Datadog Reviews

We share dashboards, set up alerts, and monitor everything that happens in our system. We use it in staging, features, production, and our load test environment. It is exceptionally helpful for making our engineering more data-driven. 

I came from a company that believes we should focus on being telemetry driven. Instilling this in a smaller, less mature engineering organization has been challenging. However, it is much easier while using Datadog.

The dashboards are great. They are an easy way to give visibility into what we need to watch with others who are not SMEs.

I enjoy the custom metrics. With this, we can take things that were once logs and then retain them longer.

We are able to parse logs. To be honest, this was only useful due to the fact that we had not yet set up the Datadog agent properly in PHP. Once we did this, the Datadog log parsing was no longer needed.

The ability to pin to a date and time is very helpful. This allows us to pinpoint exactly what was happening.

We need more advanced querying against logs. While most issues I have had here can be alleviated by way of sending better-formatted logs, it would be cool to do SQL-type queries against our data.

We need a way to see dashboard metadata. We launched a huge customer, and we saw more people using Datadog than ever across the entire organization, yet had no way to tell.

It would be ideal if we had some way to compare arbitrary date times more easily. We would love to use the Diff Graph command against some hard-coded value, for instance, against some known event.

I've used the solution for eight months.

The scalability is great!

We previously used New Relic. I was not part of the decision-making team that made the switch.

The ROI is the speed at which we can debug live sites. It has been excellent. It's amazing how many incidents we can capture before customers notice.

We looked into New Relic and a home-brewed solution as potential other options.

We primarily use the solution for centralized dashboarding and telemetry viewing for teams across the organization. 

We're focused on ensuring that both development teams and leadership can reasonably gain insights into the status of various systems. 

At the end of the day, managing various dashboards and metrics aggregators like Prometheus, Kubernetes server, AWS Cloudwatch, and Grafana have lead to some confusion, and we've had issues with teams not knowing where their data exists and where they can view their system metrics. 

Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams.

The solution has been useful in generally ensuring that teams are able to better visualize and think about their application's impact on data centers/cloud performance. Having centralized tooling for observability means that each team can be on the same page when discussing monitoring. 

There have been some issues where teams have been unable to find metrics within the tool properly and some behaviors with the tagging and grouping functionality that seem not to be as easy to understand as one may expect. That said, overall, the experience has been one that is positive.

The dashboards have proven most helpful in ensuring that teams can track the performance of their apps. On a more practical scale, the alerts have proved invaluable for triaging and bringing services back online.

Being able to tie the alerts generated through Datadog monitors has allowed us to quickly and effectively respond to infrastructure and software issues that would have otherwise hamstrung the organization and prevented us from accomplishing our day-to-day tasks. This is naturally invaluable.

I'm sure that this is said all the time, however, the pricing model has led us to restrict the usage of the service. If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely. 

Aside from the cost, the nature of the tagging and grouping features within the monitoring dashboards have often caused headaches when creating new dashboards for aggregate services and infrastructure stacks. It would be nice to ensure that this feature is supported long-term and brought with easier accessibility.

I've been using the solution for three years.

Datadog is easy to use and generally looks great from a customer standpoint. The ability to export metrics all into a central location was crucial.

Datadog is very expensive for smaller organizations. The pricing model might be restrictive until the organization reaches a certain size.

Primarily we did an evaluation of other providers, such as AWS and GCP, outside of in-house solutions.

We primarily use the solution for log management and application performance monitoring. We have been getting into using more solutions on Datadog, such as runbooks, monitoring, and dashboards. 

Another area that we've been investing some time in is the database monitoring. We've been able to get some relatively new employees onboarded into the tool, and they've been able to create some meaningful dashboards and reports without too much hand-holding at all. 

We plan on exploring the synthetics solution as well.

We are still working through fully rolling the service out to our employees. Those that have so far begun using it have found that it decreases the time required to investigate and troubleshoot production issues. 

We have found that we're able to get in and out of troubleshooting issues much more rapidly, which in turn, of course, enables us to spend more time on our products. We are still investigating other areas where other Datadog services could potentially be injected into our workflows.

Correlation between logs and APM has been the most important feature that we've found in Datadog to date. Previous solutions around log collection or APM instrumentation were rather cumbersome to connect. We previously needed to use different solutions for each which were not connected and required complex queries and a lot of time investment by key employees.

The search and filtering capabilities are rather helpful as well. The aggregation of all currently available properties has been great. It's excellent that available options drop as filters are refined. This allows for a nuanced view of available data.

We intend on exploring other products at Datadog, so this list may expand.

I've found that the documentation is lacking in certain regards. In going through sessions around certain services, the presenter expressed opinions on best practices that are not covered by documented examples. 

In taking these thoughts to the "experts," further research is required both by us and those working the table to come to a solution that meets our needs. If there were more documentation on best practices this may be easier to manage.

I've been using the solution for ten years. 

The solution overall seems rather stable.

The solution seems scalable. We just need to keep an eye on the costs as it scales.

Customer support has been ok, yet not great. We've had ticket resolution drag on for weeks.

Neutral

We previously used Scalyr for logs and switched due to APM linkage.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We handled hte setup in-house.

We've saved many developer hours by using Datadog. We plan on expanding our investment in this solution (and thus our return).

Pricing can be a bit of a sell internally. We've found it to be worth it, though.

We came from using other solutions.

We are trying to get a handle on observability. Currently, the overall health of the stack is very anecdotal. Users are reporting issues, and Kubernetes pods are going down. We need to be more scientific and be able to catch problems early and fix them faster.

Given the fact that we are a new company, our user base is relatively small, yet growing very fast. We need to predict usage growth better and identify problem implementations that could cause a bottleneck. Our relatively small size has allowed us to be somewhat complacent with performance monitoring. However, we need to have that visibility.

We are still taking baby steps with Datadog. Hence, it's hard to come up with quantifiable information. The most immediate benefit is aggregating performance metrics together with log information. Having a better understanding of observability will help my team focus on the business problems they are trying solve and write code that is conducive to being monitored, instead of reinventing the wheel and relying on their own logic to produce metrics that are out of context

The most useful feature is the APM. Being able to quickly view which requests are time-consuming, and which calls have failed is invaluable. Being able to click on a UI and be pointed to the exact source of the problem is like magic. 

I'm also very intrigued by log management, although I haven't had quite a chance to use it very effectively. In particular, the trace and span IDs don't quite seem to work for me. However, I'm very keen on getting this to work. This will also help my developers to be more diligent and considerate when creating log data.

As a new customer, the Datadog user interface is a bit daunting. It gets easier once one has had a chance to get acquainted with it, yet at first, it is somewhat overwhelming. Maybe having a "lite" interface with basic features would make it easier to climb the learning curve.

Maybe the feature already exists. However, I'm not sure how to keep dashboard designs and synthetic tests in source control. For example, we may replace a UI feature, and rebuild a test accordingly in a pre-production environment, yet once the code is promoted to production, the updated test would also need to be promoted.

We have just started using the solution and have only used it for about two months.

We're new at this. That said, so far, there haven't been any issues to report.

I have not had the opportunity to evaluate the scalability.

Customer support is full of great folks! We're beginning our Datadog journey, so I haven't had that much experience. The little I have had has been great.

Positive

This is all new. 

We used to work with New Relic. New Relic has an amazing APM solution. However, it also became cost-prohibitive

Since we are relatively greenfield, it was relatively painless to set up the product. 

Our in-house DevOps team did the implementation.

I don't know what the ROI is at this stage.

I'm not sure what the exact pricing is. 

So far, it's been great!

We primarily use the solution for charting application metrics.

We use it for all our application metrics, host metrics, and monitors with a PagerDuty integration. 

We integrate our application logs. It is great to be able to tie our metrics and our traces together.

We use the APM module with traces. It is great to be able to link APM, logs, and metrics in one go, as it shortens our troubleshooting and RCA dramatically.

We are loving the tool; it is great to have all those insights in one place. 

We hope that they keep making my life and our engineers' life easier.

The solution improved our organization with:

• Data-driven decision making
• Dashboards we can share with our customer success team
• Dashboards we can share with our sales engineers
• Help during incidents
• Help with preventing incidents
• Integration with PagerDuty.

The most valuable aspects of the solution include:

• The charting application metrics
• help with the business, prioritization, software design, and infrastructure design.

The pricing model hurts and forces us to work around the tool sometimes.

On top of application performance metrics, it would be great to have host performance metrics, suggesting changes to better use a cluster like: "You are over-provisioning this host" or "based on historical data, you will need to scale up in X days."

Adding a module to extract data from Datadog so we can use the data in our own system would be helpful.

I've used the solution for six or more years.

We previously used New Relic, which was a great tool. That said, Datadog is a more complete solution.

The pricing should be less of a surprise. They should allow us to cap costs which would lead to less frustration.

We need better documentation on the pricing.

It might be helpful if they added a pricing simulator.

We are evaluating Datadog for observability and monitoring requirements that we have in our company. In our use case, our intention is to provide some kind of framework for multiple app teams to use the tool for our cyber ability and engineering practices.

They have a very good foundation in capturing metrics, logs, and traces. It's a very nice tool for that and it allows you to apply these monitoring tools in almost any technology.

Even if you have several layers, containers, EC2 instances, build machines or whatever you need in your infrastructure, Datadog can integrate with all of them across multiple cloud providers. It's a great product.

One of the improvement opportunities that we have identified in my project concerns how hard it is to manage an organizational structure when you have multiple things in one organization, and you want to provide some kind of isolation between them. At the same time, from the management perspective, you want to see an overall overview of what is happening in your business unit, or as a whole division. This is the kind of limitation we're facing.

I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us. 

I have been using Datadog for about six months.

It's a very scalable product. Right now we are using the SaaS version, so we don't need to worry about the infrastructure or whatever is needed for the platform it is running on. All the capturing of data is sent to the SaaS product and that can be as scaled as needed.

So far their support is pretty nice. They have established many meetings and training sessions, and they are supporting our requirements very well. I don't have any complaints with Datadog support.

While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five. 

Normally, the primary reason why people use these kind of tools is observability, but right from the beginning you have to understand what observability is, what it means for your company, and how the tool is going to help you to capture the proper metrics for making your applications observable.

We implement these solutions for our clients. We have implemented Datadog as an SIEM solution.

Because of our client focus, it is easy for us to sell. This is because it is easy to use and easy to set up.

While I like the ease of use, when compared with Tenable Nessus they could still improve their usability. They are okay, but there is room to be better.

They could have more integration.

They could be more intuitive as well. For example, the intuitivity of the user interfaces, and how long it takes for users to learn how to use Datadog.

It is not impossible to use, or impossible to do the administration with it but when you put these two next to each other, meaning Nessus and Datadog, Nessus comes out as the winner.

I have been using Datadog for two years.

We are not using the latest version, we have missed at least one update.

We have no issues with the stability of Datadog.

Datadog is a scalable product.

We have two customers who are using this solution.

Technical support runs 24/7. The technical support is absolutely fine.

We are also using Nessus. My experience using Tenable Nessus is better.

It is easier to install than to use it.

I was not the one doing the handling the installation. I'm a senior consultant, and I was coordinating, planning, and interacting with clients. But the actual installation, I was not involved with. 

The installation could be done in an hour or so.

It is not complex, two professionals are enough to complete the installation and maintenance of Datadog.

With Datadog, it's a monthly fee. They prefer monthly subscriptions.

I would recommend this solution for medium enterprises with 100 to 1,000 employees. 

Small business is too small for the way that Datadog operates. It is not the best for very large enterprises for a company with more than 1,000 employees.

I would rate DataDog an eight out of ten.

The main use cases are to provide visibility to costs for each product in the company as well as to consolidate all the observability in one tool. We are moving the team from being an operational team that needs to keep the tool up and running (applying patches and resolving problems) to a team that is focused on providing meaningful visibility of the systems, applications, and services of the company. We want to add value where the developers and the systems administrators are not able to focus.

The organization changed from having a team to operate different tools and providers to being a team worried about enabling and creating different dashboards, alerts, and automations in order to reduce downtime and increase the visibility of all the products, systems, and applications used. 

We moved from a full operation team to a team that adds value to IT, finance, product, back office, and any other team that requires correct information about the services provided while providing the possibility for them to create their own views and dashboards.

The tags are quite useful. They are providing the capability to give meaning to on-premises hardware (since it was not possible outside of cloud solutions and containers) as well to tag traces and logs. 

The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening. We'd also need to use several other separate tools that would require an increase in the required staff to operate them. Datadog gave us the opportunity to have a single platform for observability.

The product could be improved by providing remote control to agents, enabling them to execute automation and collections without requiring another automation tool or integration. 

Also, there is a lot of space for the FinOps discipline. For example, it could potentially provide better and richer information for the teams to check the costs and optimize the product.

I've used the solution for one year.

The stability is very good even though we have had some minor problems recently.

The scalability is very good. We've had no problems until now.

Technical support is good. That said, we had some cases that needed to be escalated to get to a faster resolution.

Positive

We previously used AppDynamics. The tool was not providing good system visibility as it was limited and had a very high cost.

The initial setup is somewhat complex. There is a need to create a new automation to install and deploy agents that needs to consider the required security for a financial company.

We handled the implementation in-house.

The ROI is still being calculated.

Users need to be aware of licensing control. With autodiscovery, the product can begin to come at a high cost.

We also looked into Splunk, ELK, and Dynatrace.