Datadog Reviews

We are using Datadog to improve our cloud monitoring and observability across our enterprise apps.  We have integrated a lot of different resources into Datadog, like Kubernetes, App Gateways, App Service Environments, App Service Plans, and other Web App resources. 

I will be using the monitoring and observability features of Datadog. Dashboards are used very heavily by teams and SREs. We really have seen that Datadog has already improved both our monitoring and our observability.

The ease and speed of which you can create a dashboard has been a huge improvement.  

The different types of monitors we can create have been huge, too. We can do so many different things with monitors that we couldn't do before with our alerts. 

Being able to click on a trace or log and drill down on it to see what happened has been great.  

Some have found the learning curve a bit steep. That said,they are coming around slowly. There is just a lot of information to learn how to navigate.

The different types of monitors have been very valuable. We have been able to make our alerts (monitors) more actionable than we were able to previously.  

Watchdog is a favorite feature among a lot of the devs. It catches things they didn't even know were an issue. 

RUM is another feature a lot of us are looking forward to seeing how it can help us improve our customer experience during tax season.  

We hope to enable the code review feature at some point to so we can see what code caused the issue.

I would like to see the integration between PagerDuty and Datadog improved.  The tags in Datadog don't match those in PagerDuty, and we have to make it work.  Also, I would like to see if the ability to replicate a KQL query in Datadog is made easier or better.  

I would like to see the alert communications to email or phones made better so we could hopefully move off PagerDuty and just use Datadog for that. 

There are also a lot of features that we haven't budgeted for yet and I would like for us to be able to use them in the future.

I've used the solution for about two years.

Our primary use case for this solution is comprehensive cloud monitoring across our entire infrastructure and application stack. 

We operate in a multi-cloud environment, utilizing services from AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. 

Our applications are predominantly containerized and run on Kubernetes clusters. We have a microservices architecture with dozens of services communicating via REST APIs and message queues. 

The solution helps us monitor the performance, availability, and resource utilization of our cloud resources, databases, application servers, and front-end applications. 

It's essential for maintaining high availability, optimizing costs, and ensuring a smooth user experience for our global customer base. We particularly rely on it for real-time monitoring, alerting, and troubleshooting of production issues.

Datadog has significantly improved our organization by providing us with great visibility across the entire application stack. This enhanced observability has allowed us to detect and resolve issues faster, often before they impact our end-users. 

The unified platform has streamlined our monitoring processes, replacing several disparate tools we previously used. This consolidation has improved team collaboration and reduced context-switching for our DevOps engineers. 

The customizable dashboards have made it easier to share relevant metrics with different stakeholders, from developers to C-level executives. We've seen a marked decrease in our mean time to resolution (MTTR) for incidents, and the historical data has been invaluable for capacity planning and performance optimization. 

Additionally, the AI-driven insights have helped us proactively identify potential issues and optimize our infrastructure costs.

We've found the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) feature to be the most valuable, as it provides great visibility on trace-level data. This granular insight allows us to pinpoint performance bottlenecks and optimize our code more effectively. 

The distributed tracing capability has been particularly useful in our microservices environment, helping us understand the flow of requests across different services and identify latency issues. 

Additionally, the log management and analytics features have greatly improved our ability to troubleshoot issues by correlating logs with metrics and traces. 

The infrastructure monitoring capabilities, especially for our Kubernetes clusters, have helped us optimize resource allocation and reduce costs.

While Datadog is an excellent monitoring solution, it could be improved by building more features to replace alerting apps like OpsGenie and PagerDuty. Specifically, we'd like to see more advanced incident management capabilities integrated directly into the platform. This could include features like sophisticated on-call scheduling, escalation policies, and incident response workflows. 

Additionally, we'd appreciate more customizable machine learning-driven anomaly detection to help us identify unusual patterns more accurately. Improved support for serverless architectures, particularly for monitoring and tracing AWS Lambda functions, would be beneficial. 

Enhanced security monitoring and threat detection capabilities would also be valuable, potentially reducing our reliance on separate security information and event management (SIEM) tools.

I've used the solution for two years.

We use the solution to monitor and investigate issues with production services at work. We're periodically reviewing the service catalog view for the various applications and I use it to identify any anomalies with service metrics, any changes in user behavior evident via API calls, and/or spikes in errors.  

We use monitors to trigger alerts for on-call engineers to act upon. The monitors have set thresholds for request latency, error rates, and throughput. 

We also use automated rules to block bad actors based on request volume or patterns.

Datadog has made setting up monitors easier, more reliable, and more transparent. This has helped standardize our on-call process and set all of our on-call engineers up for success.  

It has also standardized the way we evaluate issues with our applications by encouraging all teams to use the service catalog.  

It makes it easier for our platforms and QA teams to get other engineering teams up to speed with managing their own applications' performance. 

Overall, Datadog has been very helpful for us.

The service catalog view is very helpful for periodic reviews of our application. It has also standardized the way we evaluate issues with our applications.  Having one page with an easy-to-scan view of app metrics, error patterns, package vulnerabilities, etc., is very helpful and reduces friction for our full-stack engineers.

Monitors have also been very valuable when setting up our on-call processes. It makes it easy to set up and adjust alerting to keep our teams aware of anything going wrong.

Datadog is great overall. One thing to improve would be making it easier to see common patterns across traces. I sometimes end up in a trace but have a hard time finding other common features about the error/requests that are similar to that trace. This could be easier to get to; however, in that case, it's actually an education issue.  

Another thing that could be improved is the service list page sometimes refreshes slowly, and I accidentally click the wrong environment since the sort changes late.

I've used the solution for about a year.

It is very stable. I have not seen any issues with Datadog.

It seems very scalable.

I've had no specific experience with technical support.

Neutral

We used Honeycomb before. We switched since Datadog offered more tooling.

Each application has been easy to instrument.

We implemented the solution in-house.

Engineers save an unquantifiable amount of time by having one standard view for all applications and monitors.

I am not exposed to this aspect of Datadog.

We did not evaluate other options. 

We use the solution to monitor production service uptime/downtime, latency, and log storage. 

Our entire monitoring infrastructure runs off Datadog, so all our alarms are configured with it. We also use it for tracing API performance; what are the biggest regression points. 

Finally we use it to compare performance on SEO metrics vs competitors. This is a primary use case as SEO dictates our position from google traffic which is a large portion of our customer view generation so it is a vital part of the business we rely on datadog for.

The product improved the organization primarily by providing consistent data with virtually zero downtime. This was a problem we had with an old provider. It also made it easy to transition an otherwise massive migration involving hundreds of alarms. 

The training provided was crucial, along with having a dedicated team that can forward our requests to and from Datadog efficiently. Without that, we may have never transitioned to Datadog in the first place since it is always hard to lead a migration for an entire company.

The API tracing has been massive for debugging latency regressions and how to improve the performance of our least performant APIs. Through tracing, we managed to find the slowest step of an API, improve its latency, and iterate on the process until we had our desired timings. This is important for improving our SEO as LCP, INP are directly taking from the numbers we see on Datadog for our API timings. 

The ease of dashboard creation and alarm monitoring has helped us not only stay competitive but be industry leaders in performance.

The product can be improved by allowing the grouping of APIs to add variables. That way, any API with a unique ID could be grouped together. 

Furthermore, SEO monitoring has been crucial for us but also a difficult part to set up as comparing alarms between us and competitors is a tough feat. Data is not always consistent so we have been toying and experimenting with removing the noise of datadog but its been taking a while. 

Finally, Datadog should have a feature that reports stale alarms based on activity.

I've used the solution for six months.

Its very stable and we have not experienced an issue with downtime on Datadog.

Datadog works well for scalability as volume has not seemed to slow.

We haven't talked to the support team. 

Positive

We switched to Datadog as we used to have a provider that had very inconsistent logging. Our alarms would often not fire since our services were not working since the provider had a logging problem.

The initial setup was somewhat complex due to the built-in monitoring with services. This is not always super comprehensive and has to be studied as opposed to other metrics platforms that just service all your endpoints, which you can trace them with Grafana.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team.

The ROI is good.

Users must try to understand the way Datadog alarms work off the bat so that they can minimize the requirements for expensive features like custom metrics. 

It can sometimes be tempting to use them; however, it is not always necessary as you migrate to Datalog, as they are a provider that treats alarms somewhat differently than you may be used to.

We have evaluated New Relic, Grafana, Splunk, and many more in our quest to find the best monitoring provider.

We use Datadog as our main log ingestion source, and Datadog is one of the first places we go to for analyzing logs. 

This is especially true for cases of debugging, monitoring, and alerting on errors and incidents, as we use traffic logs from K8s, Amazon Web Services, and many other services at our company to Datadog. In addition, many products and teams at our company have dashboards for monitoring statistics (sometimes based on these logs directly, other times we set queries for these metrics) to alert us if there are any errors or health issues.

Overall, at my company, Datadog has made it easy to search for and look up logs at an impressively quick search rate over a large amount of logs. 

It seamlessly allows you to set up monitoring and alerting directly from log queries which is convenient and helps for a good user experience, and while there is a bit of a learning curve, given enough time a majority of my company now uses Datadog as the first place to check when there are errors or bugs. 

However, the cost aspect of Datadog is tricky to gauge because it's related to usage, and thus, it is hard to tell the relative value of Datadog year to year.

The feature I've found most valuable is the log search feature. It's set up with our ingestion to be a quick one-stop shop, is reliable and quick, and seamlessly integrates into building custom monitors and alerts based on log volume and timeframes. 

As a result, it's easy to leverage this to triage bugs and errors, since we can pinpoint the logs around the time that they occur and get metadata/context around the issue. This is the main feature that I use the most in my workflow with Datadog to help debug and triage issues.

More helpful log search keywords/tips would be helpful in improving Datadog's log dashboard. I recently struggled a lot to parse text from raw line logs that didn't seem to match directly with facets. There should be smart searching capabilities. However, it's not intuitive to learn how to leverage them, and instead had to resort to a Python script to do some simple regex parsing (I was trying to parse "file:folder/*/*" from the logs and yet didn't seem to be able to do this in Datadog, maybe I'm just not familiar enough with the logs but didn't seem to easily find resources on how to do this either). 

I've used the solution for 10 months.

Beware that the cost will fluctuate (and it often only gets more expensive very quickly).

Our primary use case is for custom and vendor-supplied web application log aggregation, performance tracing, and alerting. 

We run a mix of AWS EC2, Azure serverless, and colocated VMWare servers to support higher education web applications. We're managing a hybrid multi-cloud solution across hundreds of applications is always a challenge. 

Datadog agents are on each web host, and we have native integrations with GitHub, AWS, and Azure to get all of our instrumentation and error data in one place for easy analysis and monitoring.

Through use of Datadog across all of our apps, we were able to consolidate a number of alerting and error-tracking apps. Datadog ties them all together in cohesive dashboards. Whether the app is vendor supplied or we built it ourselves, the depth of tracing, profiling, and hooking into logs is all obtainable and tunable. Both legacy .NET Framework and Windows Event Viewer and cutting edge .NET Core with streaming logs all work. The breath of coverage for any app type or situation is really incredible. It feels like there's nothing we can't monitor.

When it comes to Datadog, several features have proven particularly valuable. 

The centralized pipeline tracking and error logging provide a comprehensive view of our development and deployment processes, making it much easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. 

Synthetic testing has been a game-changer, allowing us to catch potential problems before they impact real users. 

Real user monitoring gives us invaluable insights into actual user experiences, helping us prioritize improvements where they matter most. And the ability to create custom dashboards has been incredibly useful, allowing us to visualize key metrics and KPIs in a way that makes sense for different teams and stakeholders. 

Together, these features form a powerful toolkit that helps us maintain high performance and reliability across our applications and infrastructure, ultimately leading to better user satisfaction and more efficient operations.

I'd like to see an expansion of the Android and IOS apps to have a simplified CI/CD pipeline history view. 

I like the idea of monitoring on the go, yet it seems the options are still a bit limited out of the box. 

While the documentation is very good considering all the frameworks and technology Datadog covers, there are areas - specifically .NET Profiling and Tracing of IIS hosted apps - that need a lot of focus to pick up on the key details needed. 

In some cases the screenshots don't match the text as updates are made.

I've been using the solution for about three years.

We have been impressed with the uptime. It offers clean and light resource usage of the agents.

The solution scales well and is customizable. 

Customer support is always helpful to help us tune our committed costs and alerting us when we start spending out of the on demand budget.

We used a mix of a custom error email system, SolarWinds, UptimeRobot, and GitHub actions. We switched to find one platform that could give deep app visibility regardless of whether it is Linux or Windows or Container, cloud or on-prem hosted.

The implementation is generally simple. .NET Profiling of IIS and aligning logs to traces and profiles was a challenge.

We implemented the setup in-house. 

We've witnessed significant time saved by the development team assessing bugs and performance issues.

Set up live trials to asses cost scaling. Small decisions around how monitors are used can have big impacts on cost scaling. 

NewRelic was considered. LogicMonitor was chosen over Datadog for our network and campus server management use cases.

We're excited to dig further into the new offerings around LLM and continue to grow our footprint in Datadog. 

Our primary use case is custom and vendor-supplied web application log aggregation, performance tracing and alerting. 

We run a mix of AWS EC2, Azure serverless, and colocated VMWare servers to support higher education web applications. 

Managing a hybrid multi-cloud solution across hundreds of applications is always a challenge. 

Datadog agents on each web host and native integrations with GitHub, AWS, and Azure get all of our instrumentation and error data in one place for easy analysis and monitoring.

Using Datadog across all of our apps, we were able to consolidate a number of alerting and error-tracking apps, and Datadog ties them all together in cohesive dashboards. 

Whether the app is vendor-supplied or we built it ourselves, the depth of tracing, profiling, and hooking into logs is all obtainable and tunable. Both legacy .NET Framework and Windows Event Viewer and cutting-edge .NET Core with streaming logs all work. 

The breadth of coverage for any app type or situation is really incredible. It feels like there's nothing we can't monitor.

When it comes to Datadog, several features have proven particularly valuable. For example, the centralized pipeline tracking and error logging provide a comprehensive view of our development and deployment processes, making it much easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. 

Synthetic testing has been a game-changer, allowing us to catch potential problems before they impact real users. 

Real user monitoring gives us invaluable insights into actual user experiences, helping us prioritize improvements where they matter most. And the ability to create custom dashboards has been incredibly useful, allowing us to visualize key metrics and KPIs in a way that makes sense for different teams and stakeholders. 

Together, these features form a powerful toolkit that helps us maintain high performance and reliability across our applications and infrastructure, ultimately leading to better user satisfaction and more efficient operations.

They need an expansion of the Android and IOS apps to provide a simplified CI/CD pipeline history view. 

I like the idea of monitoring on the go. That said, it seems the options are still a bit limited out of the box. 

While the documentation is very good considering all the frameworks and technology Datadog covers, there are areas - specifically .NET Profiling and Tracing of IIS hosted apps - that need a lot of focus to pick up on the key details needed. 

In some cases the screenshots don't match the text as updates are made. I spent longer than I should figuring out how to correlate logs to traces, mostly related to environmental variables.

I've used the solution for about three years.

We have been impressed with the uptime and clean and light resource usage of the agents.

The solution has been very scalable and very customizable.

Support is always helpful to help us tune our committed costs and alert us when we start spending out of the on-demand budget.

We used a mix of a custom error email system, SolarWinds, UptimeRobot, and GitHub actions. We switched to find one platform that could give deep app visibility regardless of Linux or Windows or Container, cloud or on-prem hosted.

The implementation is generally simple. That said, .NET Profiling of IIS and aligning logs to traces and profiles was a challenge.

The solution was implemented in-house. 

Our ROI has been significant time saved by the development team assessing bugs and performance issues.

Set up live trials to asses cost scaling. Small decisions around how monitors are used can impact cost scaling. 

NewRelic was considered. LogicMonitor was chosen over Datadog for our network and campus server management use cases.

We are excited to explore the new offerings around LLM further and continue to expand our presence in Datadog. 

Our primary use case is custom and vendor-supplied web application log aggregation, performance tracing and alerting. 

We run a mix of AWS EC2, Azure serverless, and colocated VMWare servers to support higher education web applications. 

Managing a hybrid multi-cloud solution across hundreds of applications is always a challenge. Datadog agents on each web host and native integrations with GitHub, AWS, and Azure get all of our instrumentation and error data in one place for easy analysis and monitoring.

Through the use of Datadog across all of our apps, we were able to consolidate a number of alerting and error-tracking apps, and Datadog ties them all together in cohesive dashboards. Whether the app is vendor-supplied or we built it ourselves, the depth of tracing, profiling, and hooking into logs is all obtainable and tunable. Both legacy .NET Framework and Windows Event Viewer and cutting-edge .NET Core with streaming logs all work. The breadth of coverage for any app type or situation is really incredible. It feels like there's nothing we can't monitor.

When it comes to Datadog, several features have proven particularly valuable. 

The centralized pipeline tracking and error logging provide a comprehensive view of our development and deployment processes, making it much easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. 

Synthetic testing has been a game-changer, allowing us to catch potential problems before they impact real users. Real user monitoring gives us invaluable insights into actual user experiences, helping us prioritize improvements where they matter most. And the ability to create custom dashboards has been incredibly useful, allowing us to visualize key metrics and KPIs in a way that makes sense for different teams and stakeholders. 

Together, these features form a powerful toolkit that helps us maintain high performance and reliability across our applications and infrastructure, ultimately leading to better user satisfaction and more efficient operations.

I'd like to see an expansion of the Android and IOS apps to have a simplified CI/CD pipeline history view. I like the idea of monitoring on the go, however, it seems the options are still a bit limited out of the box. 

While the documentation is very good considering all the frameworks and technology Datadog covers, there are areas - specifically .NET Profiling and Tracing of IIS-hosted apps - that need a lot of focus to pick up on the key details needed. In some cases the screenshots don't match the text as updates are made. I feel I spent longer than I should figuring out how to correlate logs to traces, mostly related to environmental variables.

I've used the solution for about three years.

We have been impressed with the uptime and clean and light resource usage of the agents.

The solution was very scalable and very customizable.

Sales service is always helpful in tuning our committed costs and alerting us when we start spending outside the on-demand budget.

We used a mix of a custom error email system, SolarWinds, UptimeRobot, and GitHub actions. We switched to find one platform that could give deep app visibility regardless of Linux, Windows, Container, cloud or on-prem hosted.

The setup is generally simple. That said, .NET Profiling of IIS and aligning logs to traces and profiles was a challenge.

The solution was iImplemented in-house. 

I'd count our ROI as significant time saved by the development team assessing bugs and performance issues.

It's a good idea to set up live trials to asses cost scaling. Small decisions around how monitors are used can have big impacts on cost scaling. 

NewRelic was considered. LogicMonitor was chosen over Datadog for our network and campus server management use cases.

We are excited to dig further into the new offerings around LLM and continue to grow our footprint in Datadog.