Google Cloud Reviews

I use this solution to house a machine learning model, based on text to speech and vice versa.

I have found this solution to be a quick and advanced way to run my models through.

I would like to see some improvement in the accessibility features of this solution.

I have been working with this solution for a year now.

This has always been a stable solution in my experience.

I have found this to be a fairly scalable solution.

The initial setup of this solution is neither very easy nor very complex.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten

We use Google Cloud for storage, infrastructure, and services. It provides file storage and infrastructure for deploying virtual machines, Kubernetes, or Dockers. We also use it for Google services that can be accessed by other software. Our company currently has about 60 users, and we plan to increase usage in the future. 

I've worked with Google Cloud for five years.

To discuss stability, we need to talk about specific services or infrastructure. Google Cloud has low downtime, but some services are slower, while others are faster. It depends on what you are talking about. It's stable on average. 

I consider Azure more secure than Google and Amazon because of all its certifications, but Google is secure enough and improving. 

Google Cloud could be cheaper.

I rate Google Cloud eight out of 10. It's not something I would recommend for everyone. It depends on the needs. 

I primarily use the solution for a couple of small development environments.

The solution is just simple and easy for me to configure. It's very easy to work with and navigate through. The user experience is very good. Overall, it's very easy to use.

The initial setup is very straightforward.

The solution has been good overall. I can't recall having any features missing.

The solution could be less expensive.

It may be helpful to go through some training in order to get comfortable with the product.

The user interface could be a bit better. I've done a few deployments following the tutorial, and afterward, I'm not quite sure what exactly I've done. I just follow the instructions and just finish the command prompt and then it looks like it's working - but why, and how? I'm not quite sure. I want to understand fundamentally what I've done. If there were more documentation and training, it would be very helpful in explaining the underlying processes. 

I've been using the solution for three or four years at this point. 

My usage is quite limited, and therefore, I haven't experienced many problems at the moment. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

It's my understanding that the solution can scale, however, I haven't explored this aspect yet.

Mainly, it's just me on the solution. There isn't much of a team surrounding it. I do have a couple of other teams outsourcing ideas, however.

I haven't needed to reach out to technical support. I can't speak to how knowledgeable or responsive they are to inquiries.

The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. It's not complex at all. A company shouldn't have any issues with the initial setup.

The deployment was very fast and only maybe took an hour.

The pricing is okay, however, it could always be cheaper, which is always better.

There isn't too much difference in price when comparing it to what else is on the market.

I'm a Google partner.

Overall, the solution has been pretty good and I don't really have any complaints to discuss.

In general, on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at a nine.

I primarily use the solution as the server for some of the applications I use.

The performance and stability are quite good.

The product scales well.

I don't have any problems using the solution. It's been problem-free for the most part.

The product could always be a little bit less expensive. 

I've used the solution for a year or just over a year or so now. 

The solution is very stable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

I've had no issues with scaling the product. It expands well. 

We have a team of 20 to 25 that use the product.

While I've never had to reach out to Google for assistance personally, it's my understanding that they are helpful. We haven't had any problems with them.

There isn't really an installation or setup process as it is a cloud. 

You do need to pay a licensing fee in order to use the solution. However, I can't speak about the exact pricing. 

I would recommend the solution to other potential users. 

I'd rate the product an eight out of ten. I've been mostly satisfied with the services so far. 

I develop multi-cloud solutions. I'm a customer of Google and a team manager.

The solution is simple to use on the web, and makes things easy for a software developer. It's also reasonably priced. 

I think Google Cloud could provide more services. 

I've been using this solution for four years. 

It's a stable solution. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

Google Cloud is a very good product but I think AWS is better. 

I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. 

The solution is fairly easy to deploy. There is no need to manage the underlying infrastructure, where all the details of load balancing deployment and version management are managed by the system itself.

Google Cloud offerings have a number of features which complement each other to provide very solid cloud feature sets. Google Cloud makes available many products and a person can build whatever he desires. A solution can always be found for anything one needs. 

My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies. This means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers.

I have been using Google Cloud for several years, three or four. 

We have employed every type of deployment, five of the applications being deployed on private clouds, others - both Google and Microsoft - being publicly deployed. We have a bit of everything. 

I limit my rating of Google Cloud to an eight out of ten. 

We use Google Cloud as a data warehouse. We build modern data warehouses on the cloud mainly for reporting and business analytics needs.

The most useful feature of Google Cloud is that it's basically completely managed or fully managed. There is no administration or maintenance needed from the user, and it's very simple to use.

Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible.

I've been using Google Cloud for about two and a half years.

Google Cloud is pretty stable.

Google Cloud is highly scalable.

Technical support is good.

As it's a fully managed serverless service, there is no setup needed.

It's not really an expensive solution, but it would be better if there were more flexibility in the pricing model.

I would advise potential users to first try it out and see whether the pricing model meets their requirements.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Google Cloud an eight.

We use it for storage and sorting our company documents.

I like it because it's convenient. Google Cloud is also stable and scalable. The technical support is good as well.

I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved.

It would be good to have fewer notifications.

I've been using Google Cloud for approximately five to six years.

It's stable, but from time to time it requests some notifications. In general, it's a good product.

Google Cloud is scalable. We have more than 100 users in our organization.

The technical support has been fine. We have not had any problems with it.

The licensing cost is based on the capacity we use.

I would recommend Google Cloud and rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.