Datadog Reviews

Our company has a microservice architecture, with different teams in charge of different services. Also, it is a start, which means that we have to build fast and move very fast as well. So before we were properly using DD, we often had issues of things breaking, but without much information on where in our system the breaking happened. This was quite a big-time sync as teams were unfamiliar with other teams' codes, so they needed the help of other teams to debug. This slowed our building down a lot. So implementing dd traces fixed this

DataDog has many features, but the most valuable have become our primary uses.

Also, thanks to frequent concurrent deployments, the DataDog alerts monitors allow us quickly detect issues if anything occurs.

The monitors can be improved. The chart in the monitors only goes back a couple of hours, clunky. Also, it can provide more info, like traces within the monitors. We have many alerts connected to different notification systems, such as Slack and Opsgenie. 

When the on-caller receives notifications fired by the alerts, we are taken to the monitors. Yet often, we have to open up many different tabs to see logs, traces and info that is not accessible on the monitors. I think it would make all of the on callers' lives easier if the monitor had more data

We've used the solution for three years.

Our use case is to provide cloud organization application monitoring. I use it for insight into what host in what region has activity or what market is using Datadog to its fullest potential and utilizing that for cost. This may also help determine who is using monitoring and setting alerts or just setting up monitoring and not doing anything about it. The use case can also be to check when the host or applications are down, or if the usage of CPU, memory, etc, is too high.

The solution has improved our organization from a market perspective. We have multiple departments and need some time to gather that data from a grouping point of view. Grouping that data via tag or seeing the separation is easy. In addition, it provides metrics and insights for senior leadership to have a high level of usage and cost. Application teams have better insight into their application, outages, when to plan for patches, updates, etc. Also, they have a better understanding of where the data gaps may be.

The infrastructure is the most valuable. It has a high-level insight into the infrastructure model of the application and provides important detailed data on the host and metrics, which is the main concern of our customers. It provides confirmation that the layer where the application is running is monitored and will be alerted when it is down and not functional. The customers can have ease of mind knowing their metrics are accurately being measured. The value of data provided, including service name, logs, and all other pertinent details tied to the host, makes it a valuable source of data

The solution can be improved via open communication to the broader audience on what has changed and what has not changed. I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The stability is great.

Technical support is great. Datadog has the resources and knowledge to tackle questions.

Positive

I did not previously use a different solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The initial setup was handled in-house.

I did not evaluate any other solutions.

We use Datadog to view and aggregate logs and monitor all of our services. We have a lot of running infrastructure and it is very convenient to have logs and metrics all aggregated somewhere we can view and chart them. 

I use Datadog to create dashboards and runbooks, and sharable graphs, which really help out my whole team. We mostly use logs and APM, yet have been starting to use other products. I would like to use more synthetic monitors.

It has democratized our logs and metrics, allowing all engineers to have insight into how our apps perform. It is also extremely helpful when debugging issues. 

It would be very difficult to debug issues without aggregated logs and APM traces. 

It has also definitely saved us some money since we can keep an eye on our running infrastructure in an easy-to-see way, rather than a less friendly CLI. It has been a very big help!

The log stream has been the most useful thing. Having so many logs on so many different running containers means it is very inconvenient to view them individually. Datadog's log aggregation is really helpful since it lets me and every other engineer on my team login, view, and share logs when we need to debug our application. 

APM has also been extremely helpful for debugging issues and profiling and optimizing our apps. Dashboards have also been really helpful for communicating needs and priorities to engineering leadership. 

It is very easy to get buy-in with graphs to back things up.

I recently saw the education, and it is amazing. Events like DASH are extremely helpful in understanding the deep set of features. Anything that helps to educate users is a huge win here. 

The menu on the left is pretty dense (and I know it has to be). I never knew about the cmd+k functionality until recently. It would be helpful to offer more tips/cheat sheets to see handy shortcuts like that.

I've used the solution for three years. 

We previously used AWS Cloudwatch logs. It was way less friendly and fully featured.

The solution is pretty straightforward to set up. It helps with logs and metrics, and the AWS integration is really great.

We handled the implementation in-house.

It is hard to educate an entire team. There is a big learning curve.

We use the solution primarily for distributed tracing, service insight and observability, metrics, and monitoring. We create custom metrics from outbound service calls to trace the availability of back-office systems. 

We use the flame graph to get insights into our GraphQL implementation. It helps highlight how resolvers work. 

However, it's lacking in tracing which GraphQL queries are run, and we use custom spans for that.

Prior, the team only had Instana, and few people used it. The main barriers to entry were the access (since it was not integrated into our SSO) and the user experience, which made it hard to follow. We had an on-prem version, and it wasn't the snappiest. The APM has made observability and tracing more accessible to developers.

Flame graphs are pretty useful for understanding how GraphQL resolves our federated queries when it comes to identifying slow points in our requests. In our microservice environment with 170 services. There are complex transactions over the course of a single user request since we essentially operate as a middle layer with 90 back office systems we integrate to.

I often have issues with the UI in my browser. I tend to have a lot of tabs open, yet have issues with it not responding or not showing data. A couple of times, pasting the URL into an incognito window shows the data that's there.

I've used the solution for two years. 

The initial setup was complex and required a bit of tweaking to get everything configured correctly and into our pipelines.

We use the solution for application hosting and a little bit of everything when it comes to supporting a worldwide logistics tracking service. It's used as a central service for collecting telemetrics and logs. We find it does the same work as all of our old tools combined, including Prometheus, Kibana, Google Logs, and more; putting all of this information in a single platform makes it easy to corroborate information and associate a request with the data, which might be lost when it is saved as logs.

At my organization, we have plenty of microservices written in different languages. Different teams prefer one or the other framework or library within those languages.

With Datadog, we can get in a single line and march in the same direction; our logs and metrics are collected in the same fashion, making it easy to find bugs or integration problems across services and understand how they interact with other systems.

I primarily prefer to utilize the profiling and tracing feature. It can potentially be used as a more-informed alternative to logs.

Beyond that, anything I've wanted to do, I found a way to get it done through Datadog. It allows for testing, logging, hardware monitoring, system performance, memory consumption, advanced observability, AI assistance, cross-team collaboration, and business analytics. Datadog helps some of the world’s biggest brands transform faster with the help of true AIOps, AI-assisted answers, UX and business analytics, cloud observability, and smart AI assistance.

It's all supporting my desire to build a great application, and in a centralized SaaS application, it's hard to say anything can beat it.

The storage of logs is a little bit unexpected; most services generate gigabytes of logs, and their size is not excessive. When it comes to storing the logs with Datadog, I'm not sure why it costs so much to store gigabytes or terabytes of information when it's a fraction of the cost to do so myself.

I've used the solution for one year.

We have no concerns with stability.

It appears to be that there are no issues with scaling.

Technical support is slow. It takes forever to get responses from the support team.

Neutral

I've previously used Kibana and Prometheus. We are still using these.

Setting up through the environment variables made it unbelievably easy to get started.

We've implemented the solution in-house.

I do not have this number off-hand, as I am not the finance guy. I just like the product.

I'd advise new users not to start off by sending logs.

We did not really look at other options.

I use the solution to manage security-related logs and metrics, as well as create detection rules for security events. I am a security engineer, so one area of interest is the CSPM product, giving us the ability to look at findings across the cloud environment. 

The great part about the Datadog security products is that they incorporate the context of the resources/hosts where the security event is found. This allows us to see exactly what is running on a host that we see as a security alert.

The greatest impact it has had is on the ability to democratize observability and put monitoring into the hands of the people. Teams can quickly get the information they need, without needing a bunch of training, since the UI is super intuitive and easy for beginners. This helps reduce time to resolution during incidents and gives context to developers quickly and easily. Context is really important since seconds matter when the ship is down, and you don't know why.

I find the greatest feature is being able to search across logs from various microservices. As a member of the security team, I find that I often need visibility into other teams' services in order to get a good picture of our security posture.

I also am a fan of the ability to easily create monitors and get alerts into Slack quickly, without too much overhead. For example, I often need to create monitors where I am not too sure where the baseline lies. Having the ability to create anomaly monitors makes this process much more straightforward. Anomaly monitors are great for a security team.

One area where I was really looking for improvement was the CSPM product line. I had really wanted to have team-level visibility for findings, since the team managing the resources has much more context and ability to resolve the issue, as the service owner. However, this has been added to the announcement in a recent keynote. 

Personally, I've used it my entire time employed here, more than three years.

We primarily use the solution for charting application metrics.

We use it for all our application metrics, host metrics, and monitors with a PagerDuty integration. 

We integrate our application logs. It is great to be able to tie our metrics and our traces together.

We use the APM module with traces. It is great to be able to link APM, logs, and metrics in one go, as it shortens our troubleshooting and RCA dramatically.

We are loving the tool; it is great to have all those insights in one place. 

We hope that they keep making my life and our engineers' life easier.

The solution improved our organization with:

• Data-driven decision making
• Dashboards we can share with our customer success team
• Dashboards we can share with our sales engineers
• Help during incidents
• Help with preventing incidents
• Integration with PagerDuty.

The most valuable aspects of the solution include:

• The charting application metrics
• help with the business, prioritization, software design, and infrastructure design.

The pricing model hurts and forces us to work around the tool sometimes.

On top of application performance metrics, it would be great to have host performance metrics, suggesting changes to better use a cluster like: "You are over-provisioning this host" or "based on historical data, you will need to scale up in X days."

Adding a module to extract data from Datadog so we can use the data in our own system would be helpful.

I've used the solution for six or more years.

We previously used New Relic, which was a great tool. That said, Datadog is a more complete solution.

The pricing should be less of a surprise. They should allow us to cap costs which would lead to less frustration.

We need better documentation on the pricing.

It might be helpful if they added a pricing simulator.

We primarily use the solution for log monitoring across our entire cloud infra (EB, EC2, Batch, and Lambda).

This is in addition to Rstudio Workbench, which has its own logs that would not be picked up via Cloudwatch(https://docs.rstudio.com/ide/server-pro/server_management/logging.html#default-log-file-locations). 

We own several dozen of these servers, and we used to manage instance logs by tailing logs when incidents occurred. Datadog allows for much better visibility across our entire fleet and has saved us countless hours.

It is now way easier to search in one place rather than across all of Cloudwatch (and needing to know log groups, etc.). 

Primarily, we run several separate deployments of Rstudio Workbench, which has its own logs that would not be picked up via Cloudwatch. 

We own several dozen of these servers. We used to manage instance logs manually. 

Datadog allows for much better visibility.

We've found it most useful for managing Rstudio Workbench, which has its own logs that would not be picked up via Cloudwatch. 

Datadog allows for much better visibility across our entire fleet and has saved us countless eng hours as a result. 

We plan on trying out offerings such as APM moving forward too.

Some things that Datadog does very well:

• Technical documentation (the docs are clear, concise, and include realistic code samples)
• Overall education efforts (e.g. the codelabs/workshops)

We primarily use the log management functionality, and the only feedback I have there is better fuzzy text searching in logs (the kind that Kibana has). 

I've learned about a ton of other offerings, like APM, NPM, etc., over the course of workshops. Once I try those out, I'm sure I will have additional feedback.

I've used the solution for one year.