When trying to move from MPLS to SD-WAN they have a very good SD-WAN offering.
The solution integrates well.
It has high-quality security features.
It provides a full end-to-end security suite.
The security of the solution is good.
I work with both Fortinet and Palo Alto. For me, the advantage of Palo is visibility, reporting and user authentication. Fortinet is easier and faster to configure. A commit on a Palo Alto is very long when we are used to have a direct modification of Fortinet. Virtual wire on Palo Alto is much more easier than transparent mode of Fortinet, it's really useful to prepare an integration or a demo in real situation and the tap mode is cool for that too.
When trying to move from MPLS to SD-WAN they have a very good SD-WAN offering.
The solution integrates well.
It has high-quality security features.
It provides a full end-to-end security suite.
The security of the solution is good.
The solution could have licensing fees reduced in the future.
I have been using the solution for 5 years.
It is not common for the solution to become unstable, but it does happen. The good thing is, they constantly release updates. If the version you are using has a bug, in the next version it definitely will be fixed.
The solution is highly scalable because they have devices that can handle a large amount of traffic. The VM version with the hardware appliances is widely scalable. It can handle small businesses to large scale enterprises. In terms of mode of deployment, you have VM, hardware appliance, and cloud. There is cloud management as well that is scalable. It can suit a number of deployment scenarios.
We currently have 50 employees using the solution, some of our clients that have deployed it has 1000 users and it has not given a problem.
The customer service was very fast to respond to our needs.
The installation is not difficult but there is a learning curve, it becomes easy over time.
The basic installation took approximately two days. A more complicated scenario can take even up to two weeks. Depending on the options that you are looking for, there are many things you can consider. If you are looking at a complex design then you are going to take more time.
I did the deployments myself with one other technician.
The pricing of the solution is very competitive. The license price can vary depending on the product you have and the different types of licenses you need. For example, they have an enterprise and UTM license. It depends on the type of license and the size of the company.
Fortinet has a product that can cater to any area of the security market. For example, application firewall and authentication products.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Fortinet FortiGate a nine out of ten.
We are a solution provider and FortiGate is one of the security products that we implement for our customers.
This is an easy solution to deploy.
Technical support needs to be improved.
I have been using Fortinet FortiGate for almost two years.
Stability-wise, FortiGate is good. We plan to continue working with it in the future.
FortiGate is a scalable product and our customer has approximately 2,000 users.
The customer support is expensive.
We have had difficulties with technical support from Fortinet.
I also have experience with Cisco, and FortiGate is the cheaper solution.
The installation is straightforward and it took about two months for us to deploy for our last customer.
Some customers have this deployed on-premises, whereas others have a cloud-based deployment. The choice depends on the environment.
We have an in-house team to deploy this product for our customers. We also give them technical support. Relationships with our customers are very important.
The price of FortiGate support is too expensive.
We try to help our customers evaluate and choose the best solution for them. Sometimes, they implement Cisco products.
Fortinet FortiGate is a firewall product that I recommend.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We primarily use this solution as a security perimeter and for VPN. We are partners of Fortinet.
I like the anti-malware and web filtering features.
The solution could be more evenly structured and I'd like to see orchestration in the calls included. The solution currently lacks that feature.
I've been using this solution for 12 months.
The stability is great.
The solution is scalable.
The technical support is good. We rely a lot on the documentation which is a good standard.
I previously used Meraki but I prefer Fortinet for its value and software capabilities. It's better than any of the other products in this field.
The initial setup is very easy. Deployment time depends on the complexity of the situation.
We pay an annual license fee - I get a good price on this product.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
Our primary use is for firewall protection.
It provides security purposes, and it makes our network safe from outside attacks.
The most valuable feature is the bundled subscription, which is IPS, TV and web filtering. I also like the application control.
I think they need to improve more in order to be a competitor with the leaders of the field.
It is stable, there is not too much downtime.
They need to be competitive with other solutions.
I use Fortinet Fortigate. First of all, I use them as perimeter firewall. Secondly, I use it for a data center firewall for internal segmentation.
The main benefit is the grouping of our security monitoring. I have all of my solutions from the same brand, Fortinet. I have only one console, one dashboard, all the security incidents that occurs on the network.
The Fortinet FortiGate product has original features that we use.
These features include:
I am looking to implement key authentication for admin access for the Fortinet product.
The technical support is great.
I was involved in the initial setup. When we decided to use Fortinet, we were already a customer of Fortinet. So, my previous firewall also was Fortinet and the experience with the brand and with the provider was very good. We have no issues. We like to keep with the same brand.
Fortinet is a very good solution. It would not be a mistake to choose Fortinet as a solution.
In the past, we had evaluated Palo Alto and Cisco as possible solutions.
SSL VPN, Site to Site VPN, UTM features and web override are nice features.
They need to improve a bit the SSL VPN to integrate with Sharepoint single sign on, with form base, Windows claim base and SALM base authentication.
For the last 3 years
Yes but that was resolved.
Yes, sometimes the CPU and memory get to 99% utilization but when this happens no users are working and no updates for windows are configured.
Yes, somewhat.
The level of customer service is bad because support is very pathetic.
Technical Support:Support is very pathetic.
No
Straightforward
In house
Yes
The solution is recommended for medium-sized and enterprise businesses that want their sensitive information secured.
There are lots of features and most of them are deployed for internet security. Users are protected if they accidentally go to some malicious sites.
The way everything is set up could be easier. Currently, people need a lot of experience and knowledge to administer it and to link it to devices.
I have been using the solution for approximately four years.
The solution is very reliable.
My colleagues have easily switched licenses and features for the device. There was not any complication, it was really intuitive.
Technical support agents are really responsive. They are a small company, but they are providing high-quality technical support every time we contact them.
The initial set up is complicated.
The price for the device and software is high. However, the solution is of good quality and has a lot of features. Licensing is on a yearly basis, it can also be purchased for a couple of years ahead. For example, for a single year or three years. If you purchase a license for a longer period you receive a discount or some type of credit.
We are recommending this solution to help increase the possibilities of securing internal systems of companies against intrusions.
I rate Fortinet FortiGate an eight out of ten.
You have faced problem with which fortinet device (Model No)..?