Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Seqrite UTM
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sophos Cyberoam UTM
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Seqrite UTM is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is 1.4%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Sep 1, 2023
Discontinuation of Hardware and limited firewalling capabilities
It has an MDM solution. Another good feature the solution offers is to secure data to avoid breaches.  Seqrite UTM is not good in fireballing solutions. They are good in EPS endpoint security and antivirus. And load antivirus. Moreover, this solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got…
Kiarash Heydari - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2023
Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy
Sophos Cyberoam UTM has room for improvement in specific rules-based objects and redesign. The solution also needs to improve in adding rules and policies, including renewing and finding policies. The Sophos team should make Sophos Cyberoam UTM policies and rules better and more useful than the old ones because that can be difficult and confusing sometimes. For example, adding policies or rules can be confusing, and that can be risky. To improve Sophos Cyberoam UTM, Sophos should add an IPS or IDS signature feature in the current plans offered to customers. Upgrading or patching the solution can be slow, so that's another area for improvement. In the next version of Sophos Cyberoam UTM, I want it to have an appliance management feature, similar to what's in FortiManager, where you can connect all appliances and manage the devices because that would be easier in terms of reporting.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has an MDM solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a very strong product with good support."
"The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."
"The security capabilities are okay."
"In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features."
"The port forwarding is good."
"The most valuable feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the SD-WAN gateway."
"I'm more inclined towards the conventional firewall. So for me, I'm more geared towards the standard firewall type functionalities as well as the web application firewall because that seems to work fine."
"The product's most valuable features include comprehensive bandwidth management and secure end-to-end VPN connections."
 

Cons

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."
"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."
"The product fails to provide proper reports, making it an area where improvements are required."
"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."
"The data support response time should be improved."
"The product had a hang issue. We needed to reboot, recreate the image, and reconfigure the previous image because the product hanged frequently."
"The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections."
"The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features."
"The product needs to improve its pricing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the least expensive, I rate the solution a five."
"Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription."
"We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support."
"It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands."
"It is more expensive than cheap routers, but it offers a lot of functionality, and that warrants the price."
"I have no comment about the pricing."
"It is worth the value."
"The licensing is on an annual basis and is very reasonably priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Media Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite UTM?
It is a very cheap solution. The licensing model is on a yearly basis. It is a three-year licensing model.
What needs improvement with Seqrite UTM?
Seqrite UTM is not good in fireballing solutions. They are good in EPS endpoint security and antivirus. And load antivirus. Moreover, this solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got stuc...
What do you like most about Sophos Cyberoam UTM?
The solution works perfectly without any users.
What needs improvement with Sophos Cyberoam UTM?
They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance.
 

Also Known As

Seqrite Unified Threat Management, Seqrite TERMINATOR, Seqrite TERMINATOR UTM, TERMINATOR UTM
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries
Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Software Technologies, Cisco, Sophos and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.