Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Tenable Security Center vs Trend Vision One - Cloud Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
17th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (1st)
Tenable Security Center
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (10th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (3rd)
Trend Vision One - Cloud Se...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (16th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (9th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (13th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (9th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (3rd), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 3.5%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tenable Security Center3.5%
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security1.0%
Zafran Security1.1%
Other94.4%
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini - PeerSpot reviewer
Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions
I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.
OndrejKOVAC - PeerSpot reviewer
Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights
Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.
Troy Riegsecker - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves our traffic visibility, saves us time, and identifies blind spots
The biggest problem was that I couldn't see our East-West network traffic between our endpoints. However, I could see North-South traffic, meaning anything that went up to the firewall and back. This meant if, for example, a coworker and I were sending something malicious to each other, I wouldn't be able to see it or tell where it was coming from. I might get an alert saying suspicious activity was detected, but wouldn't have specific details. Implementing an XDR system changed this. Now, I can see all East-West traffic and set up rules for specific actions if certain events occur. I can also filter the information to focus on what's most important. Every day, I review XDR alerts, investigate them, and determine if they're suspicious or not. We use Trend Vision One - Cloud Security across all our endpoints, including PCs, laptops, and servers. The coverage it provides is extremely important. We leverage Trend Vision's XDR capabilities for enhanced threat detection and response. Additionally, we utilize the Trend Vision One - Cloud Security app security solution. We have Trend Vision One - Cloud Security as a service, and I also manage TippingPoint. Our cybersecurity posture is significantly stronger than it was four years ago. Back then, we were hit by a ransomware attack, which exposed vulnerabilities in our security measures. We were only spending around eight thousand dollars annually on cybersecurity, and as the company grew rapidly, investments in cybersecurity weren't prioritized. While achieving absolute security is impossible, we are demonstrably more secure than ever before. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security provides centralized visibility. Every day, I log into Vision One and the first thing I check is my risk score. Based on my score, I take action. For example, if my score jumps from 36 to 50, I investigate the change in Vision One. Vision One tells me what caused the increase and offers specific recommendations. I can then easily see what actions will reduce my risk. For example, I might see that fixing a specific vulnerability will lower my score by six points, but another fix won't help. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is a powerful tool, and that's just a glimpse of its capabilities. It shows me my OS vulnerabilities, application vulnerabilities, and even critical business exposures. For example, it might alert me to an Adobe CBE and tell me which devices are affected. This allows me to quickly identify and patch vulnerable devices. Furthermore, I can directly initiate patching from Vision One. Additionally, I can use integrated products like Container Security for AWS to gain comprehensive security insights across different environments, all within the same platform. Every day, I start by logging into the Executive Dashboard. It's the first thing I check, as it provides me with my risk index and a summary of potential issues. Furthermore, I can view information about our devices, risk levels, and other relevant data points. After reviewing the Executive Dashboard, I transition to the Operations Dashboard for a more granular look at individual devices and their associated risks. Before XDR, I could spend hours trying to track down the issue behind an alert. Now, everything is at my fingertips within Vision One. I simply click on the link, and it gives me all the information I need: who the user is, the PC name, and relevant context depending on the alert type e.g., a suspicious email. So, instead of spending hours figuring out the source of the alert, I can now resolve it in just a couple of minutes. With the managed XDR service, I have peace of mind knowing that if they find something suspicious, they will alert me immediately. They can even call me and say, "Hey, we found some unusual activity and stopped it. Do you want us to continue investigating or revert to the previous state?" I can then confidently say yes and trust that they are handling the situation effectively. I've received calls in the past late at night about suspicious activity, and I'm grateful that I don't have to be the one monitoring everything 24/7. Now, I have a team of experts who do it for me, providing a significant advantage over-relying on a single person. They only alert me when something serious arises, allowing me to focus on other matters. The managed XDR service has freed up our team's time by eliminating the need for 24/7 on-call duty with Vision One. This allows us to focus on other tasks instead of spending hours diagnosing potential issues. Now, we're able to resolve concerns in minutes, freeing up additional time for projects and other responsibilities. While I find the Attack Surface Risk Management module to be a valuable addition to the executive dashboard, I don't utilize the Attack Surface Discovery feature as frequently, maybe once a week. This is primarily because I rely on the XDR management system to monitor for potential threats and alert me to anything critical. Manually reviewing the detailed discovery overview doesn't add significant value at present, as I trust the XDR system to flag any urgent issues. The Attack Surface Risk Management module helps to identify blind spots in our environment, especially where assets are highly exposed. It presents explainable CDZs and provides a rich asset score for each PC or device. This allows me to easily identify high-risk devices and investigate further. For example, when I saw a server with a suspicious file flagged as a 96 high-risk alert, I could investigate and find that it was an Excel file with a macro, explaining the risk. I can then determine if it's a false positive and communicate this appropriately. The module's continuous learning ensures improved accuracy over time. Implementing the managed XDR has significantly reduced our time to detect and respond to threats. Previously, I received security alerts via email, which could be delayed. Additionally, I often needed to manually review logs and scan results, which was time-consuming and inefficient. Now, the managed XDR provides timely alerts directly in the platform, streamlining my workflow and keeping me informed promptly. This has saved me one to two hours per day. Implementing a managed XDR solution has significantly reduced the number of false positives I encounter. This allows me to identify and address real issues much faster. Instead of spending 45 minutes tracking down potential threats, I can now simply click a link and determine if an alert is legitimate within three minutes. We use playbooks that have certain rules and are set up to automatically take action when they find something suspicious. This way, I don't have to sit there and make judgment calls every single day. If a certain event occurs, or if we discover something unexpected, I can create a playbook to automatically start looking for it everywhere on the network.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."
"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."
"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."
"Zafran is an excellent tool."
"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."
"The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping."
"Feature-wise, Tenable Security Center is a very fast tool with many dashboards and reports, and it covers all our systems."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The valauble feature is compliance reporting system."
"Tenable's most valuable features are the credential scan, vulnerability reports, and vulnerability ratings (VPR)."
"We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's most valuable features include its comprehensive dashboard, which provides a clear overview of all services and systems, confirming their installation location and update status."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"Trend Vision One stands out for its stability and reliability compared to its competitors."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
 

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."
"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."
"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."
"The solution is expensive."
"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."
"Support could be faster."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"The solution should provide better web application features and support."
"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."
"Tenable SC can improve by making it easier to create complicated reports and have more effectiveness in the remediation area for comparison between the scans."
"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"While it provides some data protection within its security framework, it doesn't allow users to customize policies or create their own for specific needs."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."
"This solution's price is quite high."
"My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs. The pricing of the solution falls in the mid-range level, so it is not too expensive"
"We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."
"The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."
"We're able to save because we don't have to employ more staff members to help wit ht he scheduling of the scans, running the reports or sending them out to the systems owners. That alone is a big ROI for us."
"We're happy with the licensing cost and find it affordable."
"Tenable is open-source."
"It's a slightly expensive product."
"The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good."
"Pricing for Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security in the corporate market is okay."
"Two years ago, it cost $200 for 20 credits, which was a high cost."
"The price could be lower. That is a bit of a consideration."
"One year ago, Trend transitioned to a credit system for licensing, which has confused users."
"The pricing for Cloud One is reasonable because my costs scale up and down based on my infrastructure usage."
"The Trend Vision One pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?
Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...
What needs improvement with Zafran Security?
In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...
What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?
My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...
What do you like most about Tenable SC?
The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?
The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.
What needs improvement with Tenable SC?
The reason for rating it an eight out of ten is that the initial setup could be easier; the setup is rather difficult...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security?
Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft...
What needs improvement with Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security?
Currently, we must procure and configure the server hardware independently, as we obtain the software separately from...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
Trend Micro Cloud One , Cloud One Workload Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Application Security, Cloud One File Storage Security, Cloud One Network Security, Cloud One Conformity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Security Center vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.