Top 10 ESET Cloud Apps Protection Alternatives

Vendor: ESET

4.8 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top ESET Cloud Apps Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ESET Cloud Apps Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ESET Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ESET, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

ESET Cloud Apps Protection attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing and ease of deployment, emphasizing quick ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers extensive security features and detailed threat analytics, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive integration and long-term security investments.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Report

Pricing

ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 is known for its comprehensive integration options, albeit with potentially higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection offers robust features and advanced threat detection, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive security despite higher costs. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection emphasizes integration efficiency and user-friendly deployment, making it ideal for businesses wanting cost-effective and straightforward protection.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Proofpoint Email Protection Report

Pricing

Proofpoint Email Protection offers a higher setup cost compared to ESET Cloud Apps Protection, which provides a more budget-friendly option. The disparity highlights differing value propositions for cost-sensitive users.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection offers efficient pricing and seamless integration within Microsoft environments, ideal for those prioritizing ease of deployment. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection's advanced threat detection and comprehensive features attract buyers seeking innovative security solutions, despite potentially higher initial costs.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) has a lower setup cost compared to ESET Cloud Apps Protection, highlighting its more budget-friendly approach for businesses. ESET offers a higher initial investment, which may suggest advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiMail

4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiMail

4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiMail attracts tech buyers with its robust security features like advanced threat protection. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection appeals due to its seamless integration with popular cloud platforms, ensuring efficient deployment and strong phishing protection, making it ideal for cloud-centric organizations.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Fortinet FortiMail Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiMail has a fixed initial setup cost, while ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers a lower, flexible setup fee that can vary based on needs. The primary difference lies in FortiMail's price stability versus ESET's adaptable pricing model.

View comparison

Pricing

Avanan

4.6 out of 5

Avanan

4.6 out of 5

Avanan offers advanced threat protection and seamless integration, favored for its user-friendly setup and competitive pricing. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection provides comprehensive threat intelligence and endpoint security, attracting buyers who prioritize long-term value in exchange for a higher initial investment.

Download Avanan vs. ESET Cloud Apps Protection Report

Pricing

Avanan requires an initial setup investment, whereas ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers a setup with minimal initial costs. Avanan's initial cost may be higher, contrasting ESET's more affordable entry.

View comparison

Pricing

IRONSCALES

4.6 out of 5

IRONSCALES

4.6 out of 5

IRONSCALES offers AI-driven phishing simulation and real-time threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing deployment speed and support. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection attracts buyers valuing comprehensive features like malware scanning and detailed reporting, justifying its higher initial investment for long-term security.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. IRONSCALES Report

Pricing

IRONSCALES involves a straightforward setup cost, while ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers a competitive setup pricing advantage.

View comparison

Pricing

IRONSCALES involves a straightforward setup cost, while ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers a competitive setup pricing advantage.

Perception Point Advanced Email Security

4.5 out of 5

Perception Point Advanced Email Security

4.5 out of 5

ESET Cloud Apps Protection offers cost-effective, comprehensive security with strong customer support. In comparison, Perception Point Advanced Email Security provides feature-rich capabilities utilizing AI, justifying its higher cost. ESET appeals to quick setup needs, while Perception Point suits long-term security investments.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

ESET Cloud Apps Protection has a straightforward setup cost, while Perception Point Advanced Email Security involves complex setup expenses. The pricing distinction highlights ESET's cost-effectiveness compared to Perception Point's advanced security investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

4.1 out of 5

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

4.1 out of 5

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server focuses on robust malware detection and anti-phishing with high configurability. In comparison, ESET Cloud Apps Protection excels in cloud integration and real-time threat protection. Kaspersky offers cost-effective stability, while ESET provides advanced features and seamless cloud adaptability.

Download ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server offers a distinct setup cost advantage over ESET Cloud Apps Protection, where initial setup costs can vary significantly affecting the total investment required.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server offers a distinct setup cost advantage over ESET Cloud Apps Protection, where initial setup costs can vary significantly affecting the total investment required.

Vade for M365

1 out of 5

Vade for M365

1 out of 5

Vade for M365 is powered by a collaborative AI engine that continuously learns from an alliance of more than 1.4 billion protected mailboxes, millions of daily user reports, and a team of cybersecurity analysts. Combining AI-powered email security and integrated features that are made for MSPs, you’ll save time, reduce admin workload, and get more ROI from cybersecurity.

Pricing

Vade for Office 365 is a solution offered at competitive prices in the market...Payment has to be made for the whole bundle of Vade products.

View comparison

Pricing

Vade for Office 365 is a solution offered at competitive prices in the market...Payment has to be made for the whole bundle of Vade products.

Related categories

Email Security

Vulnerability Management

Patch Management