process Orchestration provides extensive integrations with external partners, supports B2B operations, and has prepackaged content that saves development time."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

"An important tool for building prototypes and MVPs than can seamlessly turn into production jobs"

"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."

"One of the best features SnapLogic offers is its user-friendly interface."

"The solution could improve its API management."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features."

"It is a stable solution."

"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."

"The solution could be more scalable."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

"Some configurations can be a little tricky."

"The solution needs to move to the cloud."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"The support is the most important improvement they could make."

"We'd like there to be more ways for users to get more comfortable and have more experience with the solution to make it easier to use."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"The pricing is okay."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"The license model is based on consumption."

"I used the free trial."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."