Datadog Reviews

We use Datadog for monitoring to get the traces and logs of all our applications. Datadog provides dashboard and alert capabilities to identify if something is wrong with various teams. More than 200 users, mostly software engineers, work with Datadog. 

Datadog provides tracing and logging, whereas Dynatrace focuses on tracing, and Splunk is more of a logging tool. Datadog's advantage is that we don't need two tools. 

Datadog isn't as mature as some of the established players like Dynatrace or Splunk. It's a new product, so they are constantly releasing new features, and I don't have much to complain about.

We have used Datadog for seven months.

We haven't issued any issues so far, so it's a highly stable platform. 

We are a unit within a much larger entity that is using Datadog. It can scale up to meet your needs. 

We have regular calls with the Datadog team. They take feedback and bring in the product managers to quickly answer questions and fix issues. They help you deal with some of the issues you have with any new product, but Datadog is one of the fastest-growing products in the monitoring space.

You don't need to install anything because it's a SaaS product with a web-based UI. They provide you the credentials to give you admin access. You only need to install the agents where you need monitoring. The time required to deploy the agent depends on what you're monitoring, but the solution itself works like Office 365 or any other SaaS product. 

We deploy agents on-premise to collect data on on-premise VM instances. We don't use Datadog in our cloud network. We do have some Cloud apps that we have it on and we also have Containers. We have it on their headquarters, the main software for them is on their own Cloud.

Eventually, we're building out the process now and using it better. We plan to use Datadog for root cause analysis relating to any kinds of issues we have with software, with applications going down, latency issues, connection issues, etc. Eventually, we're going to use Datadog for application performance, monitoring, and management. To be proactive around thresholds, alerts, bottlenecks, etc. 

Our developers and QA teams use this solution. They use it to analyze network traffic, load, CPU load, CPU usage, and then Tracey NPM, API calls for their application. There are roughly 100 users right now. Maybe there's 200 total, but on a given day, maybe 13 people using this solution.

It hasn't improved the way our organization functions yet, because there's a lot of red tape to cut through with cultural challenges and changes. I don't think it's changed the way we do things yet, but I think it will — absolutely it will. It's just going to take some time.

I like that you can build out a dashboard pretty quickly. There are some things that come out of the box that you don't really need to do, which is great because they're default settings. Once you install the agent on the machine, they pick up a lot of metrics for you that are going to be 70 or more percent of what you need. Out of the box, it's pretty good.

I have been using Datadog every day since September 2020. I also used it at a previous company that I worked for.

Stability-wise, it's great.

It seems like it'll scale well. We're automating it with Ansible scripts and service now so that when we build a new virtual machine it will automatically install Datadog on that box.

The tool itself is pretty good and the customer service is good, but I think they're a growing company. I think better access to their engineers when we have a problem could be better. For example, if I asked the question, "Hey, how do I install it on this type of component?" We'll try to get an engineer on the phone with us to step us through everything, but that's a challenge because they're so busy.

Technically-wise, everything's fine. We don't need any support, everything that I need to do, I can do right out of the box. But as far as, in the knowledge of their engineers on how to configure it on given systems that we have, that's maybe at six because they're just not as available as I would've hoped.

We were using AppDynamics. Technically, we still have it in-house because it's tightly wound into certain systems, but we'll probably pull that off slowly over time. The reason we added Datadog and eventually we'll fully switch over is due to cost. It's more cost-friendly to do it with Datadog.

Yes, we looked at Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic. Personally, I wouldn't have chosen Datadog for the POC if it were up to me. Datadog was a leader, but New Relic was looking really good. In the end, the people above me decided to go with Datadog — it's a big company, so they wanted to move fast, which makes sense.

If you're interested in using Datadog, just do your homework, as we did. We're happy so far I think; time will tell as we are still rolling things out. It's a very good company. It's going to be a year before we really can tell anything. If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good.

There are some strengths that AppDynamics and Dynatrace have that Datadog I don't think will have down the road, but they're not things we necessarily need — they're outliers. It would be nice to have them, but we can manage without them.

Know what you want. There is no need to pay for solutions like Dynatrace or AppDynamics that are more expensive or things that are just nice to have if you don't absolutely need to have them. That's something people need to understand. You just have to make sure you understand what it is that you need out of the tool — they are all a little different, those three. I would say to anybody that's going with Datadog: you just have to be patient at the beginning. It's a very busy company right now. They're very hot in the market.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Datadog a rating of eight. It does what we need it to do, and it seems to be pretty user-friendly in terms of setting things up.

Features-wise, I'd give them a rating of ten out of ten. The better access we get to assistance from the engineers on how to configure dashboards and pulling metrics that we need, that would bring it up a little bit. So overall it would be harder and it would have to be perfect for it. I would say maybe they could bring it to a nine.

From day one, we have seamlessly integrated our new product into Datadog, a comprehensive monitoring and analytics platform. By doing so, we are continuously collecting essential data such as host information, system logs, and key performance metrics. This enables us to gain deep insights into product adoption, monitor usage patterns, and ensure optimal performance. Additionally, we use Datadog to capture and analyze errors in real-time, allowing us to troubleshoot, replay, and resolve production issues efficiently.

It has proven invaluable in helping us identify early issues within the product as soon as they occur, allowing us to take immediate action before they escalate into more significant problems. This proactive approach ensures that potential challenges are addressed in real-time, minimizing any impact on users. Furthermore, the system allows us to measure product adoption and usage trends effectively, providing insights into how customers are interacting with the product and identifying areas for improvement or enhancement.

There isn't any single aspect that stands out in particular; rather, everything is interconnected and works together harmoniously. Each component complements the other, creating a cohesive system where data, logs, and metrics are seamlessly integrated. This interconnectedness ensures that no part operates in isolation, allowing for a more holistic view of the product's performance and health. The way everything binds together strengthens our ability to monitor, analyze, and improve the product efficiently.

At the moment, nothing specific comes to mind. Everything seems to be functioning well, and there are no immediate concerns or issues that I can think of. 

The system is operating as expected, and any challenges we've faced so far have been successfully addressed. If anything does come up in the future, we will continue to monitor and assess it accordingly, but right now, there’s nothing that stands out requiring attention or improvement. 

Datadog is too pricey when compared to its competitors, and this is something that its always on my mind during the decision-making process.

I've used the solution for nearly two years now.

Our primary use case for Datadog involves utilizing its dashboards, monitors, and alerts to monitor several key components of our infrastructure. 

We track the performance of AWS-managed Airflow pipelines, focusing on metrics like data freshness, data volume, pipeline success rates, and overall performance. 

In addition, we monitor Looker dashboard performance to ensure data is processed efficiently. Database performance is also closely tracked, allowing us to address any potential issues proactively. This setup provides comprehensive observability and ensures that our systems operate smoothly.

Datadog has significantly improved our organization by providing a centralized platform to monitor all our key metrics across various systems. This unified observability has streamlined our ability to oversee infrastructure, applications, and databases from a single location. 

Furthermore, the ability to set custom alerts has been invaluable, allowing us to receive real-time notifications when any system degradation occurs. This proactive monitoring has enhanced our ability to respond swiftly to issues, reducing downtime and improving overall system reliability. As a result, Datadog has contributed to increased operational efficiency and minimized potential risks to our services.

The most valuable features we’ve found in Datadog are its custom metrics, dashboards, and alerts. The ability to create custom metrics allows us to track specific performance indicators that are critical to our operations, giving us greater control and insights into system behavior. 

The dashboards provide a comprehensive and visually intuitive way to monitor all our key data points in real-time, making it easier to spot trends and potential issues. Additionally, the alerting system ensures we are promptly notified of any system anomalies or degradations, enabling us to take immediate action to prevent downtime. 

Beyond the product features, Datadog’s customer support has been incredibly timely and helpful, resolving any issues quickly and ensuring minimal disruption to our workflow. This combination of features and support has made Datadog an essential tool in our environment.

One key improvement we would like to see in a future Datadog release is the inclusion of certain metrics that are currently unavailable. Specifically, the ability to monitor CPU and memory utilization of AWS-managed Airflow workers, schedulers, and web servers would be highly beneficial for our organization. These metrics are critical for understanding the performance and resource usage of our Airflow infrastructure, and having them directly in Datadog would provide a more comprehensive view of our system’s health. This would enable us to diagnose issues faster, optimize resource allocation, and improve overall system performance. Including these metrics in Datadog would greatly enhance its utility for teams working with AWS-managed Airflow.

I've used the solution for four months.

The stability of Datadog has been excellent. We have not encountered any significant issues so far. 

The platform performs reliably, and we have experienced minimal disruptions or downtime. This stability has been crucial for maintaining consistent monitoring and ensuring that our observability needs are met without interruption.

Datadog is generally scalable, allowing us to handle and display thousands of custom metrics efficiently. However, we’ve encountered some limitations in the table visualization view, particularly when working with around 10,000 data points. In those cases, the search functionality doesn’t always return all valid results, which can hinder detailed analysis.

Datadog's customer support plays a crucial role in easing the initial setup process. Their team is proactive in assisting with metric configuration, providing valuable examples, and helping us navigate the setup challenges effectively. This support significantly mitigates the complexity of the initial setup.

We used New Relic before.

The initial setup of Datadog can be somewhat complex, primarily due to the learning curve associated with configuring each metric field correctly for optimal data visualization. It often requires careful attention to detail and a good understanding of each option to achieve the desired graphs and insights

We implemented the solution in-house.

I have been using Datadog products and capabilities increasingly over the last 4 years, from POC to widespread adoption. 

The capabilities we use are unique for each use case and can be combined in various ways to provide the full observability coverage needed to maintain stable operations and shift from becoming more reactive to proactive. 

Our organization uses both site/service reliability for the range of backend and frontend services, custom monitoring, and dashboards that can be dynamic and reused for multiple teams.

The capabilities we use are unique for each use case. They can be combined in various ways to provide the full observability coverage needed to maintain stable operations in order to become more proactive. 

Our organization uses both site/service reliability for backend and frontend services. Custom monitoring and dashboards that can be dynamic and reused for multiple teams. 

We continue to increase the size of our footprint as we get more and more positive experiences.

The APM, RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps have been some of the most popular and commonly used features. 

Overall, the Data UI and the usability of customer features continue to improve. 

The RUM session data and replays are much more convenient and applicable than other tools I have worked with in the past, and by combining multiple capabilities or features together, there is full visibility across the technology stacks and can identify specific bottlenecks or areas for risk and vulnerabilities to be likely to exist. 

Watchdog insights take the work out of the hardest part, helping us identify the issues before our customers.

It is very difficult to make the solutions fit perfectly for large organizations, especially in terms of high cardinality objects and multi-tenancy, where the data needs to be rolled up to a summarized level while maintaining its individual data granularity and identifiers. Tagging is imperative. However, the solutions could be improved for these needs in the future.

I've used the solution for over four years now.

The stability is excellent.

You can work with engineering to make it work for your needs. They are excellent at supporting their customers.

Technical support is excellent.

Neutral

I previously used New Relic, App Dynamics, Heap, Clicktale, and more. Datadog has incorporated many of the features we were looking for into a one-stop shop.

The initial setup is simple and straightforward.

We had an in-house team working directly with Datadog engineering support and technical enablement.

We looked into New Relic, App Dynamics, Heap, Clicktale, and more. Datadog has many of the features we were looking for in one place.

We use all versions of the solution.

We deploy various services for our main platform on AWS across multiple regions. We have a development environment, a staging environment, a QA environment, and a production environment. We deploy our many services across hundreds of instances. 

We have many server farms, all responsible for various services on our market intelligence platform. The deployment of each server farm or even individual instances varies depending on what stood up. We have instances built in three different ways, with two different pipelines and some even on user data scripts.

My team has a 24/7 on-call schedule where we need to be ready to handle and mitigate incidents with the platform at any moment. 

We have countless monitors set up on Datadog that alert directly to our queue using an email that generates a ticket. 

The actionable steps for each type of monitor and its associated incident are easily included in the alerts whenever something is triggered. We generate links to the Datadog monitors and can instantly drill down into what went wrong and for how long.

The features I have found most helpful are synthetic monitoring, APM, and alert features. The monitoring functionality, in general, and tagging infrastructure are great.

Synthetics have become bread and butter for us as we have migrated many tests over to Datadog. We have simplified and consolidated our synthetic tests while also making them more robust with the help of your tagging. 

A large portion of our monitoring is based on synthetics results, and alerts integrate seamlessly without an incident queue system. We use dashboards heavily. 

The metrics capabilities are extremely helpful, and we use virtually all of the widgets.

My main place of improvement for Datadog would be the documentation. While the tool is robust with many different capabilities, users would greatly benefit from more examples in the documentation. 

The number of current code snippets available in the docs is not enough, and some need to be updated even today. 

One function I would add would be a button to generate a report of the performance of a synthetic test and the performance of each of the steps in the test over time.

This timeline varies in terms of how long we've used the solution. We have one platform completely in the cloud and one still on-premises. We've had the solution for many years on AWS.

We use Datadog for three main use cases, including:

• Infrastructure and application monitoring. It is ensuring that our services are available and performant at all times. This allows us to proactively address incidents and outages without customers contacting us. This includes monitoring of cloud resources (databases, load balancers, CPU usage, etc.), high-level application monitoring (response times, failure rates, etc.), and low-level application monitoring (business-oriented metrics and functional exceptions to customer experience.
• Analyzing application behavior, especially around performance. We often use Datadog's application performance monitoring on non-production environments to evaluate the impact of newly introduced features and gain confidence in changes.
• End-to-end regression testing for APIs and browser-based experiences. Using Datadog's synthetic testing checks periodically that the system behaves in the exact correct way. This is often used as a canary to detect issues even before users reach them organically.

Since we integrated Datadog, we have had increased confidence in the quality of our service, and we had an easier time increasing our delivery velocity. 

We have seen time after time that the monitors we have carefully created based on all ingested data are detecting issues quickly and accurately. 

This means we allow ourselves to manually test things less frequently. We have also had an easier time investigating application errors and slowness using Datadog's APM and log explorer products which allow us to introspect any part of the system, in its execution context.

The most valuable features include:

• Integrated observability data ingestions: All data that Datadog collects is connected. This allows easily connected logs with failed requests, and slow database questions with services and requests.
• Broad integrations allow us to monitor our entire production environment in a single place, not just cloud resources. Since all parts stream metrics, logs, and events to Datadog, we can have unified dashboards and manage monitors and incidents all from the same page.
• A high level of configuration. We can configure and modify many parts, from how data is collected from our applications to how Datadog parses and visualizes it. This means that we always get the best experience, and we don't need to find ten different products that do small things well or settle on one product that does everything badly.

Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products. 

Older, more mature products tend to be complete (many features, customization, broad integrations, etc.), while newer products will often be at a "just above minimum viable product" phase for a long time, doing what's intended yet missing valuable customizations and integrations.

We've used the solution for 12 months.

The solution scales very well on technical aspects, being able to ingest large quantities of data from many services. However, the pricing often doesn't scale naturally, and effort has to be put in to keep ongoing costs at a reasonable amount.

Customer service and support are generally very high-quality. In most cases, they reply very quickly and offer well-researched and relevant responses. This is contrasted with many vendors who take a long time to reply and send links to documentation instead of understanding the problem.

However, we had cases where support took several weeks to reply to a complicated request and sometimes eventually responded that the issue cannot be resolved. These are rare edge-case occurrences.

Positive

A large part of the initial setup was straightforward. We were able to collect about 80% of the relevant and 90% of the meaningful insights from just a couple of hours of connecting the AWS integration and the Datadog APM agent. 

Getting it to 100% and configuring and customizing things to our unique situation, took about two weeks. Datadog's documentation and support team were extremely helpful during both phases.

We handled the setup in-house.

From the number of outages stopped or shortened (which lead to lost revenue from non-renewals) and the number of hours saved on investigations (which correlates to engineering salaries), I estimate that the ROI of the implementation time and monthly charges to be between 10x and 20x.

We use the solution as a SaaS deployment.

We use the solution primarily for distributed tracing, service insight and observability, metrics, and monitoring. We create custom metrics from outbound service calls to trace the availability of back-office systems. 

We use the flame graph to get insights into our GraphQL implementation. It helps highlight how resolvers work. 

However, it's lacking in tracing which GraphQL queries are run, and we use custom spans for that.

Prior, the team only had Instana, and few people used it. The main barriers to entry were the access (since it was not integrated into our SSO) and the user experience, which made it hard to follow. We had an on-prem version, and it wasn't the snappiest. The APM has made observability and tracing more accessible to developers.

Flame graphs are pretty useful for understanding how GraphQL resolves our federated queries when it comes to identifying slow points in our requests. In our microservice environment with 170 services. There are complex transactions over the course of a single user request since we essentially operate as a middle layer with 90 back office systems we integrate to.

I often have issues with the UI in my browser. I tend to have a lot of tabs open, yet have issues with it not responding or not showing data. A couple of times, pasting the URL into an incognito window shows the data that's there.

I've used the solution for two years. 

The initial setup was complex and required a bit of tweaking to get everything configured correctly and into our pipelines.