Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

Seqrite and Sophos are both solutions in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category. Seqrite is ranked #15, while Sophos is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. Seqrite holds a 0.6% mindshare in UTMU, compared to Sophos’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Sophos users are willing to recommend the solution.

Seqrite UTM

Read 1 Seqrite UTM review

213 Views
211 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Read 86 Sophos Cyberoam UTM reviews

1,706 Views
768 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Seqrite UTM

Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Seqrite UTM and Sophos Cyberoam UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM).

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Threat Management (UTM) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Seqrite UTM

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Seqrite UTM is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Threat Management (UTM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sophos Cyberoam UTM	1.4%
Seqrite UTM	0.6%
Other	98.0%

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

Featured Reviews

Arvind -Kumar

Head IT at NorthSYS Integrators

Discontinuation of Hardware and limited firewalling capabilities

Overall, I would rate the solution a four out of ten. For UTM, I will not suggest Seqrite. But for EPS and antivirus, it is good. Cost-wise also and some features. The features wise also, it is good. And support is also good. We can get support on WhatsApp. So support-wise, it is also good.

Read full review

Stu Harris

Managing Consultant at Affordable IT

Reliable security features have effectively protected against breaches and promote scalable network management

The methodology of the rule sets is perhaps one of the plus points. I think everybody else does it, but the way the rule sets are configured makes it an easily understandable way to manage. One of my presentations demonstrates appropriate and affordable, comprehensive threat protection with centralized management and improved network security. This describes how firewall and VPN functionalities of this product benefit my organization. Protection and identity based security are probably the major selling points, with logging and centralized management. It allows you to identify issues first, and the reporting facilities are there and can be automated. You've got automated reporting that you can set appropriate levels of reporting to management and to the operational team, so they are alerted to what's going on. This describes how Sophos Cyberoam UTM's reporting capability helps in managing our network effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has an MDM solution."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The product, itself, doesn't seem to have any bugs or glitches."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a very strong product with good support."

"In terms of features and user-friendliness, the solution is good. It’s very stable. The solution is scalable. In Sophos Cyberoam UTM, the most valuable features are web and application filtering, routing functionalities, and VPN. It has helped us manage the bandwidth."

"The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."

"The product has helped control bandwidth utilization, as well as enhanced connectivity and security to remote locations."

"Web Filtering and Application Filtering saves a lot of my bandwidth and improves the user's productivity."

"The solution is easy to integrate."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM pros

Cons

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The setup is a bit complex, so we needed help from a consultant."

"Cyberoam configuration is done through the browser, which is one of the places that viruses spread."

"There are some issues with logs and report limitations."

"Sophos VPN connectivity could be improved, as it can be lengthy, and users take longer to connect"

"The policy is a bit too vague."

"Sometimes, users are timed out intermittently."

"On-box sandstorm should be available. As of now, it is from their cloud."

"The reporting should be improved as well as the backup."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The prices of the product can be considered quite steep...My company makes yearly payments towards the licensing cost attached to the product to our ISP."

"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."

"It is very reasonably priced as compared to other solutions in the market."

"I am not happy with the pricing, it could be better."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a cost-efficient solution compared to other solutions."

"There is a license for this solution and it is priced competitively. We paid approximately $2,000 for the license."

"I rate Cyberoam's pricing a five or six out of ten since it is affordable."

"The licensing is on an annual basis and is very reasonably priced."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Marketing Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	29
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

The solution works perfectly without any users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

The price is appropriate, but if you want the real truth, it's actually quite expensive. The annual software licensing is reasonably pricey, with probably about four years' license annual.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

As for areas where Sophos Cyberoam UTM can be improved, it's hard to say; I have not at the moment seen anything that I could not get a solution for, but if there's anything, I'll make sure to rais...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos UTM vs Seqrite UTM

Compared 58% of the time

More Seqrite UTM Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 14% of the time

OPNsense vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall NSa vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Firewall vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 6% of the time

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

February 2026

Download Seqrite UTM product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Cyberoam UTM

January 2026

Download Sophos Cyberoam UTM product report

Also Known As

Seqrite Unified Threat Management, Seqrite TERMINATOR, Seqrite TERMINATOR UTM, TERMINATOR UTM

No data available

Overview

A one-stop solution for all enterprise security needs. With the UTM appliance as your first line of defense, your network is secure and your employees can focus solely on productivity and business impact.

Seqrite

Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.

Sophos

Sample Customers

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council

Buyer's Guide

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.