No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seqrite UTM
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sophos Cyberoam UTM
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Seqrite UTM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is 3.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Unified Threat Management (UTM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sophos Cyberoam UTM3.7%
Seqrite UTM0.9%
Other95.4%
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Head IT at NorthSYS Integrators
Discontinuation of Hardware and limited firewalling capabilities
Overall, I would rate the solution a four out of ten. For UTM, I will not suggest Seqrite. But for EPS and antivirus, it is good. Cost-wise also and some features. The features wise also, it is good. And support is also good. We can get support on WhatsApp. So support-wise, it is also good.
Olubosola Olusanya - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technology Officer at Super Digital Highways Ltd
Unified security has simplified multi-appliance work but still needs more architectural flexibility
There is room for improvement when it comes to their features and architectures they're trying to implement that they can't directly help with. But by and large, it's actually relatively good. More flexibility would make Sophos Cyberoam UTM better. The platform is not entirely flexible as it is. For example, with Cisco ASA and Firepower, you have the command line that can give you more flexibility in terms of the kind of architectures that you can put them in. But for Sophos Cyberoam UTM, you don't really have that access that can give you those network flexibilities that would allow you to do some other types of architectures.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has an MDM solution."
"Our experience with this product so far has been wonderful."
"User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The competitive advantages of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the unified platform."
"It is very easy to use, we found it simple to deploy, and the solution has been stable over the years."
"Customer Service: It's one of the best."
"The tool's robust features allow for the customization of policies, objects, and firewall settings."
"The user interface is well laid out and understandable."
 

Cons

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."
"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."
"The reports need to be more detailed and granular."
"Policy configuration and implementation is a bit lengthy process."
"Sophos VPN connectivity could be improved, as it can be lengthy, and users take longer to connect"
"The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections."
"The setup is a bit complex, so we needed help from a consultant."
"SD-WAN should be included in the tool."
"Sales and support. The sales team is constantly being changed and after acquisition by Sophos, it was treated as a stepchild until they announced the end-of-life cycle with a path to Sophos XG product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution’s pricing is average. The product is worth the money."
"Separate license keys are required for different solutions that we implement in the server room, which are an additional cost."
"It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands."
"Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription."
"Licensing is very good value for the money."
"The licensing is on an annual basis and is very reasonably priced."
"We just use the standard package."
"The product has a very low price compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business49
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Cyberoam UTM?
The price is appropriate, but if you want the real truth, it's actually quite expensive. The annual software licensing is reasonably pricey, with probably about four years' license annual.
What needs improvement with Sophos Cyberoam UTM?
Sophos Firewall could go beyond configuration health checks and introduce continuous, intelligent firewall policy governance. The firewall should automatically identify redundant, shadowed, unused,...
What is your primary use case for Sophos Cyberoam UTM?
I do work with clients that use both Cisco and Sophos products. My work is mostly with firewalls, storages, switches, and routers.
 

Also Known As

Seqrite Unified Threat Management, Seqrite TERMINATOR, Seqrite TERMINATOR UTM, TERMINATOR UTM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries
Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: October 2026.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.