Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ThousandEyes comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor's customer service is well-regarded for effectiveness, with ratings averaging 7-8 out of 10.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.9
SolarWinds needs improved integrations, security, user-friendliness, pricing, setup, and features like mobile access, AI, mapping, and support.
No sentiment score available
There is no AI integration, which would be beneficial for baseline monitoring and alerting on behavioral deviations.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is scalable, efficiently managing users and devices, with high ratings and potential for expansion.
No sentiment score available
For large scalability, considering a SaaS offering in a cloud would be more scalable compared to on-premises deployment.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is considered costly with varied licensing, reaching up to $80,000, despite minimal deployment manpower.
No sentiment score available
The more devices you add, the more expensive the licenses become.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is reliable and stable, with minor resource concerns, improved performance, and few crashes when configured correctly.
No sentiment score available
For larger environments, ensuring the system is correctly sized at the start is essential to avoid stability problems.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offers precise monitoring, customizable alerts, and user-friendly tools for efficient network issue resolution and troubleshooting.
No sentiment score available
It is also beneficial for near real-time monitoring, letting us know if something is not right.
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
58th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Network Device M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
37th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThousandEyes
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThousandEyes is 4.3%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a single dashboard, but is expensive
We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature.  The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.  Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…
GurinderSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful and affordable tool designed to help you achieve comprehensive monitoring
It would be beneficial if SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could provide a feature to monitor CRC errors specifically on individual interfaces rather than the entire device. This would help in detecting intermittent issues and packet drops on main links more accurately, especially when there are CRC errors. It's important for us to be aware of these issues to avoid any voice quality problems or interruptions on our MTS links.
Satyavrat Nirala - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers user monitoring and Internet insights and include customer journeys
It’s evolving; I feel it needs more holistic integration. It needs more improvement. It’s very good, but the integration can be slightly complicated on different platforms. I used it for a healthcare organization, and the integration was slightly challenging. In future releases, I would like to explore AI capabilities. AI would be more valuable because it works across different cloud and server systems. It looks into issue detection and insight modeling, so that is something I feel will be very helpful in the near future. More AI because of compliance and other challenges, not because of the product challenge. It’s about regulations, and we have HIPAA laws in the US and many different kinds of laws. Because of that, these specific elements and certain units don’t allow the tooling system to be fully utilized. We also support a certain segment of healthcare, which is the army healthcare segment, which is more government-controlled. There are certain restrictions in moving into the cloud. That’s where I thought those elements might need some more improvement. Also, looking into how we’ll be able to use more data visualization. It has it, but it doesn’t give you everything. If you look into the elements of use and so many other elements are there, but the UI/UX also has to be improved a bit, I feel. From a developer’s standpoint, it’s very easy, but from a consultant’s standpoint, there can be more enhancement, like one-click view and one-click report generation. Those things should be more seamless.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What do you like most about SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?
I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase a...
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?
It should provide user-friendly pages and device environment. When adding devices, you can view devices easily in a l...
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others...
What needs improvement with ThousandEyes?
When I first started using ThousandEyes, I found it challenging to extract useful information due to the numerous opt...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Network Device Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Air Rarotonga
Wayfair, GitHub, Craigslist, Comcast, SurveyMonkey, Lyft, Box, HP, Zendesk, IO Data Centers, Good Technology, NNTCommunications, Proofpoint, Schneider, Crowdstrike, Avera, Pitney Bowes, InstartLogic, Shutterfly, Shutterstock, Condé Nast, Roche, Jive, Actelion, Brocade, Infor, Okta, JLL, DigitalOcean, Zuora, NetSuite, CloudFlare, One, DemonWare, Quantcast, Carbonite, CareerBuilder, Prosper, Oscar, Slack
Find out what your peers are saying about SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs. ThousandEyes and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.