We performed a comparison between Sophos EPP Suite and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The stability is very good."
"The web control and the application control are two good features."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the security and scanning of streaming media. Additionally, the solution is simple uninstall."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the detection capability, machine learning, ransomware protection, and live response."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the synchronized threat and ransomware protection."
"The most valuable feature is the central administration and management."
"The most valuable feature of Sophos EPP Suite is the accounting and reporting services are good and professional. The business features of the solution are very useful, such as the reporting page for clients. It provides a clear understanding of usage, including how much traffic has been used and how much is remaining. Additionally, it's user-friendly and easy to understand. Overall, the solution is good, useful, and has a helpful user interface."
"It's easy to deploy."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"The new central console is better than the earlier one."
"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"Detections could be improved."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"There could be enhancements made to the DLP."
"Lacks delegated administration privileges for large organizations, and differential permissions for admins."
"In terms of improvement, the main challenge is setting up VPN connections."
"The solution needs to perform better or update its anti-ransomware and anti-malware engines to keep up with the latest hacking techniques."
"With Sophos EPP Suite, inventory cannot be checked, and external applications cannot be installed."
"There could be more integration included in Sophos EPP Suite."
"The solution could improve on the resource management, it is a bit heavy on the resources."
"We need to uninstall the license to move to another endpoint."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"We experienced some bad behavior when we first installed the product. The system also starts slowly in some instances. If for some reason this solution crashes, we could lose all our data."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
"On the next release, they should build an easier way to see a repair option within the McAfee icon on your system tray. If there was an issue, you should be able to contact the user or just right-click on "repair". That would be a very good feature to add. That could be a place of improvement, just adding that button, or customizing it."
"There are two main areas that require improvement. One is the size of the packages. Although I'll admit manageability is good, if I want to deploy, let's say just the antivirus or just the firewall, each of those package sizes are quite large. They are sometimes as big as 200MB or 250MB. When I have operations in remote areas where connectivity is always poor, it's difficult. To deploy such a package in a remote location over the internet or something like that is always challenging."
"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."
"The solution's technical support should be improved since we faced a lot of issues with the support. There were some delays in responses from the technical support."
Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 55 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trend Micro Deep Security, Coro, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our Sophos EPP Suite vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.