Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"The virtual Cyberoam has allowed us to segment our cloud customers via a virtual firewall instance per customer as a second level of security behind our primary systems firewalls."

"It has also increased productivity within the organization because now, fewer people are spending time abusing the network, and are focusing more on their jobs."

"We used to use Fortinet UTM, but Cyberoam is much better in terms of virus scanning, web filtering and spam filtering."

"It has made internet usage more productive for internal users."

"The most valuable feature of this product is the threat protection."

"The most valuable feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the SD-WAN gateway."

"Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas."

"Its portal is user-friendly. I am able to manage the user data and access control through this device."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The dashboard could be improved."

"Its costs are high."

"There needs to be more documentation that users can access to help them understand the solution or troubleshoot as necessary."

"The initial setup is complex and requires the presence of an expert."

"They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance."

"I have problems with the email filtering. Emails pass through without any filtering affecting them. When I get back to them and tell them this is the issue, they check everything and say it is not in their database signature and they have to update it. But you know, by that time, my user has already opened it."

"Performance is a legitimate concern under high traffic conditions."

"Once in a while, an unwanted email will slip in. You have to set your parameters to avoid that happening, but once in a while, an email has slipped past firewall. Once you update the firmware, you notice that it doesn't happen. If an email slips in, I get a little bit worried. I do get the report, but you just don't want that situation happening in the first place."

"It is a cheap firewall. We are not paying for any license."

"We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support."

"Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually."

"The solution comes with a yearly licensing fee."

"We pay for licensing the solution. It's my understanding that it is not overly expensive. It may be somewhere around $2,000 for a license."

"The pricing for this product is good. Its pricing is very low, enticing small businesses to purchase it over its competitors."

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco."

"Although it's not a very cheap solution, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is in a good price range considering its feature set."