We performed a comparison between enable.sc and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc has a user-friendly interface and fewer false positives, while Trend Micro Cloud One has good workload management and technical control. Tenable.sc excels in accurate detection, prioritization, and automation, while Trend Micro Cloud One provides excellent virtual patching, login inspection, and container security. Tenable.sc needs to improve its penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, vendor training, and accuracy of vulnerability assessments. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs to enhance its pricing, automation, robustness, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service has received mixed feedback, with users reporting delays and unhelpful information. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has received largely positive reviews for their customer service, with customers praising the responsiveness and knowledge of the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a simple and uncomplicated initial setup process, which can be completed quickly in just one day. In contrast, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup is more complex and can take anywhere from several hours to a month, depending on the technical expertise and environmental complexity involved. Furthermore, Cloud One necessitates daily monitoring for vulnerabilities and problems.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses and has additional costs for advanced support, while some find it reasonable and others consider it expensive. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the middle range and they offer additional services for a better infrastructure picture. The price has decreased by 25% in recent years.
ROI: Tenable.sc offers cost savings by reducing the need for additional manpower, ensuring a positive return on investment. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is known for its versatility and seamless integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One for vulnerability scanning and reporting, according to user reviews. Tenable.sc offers more sophisticated scanning capabilities, timely updates, and fewer false positives than its competitors. While Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its virtual patching and login inspection features, users have reported high pricing, complex initial setup, and inadequate marketing documentation.
"Tenable's most valuable features are the credential scan, vulnerability reports, and vulnerability ratings (VPR)."
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The stability is quite good."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."
"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."
"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."
"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The pricing can get high."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Security Center is ranked 11th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. See our Tenable Security Center vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
