Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"Web application filtering eases internet access control."

"The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required."

"We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that."

"It has been working fine. You just turn it on, and it works."

"The features that I find most valuable in Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the RED, the Sophos RED, which is the SD-WAN, a very welcome feature that has made us fully transition out of the paid MPLS to SD-WANs."

"I'm more inclined towards the conventional firewall. So for me, I'm more geared towards the standard firewall type functionalities as well as the web application firewall because that seems to work fine."

"The VPN is the most usable feature."

"The product has helped control bandwidth utilization, as well as enhanced connectivity and security to remote locations."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."

"Smaller CR15 units don’t have a hard disc or built in IView software. These units could do with that feature."

"The solution had a feature to import users from a CSV file. However, the latest version does not have that option."

"Cyberoam UTM needs to have more certifications with third-parties, such as NSS Labs."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM could improve by adding VPN site-to-site capabilities. The correct version does not work with Microsoft Azure Cloud."

"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."

"Regarding the documentation, I find that it is still lacking, although the YouTube videos, user training, and knowledge forum are now better than they were before."

"While the security features are excellent, they could be improved."

"There are many options for payment of the subscription license. You purchase a subscription every one, two, or three years. You can also have monthly subscriptions but we typically offer subscriptions for three years because from the financial perspective it is better to have a three-year subscription."

"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco."

"We just use the standard package."

"The solution’s pricing is average. The product is worth the money."

"Although it's not a very cheap solution, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is in a good price range considering its feature set."

"The product’s pricing is expensive."

"It is not cheap."